â„–22408[Last 50 Posts][1][2][Quote]
Persona Age Verifaction Has Been Breached By Furfag CommiepedotroonsIf you were retarded enough to give any company, and thus probably
(((Persona))), you ID, driver's license, face scan, or any other personal information, it is now not only in the hands of the
(((Government))) but also a bunch of
Alicias.
The group
vmfunc.re, who's site links to
e621,
FurAffinity, and their xitter (where
boykissers and
gender affirming selfies are posted), has gained access to a plethora of personal information belonging to millions of users.
The people affected:Users who have verified their identity with a platform that uses Persona. The big names include: Discord, Roblox, and OpenAI.
The Data Breached:>The leak allegedly contains 53MB of original source codeUser data breached appears to be this, but it may include even more:ListGovernmentIdNumber // government ID numbers
ListIpAddress // IP addresses
ListName // names (with fuzzy matching option)
ListPhoneNumber // phone numbers
ListEmailAddress // email addresses
ListGeolocation // geolocations
ListBrowserFingerprint // browser fingerprints
ListDeviceFingerprint // device fingerprints
ListFace // FACES
ListCountry // countries
ListField // inquiry fields
ListString // arbitrary strings
ListSelfieBackground // selfie backgrounds
Read More:https://cybernews.com/privacy/persona-leak-exposes-global-surveillance-capabilities/ https://vmfunc.re/blog/persona â„–22417[Quote]
>with fuzzy matching option
marge
â„–22470[Quote]
They're doing this to attempt to rape kids. Not even grooming, these sick fucks will want to do much worse. Why would a bunch of porn addicted retards (chai tea) want the personal information of actual cacas from the 'blox?
â„–22472[Quote]
>>22470You realize this is probably just showboating to demonstrate how insecure this databases are, right?
â„–22475[Quote]
>>22472If they wanted to demonstrate it, they would've said they deleted everything instantly.
â„–22501[Quote]
this is the mindset of the pro-datamining cucks on this arguement btw
â„–22526[Quote]
>>22475Nigger, they do, that's standard fucking practice for this shit. They only even actually pull it in the first place to see how much they can actually get
â„–22535[Quote]
>>22526Unless they confirm its deletion i'm not trusting a furryniggerpedokikejeetfaggotpedo with childrens data.
â„–22537[Quote]
>>22535You do know that the way this shit works is they find out that it's vulnerable, see if they can pull it, and then go "hey guys these retards fucked up big time and you should be angry", usually without even SAVING said data in the first place, right? They don't have any fucking use for it other than proving that they breached the system. If they actually WANTED the info for some reason, why the fuck would they tell anyone about it?
â„–22540[Quote]
can we get this info somehow? it would be so useful for doxes
â„–22550[Quote]
>>22546marge is my face leaked online or not
â„–22558[Quote]
They sold it on telegram breh breh
â„–22567[Quote]
>>22540Problem is that part of 'Blox are cacas,no reason to dox minors randomly
â„–22574[Quote]
>>22567some pedotroons also play der 'blox though
â„–22577[Quote]
>They're doing this to attempt to rape kids. Not even grooming, these sick fucks will want to do much worse. Why would a bunch of porn addicted retards (chai tea) want the personal information of actual cacas from the 'blox?
â„–22580[Quote]
>>22550if you scanned with it yes
â„–22581[Quote]
>>22546There was never any faces, if their was, these niggers would be in deeper trouble. The trannies never leaked any PII.
It wasn't blackhat leetGODs looking to steal data, it was just a group of tranny security researchers spreading awareness to Personas data collection that was not disclosed in their privacy policy, and their connections with Palantir.
â„–22582[Quote]
>The group vmfunc.re, who's site links to e621, FurAffinity, and their xitter (where boykissers and gender affirming selfies are posted)
why do these faggots have to shove their gay shit absolutely everywhere
â„–22583[Quote]
>>22581This is from my reading of this BTW, do your own research.Apparently the thing that was leaked was the source code used to scan faces and shit.
1. Matching peoples faces with political figures (for some fucking reason).
2. Stored biometric data for 3 years before deletion. (Eve&doe they sometimes say its for 30 days)
2. If they thought you looked a little weird, they would mark you "Suspicious".
â„–22584[Quote]
>>22583Having also read the thing, this seems accurate. There's no malice here, they were exposing what this fuckass kike company is doing
â„–22585[Quote]
we should rape and kill them because it would be gemmy
â„–22588[Quote]
>>22584As much as I hate trannies, you have to admit the things these trannies did was based. You can't trust any company to keep your PII safe.
But yeah, 'tube niggers are trying to make this seem like everyone got pwned.
No PII was stolen, but the shit Persona was doing with PII is extremely weird. â„–22590[Quote]
>>22588Ironically enough, I generally trust trannies to be responsible with handling cybersec shit like this because most of them have social justice ideals in the first place, and this is one of the few cases where you WANT somebody with that sort of mindset to be the one who stumbles across vulnerabilities like this, because they'll actually report it instead of selling the info
â„–22591[Quote]
>>22588Ironically enough, I generally trust trannies to be responsible with handling cybersec shit like this because most of them have social justice ideals in the first place, and this is one of the few cases where you WANT somebody with that sort of mindset to be the one who stumbles across vulnerabilities like this, because they'll actually report it instead of selling the info
â„–22592[Quote]
>>22588Ironically enough, I generally trust trannies to be responsible with handling cybersec shit like this because most of them have social justice ideals in the first place, and this is one of the few cases where you WANT somebody with that sort of mindset to be the one who stumbles across vulnerabilities like this, because they'll actually report it instead of selling the info
â„–22593[Quote]
>>22588Ironically enough, I generally trust trannies to be responsible with handling cybersec shit like this because most of them have social justice ideals in the first place, and this is one of the few cases where you WANT somebody with that sort of mindset to be the one who stumbles across vulnerabilities like this, because they'll actually report it instead of selling the info
â„–22595[Quote]
>>22588Ironically enough, I generally trust trannies to be responsible with handling cybersec shit like this because most of them have social justice ideals in the first place, and this is one of the few cases where you WANT somebody with that sort of mindset to be the one who stumbles across vulnerabilities like this, because they'll actually report it instead of selling the info
â„–22596[Quote]
FUCKING HELL QUOTE WHAT THE FUCK WAS THAT
â„–22623[Quote]
>>22597I would have deleted the extra posts if the site had let me geg
â„–22627[Quote]
niggers who say
>age verification for porn sites is litterally le censorship and le 1984, gooning is a human right
this is who's on your side, actual furtroons.
â„–22628[Quote]
>>22627not an argument. should i allow the government to bug my house because furries dont like it?
â„–22629[Quote]
>>22627It's not for porn dumbass
â„–22630[Quote]
>>22629"throw away your rights because trannies like it" is literal nigger tier logic
â„–22631[Quote]
>>22628retarded analogy, nobaldi chooses to get his house bugged and you don't know about it, if you don't want to put in your ID you can just stop being a cordnigger and not use it.
â„–22633[Quote]
>>22629it's for 'blox and trooncord which have, as everyone knows, huge problems with grooming.
inb4
>well parents should just not let their kids on 'cord and 'blox!they shouldn't let them, you're right-but we all know many will anyways, and unless you're some retarded lolbertkike, society has a responsibility to protect children from poor parenting decisions and circumstances-hence why Child Protective Services exists and there is a minimum legal drinking age.
â„–22635[Quote]
>>22631Unfortunately ID verification will be everywhere. You wont be able to do anything online unless you ID yourself.
There will be a time where you have to give up the fight for anonymity and start giving ID because everything will be KYC, anonymity will die very soon.
You could use the darknet, but ISPs are able to see that you use TOR or I2P, so
(((they))) could send feds over to your house to make sure you aren't doing anything that
(((they))) think is terrorism.
â„–22636[Quote]
>>22633why should my rights be infringed on because some nigger parent thinks sitting their kid on an ipad is a good idea?
this isnt going to stop it anyway, these things are easily circumvented.
â„–22637[Quote]
>>22636pure hedonism. you niggas claim to hate trannies and yet you act exactly like them, the exact same hedonistic disregard for anyone but yourself. Do you realize how many retarded soylennials(and gen x, to a lesser degree) let their kids have unrestricted internet access? it's likely the overwhelming majority. why do you think there are so many troons and porn addicts now? because for a decade and a half impressionable cacas have been groomed en masse via trannies, pedos, and porn slinging kikes over an internet with almost zero age gates. all of the worst "people"; silicon valley, the porn industry, braniggers who goon to 'p, troons and troon ACKtivist groups hate age verification, and that is because however flawed it's implementation may be, it prevents them from preying on cacas. the implementation, the privacy of the data-all of that can and should be debated and done right. but if your response to the internet's grooming epidemic is simply
>sheeit, all dese bigoted transphobic wypipo be takin away ma rights, fuck dem cacas, I don't care 'bout dem, not my problem maynethen you are a subhuman, troon-tier hedonist who is no better than a kike.
â„–22638[Quote]
>>22637Fuck out of here glowie
â„–22639[Quote]
>>22638geg do you have any actual argument nigger?
â„–22640[Quote]
>>22639Nigger you're the one advocating for the government to have your ID for everything you do on the internet; if you're retarded enough to be saying that HERE, then I can only assume you're the NSA/CIA's newest fag intern on baby's first assignment
â„–22641[Quote]
>>22637so we're completely absolving the parents from being lazy? i agree that groomers are a problem, but it is up to law enforcement to stop covering for pedos and do the job we pay them to do.
â„–22642[Quote]
>>22637also, your argument still relies on "throw away your rights because trannies hate it", which is nigger logic. this isnt about kids, this is about attempting to stop people discussing what american elites like doing with kids.
â„–22643[Quote]
>>22641no, like I said soylennials are niggers and terrible parents. ideally it would just be illegal for parents to let their kids on the internet when they're under 16 or so, but that is never going to happen, so preventing it at a platform level is the next best thing.
â„–22644[Quote]
>>22643or we can tell parents to not buy kids ipads and let them stay on it all day. my right to privacy shouldnt be infringed on because some dipshit thought the internet was a safe space.
â„–22645[Quote]
>>22640>ID for everything you do on the internetI never said that geg, I do think grooming hotspots like der'cord, preddit, 'blox, xitter, etc. absolutely need it.
â„–22646[Quote]
>>22645just look up "roblox age verification face" on youtube and youll find videos very clearly intended to bypass it.
â„–22647[Quote]
>>22645Nigger the problem is that if the legal precedent for this is set, then of fucking course the government is going to cream their panties and put it fucking everywhere.
â„–22648[Quote]
>>22644>we can tell parents to not buy kids ipads and let them stay on it all day.do you have any other argument nigger, I address this in the post you were responding to yet you keep repeating it. yes, ideally parents shouldn't be allowed to let their kids on the internet. but that is never going to happen.
â„–22649[Quote]
>>22647slippery slope fallacy, the government doesn't mandate you show your ID at the entrance of walmart because you have to show it at a nightclub.
â„–22650[Quote]
>>22648so should we ban kids from going to parks? groomers kidnap them there all the time.
â„–22651[Quote]
>>22648at this stage, why not support the ussr's idea of raising kids and take them all from their parents? you seem to want to absolve them of responsibility completely.
â„–22652[Quote]
>>22646so if it's so easy to bypass why are you so worried about your "fuggin privacy mayne"? can't YOU just bypass it then?
â„–22653[Quote]
>>22649slippery slopes are not always a fallacy. on the gay marriage issue, people were speculating back then that we'd be trying to legalize pedophilia eventually, and look where we are right now.
â„–22654[Quote]
>>22652because this was never about helping kids, and the timing of all this makes this obvious. this is about deanonymizing people so they will stop talking about the pedos in charge.
â„–22655[Quote]
>>22651by your logic child protective services shouldn't exist because
>it's parents responsibility to not mistreat their kids â„–22657[Quote]
>>22642>this is about attempting to stop people discussing what american elites like doing with kids.nigger you realize silicon valley elite kikes are vehemently opposed to age verification right?
â„–22658[Quote]
>>22655they absolutely have the right to exist. if parents fail their obligation to raise their kids right, then the government should step in to help here.
â„–22659[Quote]
>>22657then why are they rolling it out where they dont need to?
â„–22660[Quote]
>>22657They act like they're vehemently opposed to it, but in reality they're fucking salivating over having even more data to sell to the fucking chinks
â„–22663[Quote]
>>22658exactly. hence why if some lazy soylennials want to let their kids have unrestricted access(which is pretty much just abuse), there needs to be some measure to prevent that beyond just hoping they won't.
â„–22665[Quote]
you guys know how people dont care if politicians dont actually believe what their voting for, but the law is good anyways so no one cares? take this with that same logic. these companies are having their teeth kicked in showing that no one likes having their bullshit collected by crooked fucks. who cares who does it as long as it shows that people dont like it and WILL do something about it.
â„–22667[Quote]
>>22663not every misstep by parents necessitates government support. should your kid be taken away because you let them get less than 8 hours of sleep? that is bad for them.
â„–22668[Quote]
>>22659public backlash and trying to perfect it before it is mandated. 'cord for example has been in the news because a certain three digit satanic failtroll cult was using 'cord to groom cacas. 'blox has had similar attention drawn to it because of Schlep, David Pedozucki's statements and the pedo epidemic on there.
â„–22669[Quote]
>>22668all of which could have been prevented if their moderation staff did their fucking job.
â„–22670[Quote]
>>22660then why are they funding politicians who vote against it? Ron Wyden got over 350k from big tech, Sara Jacobs got over 150k.
â„–22671[Quote]
>>22670Because frankly they win either way
â„–22672[Quote]
>>22667nigger do even know what is happening on the internet? if you think cacas getting groomed into trooning out, sending 'p images, or killing themselves is comparable to them not getting enough sleep you are either retarded or a subhuman hedonist who doesn't care.
â„–22673[Quote]
>>22672didnt say that. those things could have been prevented if parents did their job and didnt let their kids sit on the ipad all day.
â„–22674[Quote]
>>22671so then why are they only funding the ones that oppose it? why would they spend that money at all? don't be retarded
â„–22675[Quote]
>>22673so how do you propose preventing that nigger? because it is certainly not being prevented right now.
â„–22676[Quote]
>>22674They probably have some other ulterior motive, nigger
â„–22677[Quote]
The main issue with all of this age verification stuff is that there will always be a bypass no matter what, some troon on jewtube will make a video tutorial for cacas showing them how to bypass 'blox/'cord age verification so that they can groom them. The argument that you can just bypass it yourself isn't fair because it puts your accounts at jeopardy if they find out you bypassed, and even if somehow it was 100% full-proof from bypassing with fake photos etc, these same parents who don't care about what they're children do would also not care if caca steals their id from their wallet for 5 minutes to get around it. You have to be a glowie nigger to think this is the solution.
â„–22678[Quote]
>>22676geg, there's now a secret unknowable ulterior motive because this negroid can't admit he's on the same side as
(((silicon valley))) â„–22679[Quote]
>>22675this needs to be prevented by parents themselves, not at the expense of everyone else. if you think that parents are just absolutely helpless and cant do anything for their kids, then maybe parents shouldnt be raising their own children.
â„–22680[Quote]
>>22679and what happens when they don't prevent it? because they aren't. You don't have an answer for that, because you are a tranny-level hedonist whose every opinion is based on what is most convenient for you.
â„–22681[Quote]
>>>22675
>this needs to be prevented by parents themselves, not at the expense of everyone else. if you think that parents are just absolutely helpless and cant do anything for their kids, then maybe parents shouldnt be raising their own children.
why not have good moderation, and good parents?
there's a thing as having 2 cakes and liking both.
â„–22682[Quote]
>>22675Genuine question, what do you think of ID verification for imageboards? This site and 4cuck are obviously not for kids.
â„–22683[Quote]
>>22681i was assuming moderators doing their job when i said that, that obviously needs to be a thing.
>>22680then law enforcement needs to get involved and track these people down. not everyone who disagrees with you is a tranny, im against the surveillance state because normal citizens shouldnt be watched if they havent committed a crime.
â„–22684[Quote]
>>>22680
>then law enforcement needs to get involved and track these people down. not everyone who disagrees with you is a tranny, im against the surveillance state because normal citizens shouldnt be watched if they havent committed a crime.
there's a thing called a balancing act and for privacy it gets super fucky. because it's either spy on everything or nothing.
â„–22685[Quote]
>>22683do you think being ID'd to buy alcohol is a symptom of a surveillance state?
â„–22686[Quote]
>>22685no, because the clerk looking at my ID isnt sending it to an elite group of people who hate it that people talk about them.
â„–22688[Quote]
>>22685The clerk is going to forget the thing in 5 minutes, not sell it to the highest bidder or tell the government everything I say for the rest of my life
â„–22689[Quote]
>>22682would be gemmy for 4cuck because they would leak massively over it. I wouldn't mind it here as long as it was through a secure third party service, but it probably isn't even necessary to have verification since the sharty is tiny and isolated from the wider internet.
â„–22690[Quote]
>>22684the government can already demand records from these companies including chat logs regarding things like this.
>>22685ive already wasted too much of my time talking to you, so im gonna go to bed. you should research what marx thinks of the family, you already are pretty close to a communist.
â„–22691[Quote]
>>22688glowniggers already know everything you say online, if they have any desire to they can easily get that information.
â„–22692[Quote]
>>22689>supports ID verification on fucking anonymous imageboardsYep, ABSOLUTELY a fucking glowie. Kill yourself fed
â„–22693[Quote]
>>22690you should read about the kikes Rothbard and Friedman who created your lolbert ideology
â„–22695[Quote]
>>22689This website would not be anonymous if there was ID verification. There would have to be accounts for that to work.
>secure third party serviceThere is no such thing as a secure ID verification service, everything can be breached, and ID verification services are literal gold mines for hackers.
>sharty is tiny and isolated from the wider internet.Not really anymore, more people are joining the sharty and the website pops up more on search engines. even if its still small, its still a potential risk for kids.
â„–22696[Quote]
also the majority of Americans support age verification, 82% of Republicans, 58% of Democrats, and 59% of independents. it's going to happen regardless of what the tiny minority of the population that is troons and branniggers want.
â„–22730[Quote]
>>22627Nigger its not about gooning
Do you really want to give you ID to every company because you tried to use any social media platform. Do you want the
(((government))) to be able to directly trace every post you make online to you, directly, because somewhere on the site somebaldi posted porn at some point
â„–22732[Quote]
>Genuine question, what do you think of ID verification for imageboards? This site and 4cuck are obviously not for kids.
Not for kids, but for soyTEENS
4cuck is at much larger risk of actually messing up a child, because the Xitter and Jewtube content farms love posting their wholesome chunguserino greentexts which would bait them into EPI
This site is pretty safe. You are way more likely to find porn or lewd content on any more common site, tiktok/insta has thirst traps, and xitter and reddit might as well be porn sites
â„–22735[Quote]
>>22680The internet as a whole isn't something kids should have major contact with until at least their mid teens.
Its all or nothing. Either you treat everyone as a child, or everyone as an adult. You can't actually hide 18+ content from children on the internet no matter how hard you try, and ID checking everyone for any internet interaction is dystopian. Parents should deal with it, the only option to create a safe internet for children is to JSID
â„–22779[Quote]
It's all a part of the plan, more or less. Just another step towards complete government control of mandatory ID verification on the internet.
â„–22789[Quote]
Why the fuck was it playing music when I was on there
â„–22790[Quote]
The furrycommiepedotroons are probably watching me through my screen that website looks sketchy as hell
â„–22813[Quote]
Snca