Chud 01/02/26 (Fri) 05:55:16 â„– 14662665 [Quote]
i mean its not complicated. there is low tier burgers (mcdonalds, wendys, checkers, ect) mid tier burgers (five guys, in n out, ) and high tier burgers (usually from a sit down style restaurant)
Chud 01/02/26 (Fri) 05:57:23 â„– 14662698 [Quote]
>>14662670 >eurocucks try not to chimp out and soyquote an american challenge difficulty: impossible
Cado 01/02/26 (Fri) 06:29:40 â„– 14662944 [Quote]
>>14662665 >in n out Glorified low tier. Culvers and Wendy's are better.
Chud 01/02/26 (Fri) 06:48:12 â„– 14663056 [Quote]
>>14662625 (OP) any burger with tartar sauce is already a gem
Applejak 01/02/26 (Fri) 07:07:58 â„– 14663186 [Quote]
rape amerishitskins
Chud 01/02/26 (Fri) 07:16:28 â„– 14663236 [Quote]
>>14663044 thats very clearly a mid tier burger, if the portions where larger it could easily be ranked as a low-high tier burger. the ingredients look good but plain/ lackluster. i dont see any butter on the bun or any juice coming from the meat.
Chud 01/02/26 (Fri) 07:17:23 â„– 14663243 [Quote]
>>14663236 Yeah I'm sorry I didn't take photos of the good burgers maybe my broski got one tho so I may ask him tomorrow
Dylanjak 01/02/26 (Fri) 07:17:56 â„– 14663248 [Quote]
>>14663236 honestly, even with larger portions i would not consider that to be a low-high tier burger, high-midtier instead