>>14587758 (OP)Mostly bad.
>>14587804It wouldn't surprise me. I called the delay to the end of next year like 6+ months ago. They need to get the game running well on current gen consoles and lower end hardware, because maybe 10% of people will easily be able to afford new hardware that can run it well in its current state. I'd even expect a significant graphical downgrade on console and a setting for super low graphics on PC. They need a stupidly high volume of sales right away just to recoup the ludicrous development cost, then the real way they plan to make big money is through microtransactions over the course of 10-15 years.