>>83069>But how are you capable of seeing imagery relevant to questions people askthe imagery is not really related, i mean it depends a lot
in interpreting it I have to relate it back to the question
>that imagery supposedly being accurate to the individualβs unique circumstances?again, the imagery doesnt really have to be related
its like stacking boxes, you can only stack them in so many ways because of gravity
say you see a specific shape made of boxes, but not really all of it
when you then ask me to make the same shape with the boxes I close my eyes and have supposedly unrelated shit flash before my eyes, and then I re-create that shape
because the number of shapes that can be made is limited, the odds are a lot better, and the vision, even if it seems totally irrelevant, it still influences how I put everything together, the magic part is becoming receptive to those images from wherever
or changing them and thus reality itself, though I cant do that