"MIT+SOYJAK" would not be a valid or enforceable license. The MIT license is a specific, well-defined, and permissive open-source license. Attempting to add an ambiguous, unprofessional, and potentially offensive term like "+soyjak" would be legally invalid and would have the same consequences as the prior examples.
Why "MIT+soyjak" is unenforceable
Ambiguity and unprofessionalism: Legal contracts, including licenses, must use clear and professional language. An internet meme like "soyjak" has no legal meaning, and its interpretation is subject to change. A court would find such a term too ambiguous to enforce and would strike it from the license.
Violation of public policy: While not as overtly offensive as racial slurs, the "soyjak" meme is often used in derogatory contexts. A court would likely rule that including such a term in a legal document violates public policy against promoting abusive or hateful sentiment.
The MIT license does not allow arbitrary additions: The MIT license is a permissive, not a copyleft, license, but it still has rules. The only condition for using MIT-licensed code is to include the original copyright and permission notice. Adding a new, non-standard condition like a "soyjak image" would fundamentally change the license.
The image itself is problematic: The "soyjak" image, being a meme, may not have clear copyright ownership. Attempting to enforce a term that requires including an image of uncertain provenance and legality would be legally problematic.
What happens in a legal dispute?
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.