>The apostrophes at the beginning of a few of the words, like 'party and 'jakking, for example, are not explained in context or in a footnote, and may initially read as typos for people who may not figure they are a part of the culture of the board. A [sic

Email
Subject
Comment
Verification	Please type the name of the object/variant:
File
Embed
Voice
Poll
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: IMG_3411.png 📥︎ (236.03 KB, 665x800) ImgOps

File: IMG_3410.jpeg 📥︎ (600.56 KB, 1170x1399) ImgOps

Sneed 04/21/26 (Tue) 18:44:19 №15929134 [Quote]

>The apostrophes at the beginning of a few of the words, like 'party and 'jakking, for example, are not explained in context or in a footnote, and may initially read as typos for people who may not figure they are a part of the culture of the board. A [sic] tag would be used too much, and not explain the apostrophe. The apostrophes could simply be removed, or a footnote could be added, but a source for that is required. Not sure what to choose because I don't have a source for that slang on hand. Any pitches? Viva la horde,

Chud 04/21/26 (Tue) 18:48:08 №15929161 [Quote]

How do we give the wikipetran jannies a reliable source for apostrophization? explain that it came from the soy/based/onions filter on 4chan, and soyposters would shorten soyjak to ‘jak to not get hit by the filter.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Soyjak

Chud 04/21/26 (Tue) 18:52:21 №15929186 [Quote]

>>15929161
well we would use 4chan archives as sources on our own wiki, i don't know if trannypedia jannies accept that

Chud 04/21/26 (Tue) 19:01:19 №15929273 [Quote]

>>15929186
>https://archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/123586056/#123586149
>it’s just jak now
no apostrophe, but close

Chud 04/21/26 (Tue) 19:07:11 №15929324 [Quote]

>>15929273
So from what i’ve seen, soyposters on /tv/ didnt even use apostrophization. It started in /qa/ during early 2021 and then passed over to other words