/soy/ - Soyjaks

And how is this bad?

extend his ban pls

>>16808599
If you want I can also explain the lore behind the ban
>>16808602
It's permanant

>>16808608
I'm happy to hear

>>16808660
You'll never be a lee

>>16808624
I got rangebanned on /a/ since the janny there (the old one) was a clitty leaking faggot
When I was randomly browsing /o/ I saw an anti-tranime copypasta on /a/ and I copied it( it said something like tranime is the worst escapism and goonslop). After a long time, I decided to repost it on /a/ but with a jak. The post got deleted later on. It wasn't offtopic. Anyway, I kept on reposting the 'pasta on /a/ and my posts kept on getting deleted. After a while, I started a raid on /soy/ (in which only I participated), to spam janny soyjaks on /a/. Later I got rangebanned. I didn't do anything permaban worthy doe

>>16808669
>Here's 100 bait screenshots that I fell for. Therefore frogs are bad.
Soykek mindset.

>>16808660
>>16808669
Fag

I used to spam /a/ threads with glow emojis and it would make the threads near unusable

>>16808721
From what I've heard there's a new jannitor on /a/

>>16808727
There was and is no /a/ janny actually.

>>16808732
So there isn't one anymore?

>>16808760
There never was. That's what I was told

>>16808765
Meds now. There clearly was an uptight nepali jannitor on /a/.