Wikipedia was supposed to be a good idea in the early 2000s, but it failed due to overly strict rules on notability crippling niche hobby coverage forcing people to use the Ad heavy fandom instead and source blaklisting leading to one sided articles despit

Email
Subject
Comment
Verification	Please type the name of the object/variant:
File
Embed
Voice
Poll
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: 1773660196982.png 📥︎ (97.14 KB, 360x376) ImgOps

Chud 03/16/26 (Mon) 11:53:44 №15535526 [Quote]

Wikipedia was supposed to be a good idea in the early 2000s, but it failed due to overly strict rules on notability crippling niche hobby coverage forcing people to use the Ad heavy fandom instead and source blaklisting leading to one sided articles despite being "neutral". You can't be neutral when you exclude half the story.

AI relies on it to much as well, I can tell that AI uses wiki style grammar and it makes me feel that I'm just talking to a deranged Wikipedian when talking to a chatbot so I don't use AI anymore.

The internet would be better if every search engine delisted Wikipedia in favour of the original sources again. The Wikimedia foundation might collapse soon luckily, as adblockers now block their donation banners by default.

The Iran war was the final blow to Wikipedia, as they spent over 12 hours denying the death of the Iran leader when it was obvious to normal people.

Chud 03/16/26 (Mon) 11:54:14 №15535532 [Quote]

its just because they're trannies its not that deep

Syndromejak 03/16/26 (Mon) 11:54:26 №15535534 [Quote]

stfu asshole bigot forum user

Norwegian 03/16/26 (Mon) 11:54:26 №15535535 [Quote]

nigger

Chud 03/16/26 (Mon) 11:56:52 №15535548 [Quote]

>as they spent over 12 hours denying the death of the Iran leader when it was obvious to normal people.
Yes and that's probably because that's how long it took to gather enough reputable sources to confirm it. If they just let people write whatever with their own original research then wikipedia would be dogshit.
>The internet would be better if every search engine delisted Wikipedia in favour of the original sources again
Why? I think it would be worse.

Ishish 03/16/26 (Mon) 11:57:13 №15535552 [Quote]

File: 1769689943920w.png 📥︎ (8.92 KB, 454x520) ImgOps

i only use wikipedia for stuff related to tech and science since that stuff isnt political

no arrow since i look like this

Chudbob 03/16/26 (Mon) 12:33:14 №15535698 [Quote]

true

Chud 03/16/26 (Mon) 12:36:08 №15535711 [Quote]

>>15535555 (OP)