Video games are* AI generated.
You dont have something that just goes on realistically, but you take your unrealistic breaks and interest, and put them in a simulation where everything else does not have context or the ability to think outside.
When you dont like how something turns out, you reload the save, just like people reprompt things to get a result they want.
When you dont like how the simulation works, you complain, just like people complain about balance and mechanics in video games. The stupid unrealistic simulation which becomes even worse when a player plays them, is supposed to change to a player? Is a chatbot supposed to be adjusted to imperfect customers with their garbage? No!
Subscriptions and decorations are also what people ask for. Same with advertisement, and same with hype. It is troony.
Chatbots are like video games. They are garbage, and whatever bad simulation it already is, gets worse by being influenced by a non-simulation human. Its incoherent and intentionally like this.
It is worse then a no-rules action, because here, there are broken rules that make things worse, and noone benefits. Its worse then theatre, even, because the theatre is a lie and a play, but it is orderly and meaningful, while Video games and chatbots dont even have a coherent reason or meaning, but are just "toys to touch and be engaged".
I hate engagement bait. If you were to approach a video game without engagement or false hype, and without the pre-conditioned lies, could a human finally be free? Even then, not, because they are fundamentally wrong, not just due to their approach. They are a sink of time and energy, just like chatbots.
Its reminding me of the mention of the apocalypse, where people who participate in the servitude of the beast are allowed to be successfull, but if you reject the lie, there are not many means of being productive, in society.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.