â„–15579794[Quote]
No true scottsman implies that trannies are real women btw
â„–15579850[Quote]
>>15579777 (OP)the second speaker in your example isn't using a no true scotsman fallacy. so by misrepresenting when people would actually call something a no true scotsman you're using a strawman argument
â„–15579865[Quote]
>>15579850That's quite litterally how no true scottsman works though
â„–15579949[Quote]
>>15579865No true scotsman would be more like this using your example:
>all sharks are pedophiles<but I know Henry who is a shark, and he isn't a pedophile>Henry isn't actually a shark. all REAL sharks are pedophiles â„–15580080[Quote]
>>15579949I commonly see it being used like in the OP though