№10953[Reply]
>do you see any similarities with WWE today and WCW relying on older talent from other companies
The difference is, WCW relied on older talent but they actually did awesome stuff with their older talent and did intriguing things.
WWE today is just relying off of name value alone. WWE today AREN'T doing intriguing things with their older talent, they're just relying off of their name.
>if we put Cody Rhodes out there, people will buy it, because he's Cody. If we put CM Punk out there, people will buy it, because he's Punk. Doesn't matter who's fighting.
see? WWE today is relying off of name value alone. WCW used the name value and put something intriguing behind their older talent.
Hogan, Nash, Hall, Scott Steiner, Booker, DDP, Savage, Goldberg, Hennig, Flair, Bret etc. all got Punk, Cody, Orton, AJ Styles, Rollins, Sami Zayn, Dominik, Dragon Lee, Logan Paul etc washed.
45 posts omitted. Click reply to view. №11004
wewewefwffaaaaaaaa
№11005
xxxxxwcccccccwzzzzzzzzzz
№11024
Guys like Savage, Hogan, Steiner, Hennig ect. were actual manly men who fucked ring rats, hit the gym, partied, went on talk shows and all that stuff. Modern "stars" are just dorks who watch anime and spend more time on Twitter than they do working on their physiques.