№22408[View All][1][2][Quote]
Persona Age Verifaction Has Been Breached By Furfag CommiepedotroonsIf you were retarded enough to give any company, and thus probably
(((Persona))), you ID, driver's license, face scan, or any other personal information, it is now not only in the hands of the
(((Government))) but also a bunch of
Alicias.
The group
vmfunc.re, who's site links to
e621,
FurAffinity, and their xitter (where
boykissers and
gender affirming selfies are posted), has gained access to a plethora of personal information belonging to millions of users.
The people affected:Users who have verified their identity with a platform that uses Persona. The big names include: Discord, Roblox, and OpenAI.
The Data Breached:>The leak allegedly contains 53MB of original source codeUser data breached appears to be this, but it may include even more:ListGovernmentIdNumber // government ID numbers
ListIpAddress // IP addresses
ListName // names (with fuzzy matching option)
ListPhoneNumber // phone numbers
ListEmailAddress // email addresses
ListGeolocation // geolocations
ListBrowserFingerprint // browser fingerprints
ListDeviceFingerprint // device fingerprints
ListFace // FACES
ListCountry // countries
ListField // inquiry fields
ListString // arbitrary strings
ListSelfieBackground // selfie backgrounds
Read More:https://cybernews.com/privacy/persona-leak-exposes-global-surveillance-capabilities/ https://vmfunc.re/blog/persona 53 posts and 6 image replies omitted. Click reply to view. №22650[Quote]
>>22648so should we ban kids from going to parks? groomers kidnap them there all the time.
№22651[Quote]
>>22648at this stage, why not support the ussr's idea of raising kids and take them all from their parents? you seem to want to absolve them of responsibility completely.
№22652[Quote]
>>22646so if it's so easy to bypass why are you so worried about your "fuggin privacy mayne"? can't YOU just bypass it then?
№22653[Quote]
>>22649slippery slopes are not always a fallacy. on the gay marriage issue, people were speculating back then that we'd be trying to legalize pedophilia eventually, and look where we are right now.
№22654[Quote]
>>22652because this was never about helping kids, and the timing of all this makes this obvious. this is about deanonymizing people so they will stop talking about the pedos in charge.
№22655[Quote]
>>22651by your logic child protective services shouldn't exist because
>it's parents responsibility to not mistreat their kids №22657[Quote]
>>22642>this is about attempting to stop people discussing what american elites like doing with kids.nigger you realize silicon valley elite kikes are vehemently opposed to age verification right?
№22658[Quote]
>>22655they absolutely have the right to exist. if parents fail their obligation to raise their kids right, then the government should step in to help here.
№22659[Quote]
>>22657then why are they rolling it out where they dont need to?
№22660[Quote]
>>22657They act like they're vehemently opposed to it, but in reality they're fucking salivating over having even more data to sell to the fucking chinks
№22663[Quote]
>>22658exactly. hence why if some lazy soylennials want to let their kids have unrestricted access(which is pretty much just abuse), there needs to be some measure to prevent that beyond just hoping they won't.
№22665[Quote]
you guys know how people dont care if politicians dont actually believe what their voting for, but the law is good anyways so no one cares? take this with that same logic. these companies are having their teeth kicked in showing that no one likes having their bullshit collected by crooked fucks. who cares who does it as long as it shows that people dont like it and WILL do something about it.
№22667[Quote]
>>22663not every misstep by parents necessitates government support. should your kid be taken away because you let them get less than 8 hours of sleep? that is bad for them.
№22668[Quote]
>>22659public backlash and trying to perfect it before it is mandated. 'cord for example has been in the news because a certain three digit satanic failtroll cult was using 'cord to groom cacas. 'blox has had similar attention drawn to it because of Schlep, David Pedozucki's statements and the pedo epidemic on there.
№22669[Quote]
>>22668all of which could have been prevented if their moderation staff did their fucking job.
№22670[Quote]
>>22660then why are they funding politicians who vote against it? Ron Wyden got over 350k from big tech, Sara Jacobs got over 150k.
№22671[Quote]
>>22670Because frankly they win either way
№22672[Quote]
>>22667nigger do even know what is happening on the internet? if you think cacas getting groomed into trooning out, sending 'p images, or killing themselves is comparable to them not getting enough sleep you are either retarded or a subhuman hedonist who doesn't care.
№22673[Quote]
>>22672didnt say that. those things could have been prevented if parents did their job and didnt let their kids sit on the ipad all day.
№22674[Quote]
>>22671so then why are they only funding the ones that oppose it? why would they spend that money at all? don't be retarded
№22675[Quote]
>>22673so how do you propose preventing that nigger? because it is certainly not being prevented right now.
№22676[Quote]
>>22674They probably have some other ulterior motive, nigger
№22677[Quote]
The main issue with all of this age verification stuff is that there will always be a bypass no matter what, some troon on jewtube will make a video tutorial for cacas showing them how to bypass 'blox/'cord age verification so that they can groom them. The argument that you can just bypass it yourself isn't fair because it puts your accounts at jeopardy if they find out you bypassed, and even if somehow it was 100% full-proof from bypassing with fake photos etc, these same parents who don't care about what they're children do would also not care if caca steals their id from their wallet for 5 minutes to get around it. You have to be a glowie nigger to think this is the solution.
№22678[Quote]
>>22676geg, there's now a secret unknowable ulterior motive because this negroid can't admit he's on the same side as
(((silicon valley))) №22679[Quote]
>>22675this needs to be prevented by parents themselves, not at the expense of everyone else. if you think that parents are just absolutely helpless and cant do anything for their kids, then maybe parents shouldnt be raising their own children.
№22680[Quote]
>>22679and what happens when they don't prevent it? because they aren't. You don't have an answer for that, because you are a tranny-level hedonist whose every opinion is based on what is most convenient for you.
№22681[Quote]
>>>22675
>this needs to be prevented by parents themselves, not at the expense of everyone else. if you think that parents are just absolutely helpless and cant do anything for their kids, then maybe parents shouldnt be raising their own children.
why not have good moderation, and good parents?
there's a thing as having 2 cakes and liking both.
№22682[Quote]
>>22675Genuine question, what do you think of ID verification for imageboards? This site and 4cuck are obviously not for kids.
№22683[Quote]
>>22681i was assuming moderators doing their job when i said that, that obviously needs to be a thing.
>>22680then law enforcement needs to get involved and track these people down. not everyone who disagrees with you is a tranny, im against the surveillance state because normal citizens shouldnt be watched if they havent committed a crime.
№22684[Quote]
>>>22680
>then law enforcement needs to get involved and track these people down. not everyone who disagrees with you is a tranny, im against the surveillance state because normal citizens shouldnt be watched if they havent committed a crime.
there's a thing called a balancing act and for privacy it gets super fucky. because it's either spy on everything or nothing.
№22685[Quote]
>>22683do you think being ID'd to buy alcohol is a symptom of a surveillance state?
№22686[Quote]
>>22685no, because the clerk looking at my ID isnt sending it to an elite group of people who hate it that people talk about them.
№22688[Quote]
>>22685The clerk is going to forget the thing in 5 minutes, not sell it to the highest bidder or tell the government everything I say for the rest of my life
№22689[Quote]
>>22682would be gemmy for 4cuck because they would leak massively over it. I wouldn't mind it here as long as it was through a secure third party service, but it probably isn't even necessary to have verification since the sharty is tiny and isolated from the wider internet.
№22690[Quote]
>>22684the government can already demand records from these companies including chat logs regarding things like this.
>>22685ive already wasted too much of my time talking to you, so im gonna go to bed. you should research what marx thinks of the family, you already are pretty close to a communist.
№22691[Quote]
>>22688glowniggers already know everything you say online, if they have any desire to they can easily get that information.
№22692[Quote]
>>22689>supports ID verification on fucking anonymous imageboardsYep, ABSOLUTELY a fucking glowie. Kill yourself fed
№22693[Quote]
>>22690you should read about the kikes Rothbard and Friedman who created your lolbert ideology
№22695[Quote]
>>22689This website would not be anonymous if there was ID verification. There would have to be accounts for that to work.
>secure third party serviceThere is no such thing as a secure ID verification service, everything can be breached, and ID verification services are literal gold mines for hackers.
>sharty is tiny and isolated from the wider internet.Not really anymore, more people are joining the sharty and the website pops up more on search engines. even if its still small, its still a potential risk for kids.
№22696[Quote]
also the majority of Americans support age verification, 82% of Republicans, 58% of Democrats, and 59% of independents. it's going to happen regardless of what the tiny minority of the population that is troons and branniggers want.
№22730[Quote]
>>22627Nigger its not about gooning
Do you really want to give you ID to every company because you tried to use any social media platform. Do you want the
(((government))) to be able to directly trace every post you make online to you, directly, because somewhere on the site somebaldi posted porn at some point
№22732[Quote]
>Genuine question, what do you think of ID verification for imageboards? This site and 4cuck are obviously not for kids.
Not for kids, but for soyTEENS
4cuck is at much larger risk of actually messing up a child, because the Xitter and Jewtube content farms love posting their wholesome chunguserino greentexts which would bait them into EPI
This site is pretty safe. You are way more likely to find porn or lewd content on any more common site, tiktok/insta has thirst traps, and xitter and reddit might as well be porn sites
№22735[Quote]
>>22680The internet as a whole isn't something kids should have major contact with until at least their mid teens.
Its all or nothing. Either you treat everyone as a child, or everyone as an adult. You can't actually hide 18+ content from children on the internet no matter how hard you try, and ID checking everyone for any internet interaction is dystopian. Parents should deal with it, the only option to create a safe internet for children is to JSID
№22779[Quote]
It's all a part of the plan, more or less. Just another step towards complete government control of mandatory ID verification on the internet.
№22789[Quote]
Why the fuck was it playing music when I was on there
№22790[Quote]
The furrycommiepedotroons are probably watching me through my screen that website looks sketchy as hell
№22813[Quote]
Snca