â„–15926065[Quote]
>Liberal feminist yapping about drug addict
Why is all Youtube content slop now
â„–15926075[Quote]
SISA
btw if Clavicular was a random sub 6 not a single foid would give a shit about him, the only reason everyone is bitching and moaning 24/7 about this dude is because he is the first .me user who broke containment
â„–15926081[Quote]
>>15926075^attractive .org user I meantI'm too much of an oldfag at this point
â„–15926086[Quote]
>>15926082More like 2019 .me primordial entity
â„–15926097[Quote]
>>15926086newnigger who will never know the hell us '89 usenets oldheads razed above me
â„–15926112[Quote]
>>15926097Bottom line is you will never have cute SISAs with a bitchy teacher attitude who make long video essays to complain about you while pretending not being deeply sexually and romantically attracted you because the bp is brootal
â„–15926127[Quote]
>>15926112The bottom line is I'm 56 years old, my golden years of usenet raping are far behind me and I've got a wife and 2 children
â„–15926156[Quote]
>>15926099>not knowing about .me/.org in big '26If you aren't looksmaxxing in this day and age what are you even doing with your life
â„–15926164[Quote]
>>15926156Being attractive
â„–15926167[Quote]
>>15926156I'm doing something called being naturally attractive and not insecure about my looks
â„–15926169[Quote]
What if you're dating a hot woman who loves you so so very much and is a virgin, do you still have to looksmax in 2k26
â„–15926181[Quote]
>>15926156Supporting white extinction, gooning to BBC and wearing my Clitty cage
â„–15926185[Quote]
>>15926164>>15926167I'm samefagging
>>15926156I'm also naturally attractive but if you don't know about shit like tret or fin you are at risk of aging out of your prime way earlier
Looksmaxxing is not only about improving your looks but also preserving them
â„–15926186[Quote]
>>15926169Yes otherwise she'll leave you for Tyrone's BBC
â„–15926192[Quote]
>>15926186But she got with me in the first place despite being ugly ahh hell and having infinitely many more options before me, wouldnt that disprove looksmaxxing
â„–15926196[Quote]
>>15926192But what about dat BBC?
â„–15926197[Quote]
>>15926196da BBC getting cucked by my BWC?
â„–15926200[Quote]
>>15926192No nigger, she could be with you to make you a emotional punching bag, for money, for attention. Just cause a foid is with you doesn't mean she finds you attractive and wants to have children with you.
â„–15926202[Quote]
>>15926200I'm a pleb, the lowest of the low of society, yet she still lubs me. She's had near limitless options, yet still chose me, would I still have to looksmax?
â„–15926205[Quote]
>>15926169Yes pretty much, the fact foids earn their own salary and often outearn male inkwells means they can afford to exclusively select for superficial traits in partners, this isn't some made up schizobabble it's the cold unfiltered reality.
â„–15926214[Quote]
>>15926205Yeah but that all applies to single woman and single men, im talking about a woman who already love love loves me
â„–15926221[Quote]
>>15926214If you are in a relationship good for you man, you are likely underestimating how attractive you really are.
If you want to gauge how much she loves you mention making children to them and see the face she makes, this is the ultimate test.
â„–15926222[Quote]
>>15926217this image was made by a known pedo sympathizer btw im trans btw
â„–15926231[Quote]
>>15926217'jakking does not get you laid or gain leverage on foids thoughbeit
â„–15926238[Quote]
>>15926222Broootal
>>15926231>Gaining leverage on foidsIf (You) really want a female companion that badly, get off the snappy. I for one am quite happy being here
â„–15926263[Quote]
girls can be soyjaks too
â„–15926275[Quote]
>>15926263>girls>soyjaksThey would be soyjills, albeit.