№16759919[Quote]
the second if the heroic act is monumental towards saving the white race, then yes, a worthy sacrifice and then some
№16759921[Quote]
I'd rather choose the first option, fame is for narcissists
№16759923[Quote]
Vote o algo
№16759927[Quote]
first
№16759934[Quote]
would it ACTUALLY change anything doe? or would it be just a second 9/11 (if 9/11 was done by actual jihadists)
№16759944[Quote]
>>16759921The appeal of the second option isn't just the fame doe, you do some kind of heroic action. Idk what, maybe you do something which leads to a revolution to overthrow the government and save le West, or end a high percent of child exploitation on earth, or something like that
№16759946[Quote]
>>16759934the way it is worded, that you are remembering in history and written about, and that it is considered heroic, implies a kind of victory and worthiness to it
№16759951[Quote]
The second option, duh. First is for literal goyim. Sounds so dreary and mindless and boring.
№16760138[Quote]
bumo
№16760150[Quote]
why bump failed
№16760172[Quote]
>>16759908 (OP)If I were to save the world with the change I bring in, I wouldn't die a depressed chud
№16760176[Quote]
>>16759951If it was a truly happy life, would it truly be boring?
№16760184[Quote]
>>16760172You may not live to see the changes your actions bring, but they will still happen
№16760188[Quote]
>>16760184then I'm down for the latter, there is no point in enjoying something that won't last for my grandchildren
№16760194[Quote]
>>16759944Ehhh still it doesn't effect me personally, I don't care about faggy shit like returning to tradition and making everything some lame ass European renaissance fair
№16760212[Quote]
First one is literary a death to your soul, living as a nobody, id genuinely rather be a genocidal maniac drug addict dictator than be nobody.
№16760238[Quote]
God your life must be miserable…
№16760247[Quote]
>>16760212Genghis Khan once said this
№16760257[Quote]
>>16760211It doesn't, that's simple.
Only obsessed manchildren care about things greater than themselves.
№16760266[Quote]
>>16760260Right before he killed 40 million people or something
№16760282[Quote]
>>16760257Omg how miserable ARE you…
№16760308[Quote]
Many people are saying that the second option is good because it's selfless, but think about it like this
If it pleases you to help others, you are doing something for yourself, so it is selfish.
№16760332[Quote]
>>16759908 (OP)second option is just alexander minus the depressed part, it's the objectively better option
№16760344[Quote]
>>16760308So whats the point of doing ANYTHING, literary everything you can be interpreted as "selfish"
№16760359[Quote]
>>16760344There is no point, but hey if it makes me happy then so be it
Besides fuck this gay world, if you were a weak shitstain they would wipe you out, the best way to shit on everyone is to live a happy life
№16760374[Quote]
>>16760359Thats selfish???
№16760390[Quote]
>>16760374Yeah but who cares, all the niggers and crackers who stomped me and treated me like trash will suffer while I and my loved ones thrive
№16760560[Quote]
my only priority is dying happy, so it depends on if my final deed feels fulfilling or not.
currently, i dont have a realistic deed like that