â„–16891911[Quote]
No
â„–16891917[Quote]
>>16891911dont wanna hear from you, youre a pedophile
any normal 'teens who can answer my question?
â„–16891923[Quote]
>>16891917im not a pedophile
â„–16891933[Quote]
>>16891919This site is 18+. He's a soyadult now
â„–16891934[Quote]
>>16891919he was canonically 16 before rule 13 change, because average 'teen definitely doesnt break any rules on this site, right?
â„–16891940[Quote]
made a poll for this
â„–16891944[Quote]
Nate is more of an idea them one particular character. There are multiple nates of all kinds because they are supposed to represent us or something award
â„–16891946[Quote]
>>16891940He is also 18 post cacacaust
â„–16891952[Quote]
I goon to aged up Nate
â„–16891957[Quote]
'ta not 'p not everything is 'p if you say 'li or 'ta is 'p pedos will rape you in debate
â„–16891959[Quote]
>>16891944tsmt
You shouldn't goon to characters and ideas because they transcend the human morality of the age of consent
â„–16891977[Quote]
>>16891960"Nate is a minor, so if you see an obsessed jartycuck sexualizing xim report for rule 2."
that settles is
â„–16891981[Quote]
How old is htsm
â„–16891982[Quote]
>>16891960Nate was never just one character.
People just characterize him as a particular character in OCs. Nate and all of the his subvariants are supposed to represent different people in the soysphere. If for instance the Nate post was specially trying to represent an underage user than maybe you are right
â„–16891984[Quote]
>>16891981probably the same age as nate
â„–16892003[Quote]
>>16891981who cares it doesn't matter its a drawing that was made to say "you look like this"
â„–16892020[Quote]
I feel like this thread is a falseflag
â„–16892023[Quote]
even if Nate was 40 years old gooning to 'jak OCs is jartycuck behavior
â„–16892025[Quote]
>>16892020no im seriously asking a question
â„–16892040[Quote]
>>16892023either way people make sexual depictions of him, especially with the 'fe woman so i feel like if its of a 16 year old its kind of extra jartycuckish
â„–16892050[Quote]
>>16891976shartytrannies this is your mindset
â„–16892051[Quote]
>>16892028that's why i selected a specific revision that was peer-reviewed by soyentific community which also coincidentally happens to support my point of view
â„–16892138[Quote]
yes, but also who is making porn of soyjaks, how mentally far gone do you have to be to make porn of and jerk off to soyjaks
>its just bait mayne
is it really?