№16883818[Quote]
playing devil's advocate for a moment, smuglet, if not depicted doing anything sexual isn't immoral in and of itself. by this logic you can't post any underage characters doing anything, like babyjak.
№16883819[Quote]
bvmp
№16883827[Quote]
>>16883818by this logic you could post a certain lollipop holding “””””””variant”””””””
№16883832[Quote]
>>16883827I don't know what this means
№16883834[Quote]
>>16883832Banned pedo variant
№16883838[Quote]
>>16883827I don't know the history but wasn't the variant SPECIFICALLY banned because people were using it sexually and literal pedos were using it? so rather than it being underaged, it was specifically fitting the logic of what first poster said?
№16883843[Quote]
File: KEK.jpg 📥︎ (89.86 KB, 614x586) 6876ef948de85f90124063953ac4e2ce0ImgOps
>>16883837>nusoi don't even know their gachaKEK NUSOI WHY SO UNCULTURED?
№16883870[Quote]
>>16883862It's true, no need to ask snopes
№16883871[Quote]
>>16883827even then he's still correct
№16883881[Quote]
>>16883853ohhh you meant her. Yeah, I mean I've seen that variant used in plenty of innocent ways though. I think the point still stands that so long as its not explicitly sexual there isn't really a problem.
№16883887[Quote]
>>16883837Are ZZZ Fans are Like Lesser forms of Blue Archive fans? They act like the same way as them.
№16883898[Quote]
>>16883887I think ZZZ characters are less likely to be pedoshit.Im not sure though, because this is snca
№16883915[Quote]
>>16883887there is an obvious overlap but ba players mostly just goon to the characters. also zzz has a significant left-adjacent fanbase comprised of women that came from genshin impact
№16883924[Quote]
>>16883898A quite of them are. and their Fans act like Rabids as always.
№16883925[Quote]
>>16883887iirc the game has some child like agents but most of the time its adults
№16883927[Quote]
>>16883827There was a more deeper reason on why ‘lita was banned outside of it being from a rather morally corrupt drawing. And that is becuase one: her color scheme matches the MAP flag. And two: she was spammed by hostile offsiters making edits of her traced over actual ‘p. Since not many liked her in the first place the site administration decided to just nip the problem fully and ban her.
№16883929[Quote]
>>16883838Smuglet is also being used sexually and pedos are definitely using it
>>16883881Difference between babyjak and smuglet and other variants is that babyjak was just created to make fun of cacas, while smuglet was created for nefarious purposes
№16883931[Quote]
>>16883924is zhu yuan underage? I don't think so because she is very well endowed, and I'd hope not because i've gooned to this before
№16883935[Quote]
>>>16883924
>is zhu yuan underage? I don't think so because she is very well endowed, and I'd hope not because i've gooned to this before
she is fully adult, dont worry op
№16883940[Quote]
>>16883929One person (aout) being a retard with it doesnt make him a pedo neither does it mean its sexual. Nobody is jerking off to the smuglet bbc image
№16883942[Quote]
>>16883853DIdn't know that chudjak with his legs spread was traced from 'p holy shit
№16883957[Quote]
>>16883929Interesting point, but how do you prove beyond a shadow of a doubt the "intent" of a drawing? The "Lollipop variant" discussed earlier, I'm pretty sure was just supposed to be a non-sexual depiction of a young girl. Main example I'm thinking of was that FDJ SMV
№16883959[Quote]
>>16883940How is “Smuglet built for my bwc” not sexual, and let’s be real, more than one person is gooning to smuglet and pedos are obviously going to use it for pedophilic purposes
№16883964[Quote]
>>16883959I agree with you here, BBC is definitely explicitly sexual
№16883968[Quote]
>>16883957It was more acceptable back then so that’s why you would see her in some smvs, also it’s in the name
№16883975[Quote]
>>16883931this nigga needs approval from the bald men glasses website to goon to characters
№16883981[Quote]
>>16883959Have you ever been on the internet? Faggots saying that are trying to bait you.
And im not trying to invalidate your concerns either because people ARE that fucked in the head but the fucker is using “bwc”. All smuglet posts are made to bait you
№16883986[Quote]
>>16883981bait or not bait, sexualizing characters that represent children is bad.
№16883989[Quote]
>>16883981>>16883981I agree with you since most smuglet posts are just bait, however it can definitely be irony poisoned
№16883990[Quote]
>>16883931Why do you care. It’s anime, they break all laws of nature often. Shit like drawing a girl than calling it a man. Apply nuance
№16883994[Quote]
‘blox is banned but poo archive isn’t? KEEEK! just shut it down!
№16884002[Quote]
up
№16884035[Quote]
>>16883989This entire website is irony poisoned
We dox pedos but spam child gore. You shouldve thought about the morality of this shitshow about 4 fucking years ago
>>16883986True, i agree. But smuglet doesn’t even look human, if you jerk off to that you are jerking off to a 2d creature. You are conditioning yourself to the 2d.
№16884052[Quote]
>>16883887I forgot to say this but one of ZZZ's Art Designer (Waterkuma) is a open 'li pedo
№16884074[Quote]
>>16884035Difference between spamming child gore and gooning to it
№16884076[Quote]
>>16884035Don't try to use logic with soytroons
№16884096[Quote]
>>16884066enjoy the ban, maybe you can use the time to get a hobby
№16884098[Quote]
>>16884074>differenceTheres a huge difference. But thats not the reason i brought it up. The reason i brought it up is because the person i was replying to was trying to say “if smuglet is posted here, WHOS TO SAY SOMEBODY ISNT GOONING TO IT” and I tried to let them in on the fact that they shouldve applied the same logic to DNB if they didnt want this shit about 4 years ago. Get it?
№16884106[Quote]
>>16884035this website has no actual moral framework, it would be better if people stopped pretending to have some noble goal in mind posting/doxing/raiding here and admit they do this for the lulz
№16884127[Quote]
>>16884106Exactly, and you know what it reminds me of? Fucking lolicons. Exact same behavior of trying to make something that is real morally reprehensible actually normal and for a good cause.
>but LE CENSORSHIP! BUT ITS LE FAKE!Ok? Dont care, its fucking weird, stop trying to prove to others its not.
Theres no noble goal here from both sides, you all suck
№16884128[Quote]
>>16884106also many swatting and other com groups used the excuse of "they are pedophiles" to go after people they dislike years before sharty existed. raiding culture on here is basically foodism 2.0
№16884159[Quote]
>>16884128Far from it, those comfag groups swat other comskiddies because they are 70 iq retards, its just ingroup shitflinging over who will be the next SLVTTA for big %GLOW%% coock
№16884169[Quote]
>>16884098Pedophilia is way more common than negrophilia, so there’s more of a concern with smuglet automatically.
№16884170[Quote]
>>16883786 (OP)I don't get why they allow smugglet, it's literally just a 'lita bypass.
№16884174[Quote]
>>16884170to 'bait' the 'hunkies' or something
№16884179[Quote]
>>16884128we had a problem during a steamer raid thread apparenty some nigger swatted a streamer while we send 'za
№16884181[Quote]
>>16883837Retard smuglet is clearly traced from a blue archive trend.
№16884191[Quote]
>>16884179People who 'watt 9/10 will just subpoena to a jailcell nigga. Especially COMlarpers since they'll brag about it in dercord.
№16884214[Quote]
>>16884187muh fuggen failtrolls mayne
№16884223[Quote]
>>16884214This is completely accurate though, they feed off any attention and any reaction whether or not if its positive or negative
Thats why they spam 'P
№16884240[Quote]
>>16884223Same premise, honestly if the smuglets a big deal everybody should just migrate this sites dead anyways.
№16884258[Quote]
I think even if we have smuglet as a popular variant actual blue archive lolipedos arnt going to migrate to the site especially since the active doxinu and hostility against lolipedos.