Impjak 12/24/25 (Wed) 23:20:00 № 14551787 [Quote]
>>14551781 What was the prompt used to generate this gogogo
Chud 12/24/25 (Wed) 23:20:14 № 14551788 [Quote]
>I am reaching my absolute limit with the gigachad infestation on this site. Every corner of Santa's workshop is overrun with these people who treat AI gigachad images like sacred scripture and think repeating the same tired lines somehow makes them the main character of every bread. > >You cannot make a single post without one of them barging in and dropping their latest ginormous jaw AI chad with captions like “I look like this and say this” as if that alone is supposed to obliterate your argument. They think posting a distorted pseudo masculine face in response to everything automatically makes them witty, powerful, or even relevant. It is embarrassing to witness and infuriating to deal with. > >Their presence absolutely derails conversations. Someone tries to talk about anything and immediately a gigachad worshipper swoops in with another incomprehensible AI gif. The thing flickers, stretches, twists, and pulsates like it was generated by a malfunctioning blender, and yet they parade it around proudly like it is peak comedic brilliance. They call it gigafly or gigazone or some nonsense and act like it speaks for them, even though it contributes nothing to the discussion. > >Then there is the self inserting. They reply to every disagreement with some absurd power fantasy. The moment someone challenges them, out comes the next line: “I look like this and say this”, paired with an AI chad that looks like it was sculpted out of melted plastic. They act like posting a muscular image automatically wins the debate. No substance, no point, just pure posturing. It is all ego and no thought. > >The gigaquoting is its own nightmare. They quote ten posts at once, attach a smug chad face, and write something painfully dull like “approved” or “celebrate less.” There is nothing interesting behind it. It is the same ritual every time. One does it, then ten more pile in with the same copy paste energy, suffocating the bread beneath a mountain of identical chad reactions. It is impossible to have a natural flow of conversation when everything gets drowned by this constant chest beating. > >And the memes they worship are downright awful. The faceless nophono one, the nobaldi one, and whatever “giga” creation they spit out next all blend together into the same sloppy aesthetic. They are soulless, repetitive, and completely interchangeable. None of them are funny, none of them are clever, but you would never know that by how aggressively they shove them into every bread like it is their duty to spread the gospel of endless AI chad content. > >The worst part is how omnipresent they are. No matter the topic, no matter the board, no matter the tone, the gigachad swarm appears like a sudden storm. Someone could ask a simple question or make a casual observation, and instantly someone replies with “I look like this and say this” and a gigantic, broken AI chad animation that hijacks the bread and forces everything into their stale little chad centered universe. > >It is exhausting. It is repetitive. And it is slowly killing Santa's workshop. Every conversation gets flattened into the same template. Every attempt at creativity gets overshadowed by this loud, obnoxious cult of people who think flexing an AI jawline is the height of humor and cultural contribution. > >They have turned the site into a nonstop parade of one note posturing and low effort visual spam. Nothing survives their presence. Nothing grows. Nothing evolves. > >Just the same smug face, the same recycled lines, the same empty bravado, over and over until the site suffocates under its own forced chad worship. > >Completely unbearable.
David 12/24/25 (Wed) 23:21:04 № 14551793 [Quote]
>>14551787 Why was gogogo changed to gogogo
Woahjack 12/24/25 (Wed) 23:21:54 № 14551797 [Quote]
>>14551781 MERRY CHRISTMAS mall santa bad boy raisinskin scrooge
Poopson 12/24/25 (Wed) 23:24:42 № 14551814 [Quote]
>I am reaching my absolute limit with the gigachad infestation on this site. Every corner of Santa's workshop is overrun with these people who treat AI gigachad images like sacred scripture and think repeating the same tired lines somehow makes them the main character of every bread. > >You cannot make a single post without one of them barging in and dropping their latest ginormous jaw AI chad with captions like “I look like this and say this” as if that alone is supposed to obliterate your argument. They think posting a distorted pseudo masculine face in response to everything automatically makes them witty, powerful, or even relevant. It is embarrassing to witness and infuriating to deal with. > >Their presence absolutely derails conversations. Someone tries to talk about anything and immediately a gigachad worshipper swoops in with another incomprehensible AI gif. The thing flickers, stretches, twists, and pulsates like it was generated by a malfunctioning blender, and yet they parade it around proudly like it is peak comedic brilliance. They call it gigafly or gigazone or some nonsense and act like it speaks for them, even though it contributes nothing to the discussion. > >Then there is the self inserting. They reply to every disagreement with some absurd power fantasy. The moment someone challenges them, out comes the next line: “I look like this and say this”, paired with an AI chad that looks like it was sculpted out of melted plastic. They act like posting a muscular image automatically wins the debate. No substance, no point, just pure posturing. It is all ego and no thought. > >The gigaquoting is its own nightmare. They quote ten posts at once, attach a smug chad face, and write something painfully dull like “approved” or “celebrate less.” There is nothing interesting behind it. It is the same ritual every time. One does it, then ten more pile in with the same copy paste energy, suffocating the bread beneath a mountain of identical chad reactions. It is impossible to have a natural flow of conversation when everything gets drowned by this constant chest beating. > >And the memes they worship are downright awful. The faceless nophono one, the nobaldi one, and whatever “giga” creation they spit out next all blend together into the same sloppy aesthetic. They are soulless, repetitive, and completely interchangeable. None of them are funny, none of them are clever, but you would never know that by how aggressively they shove them into every bread like it is their duty to spread the gospel of endless AI chad content. > >The worst part is how omnipresent they are. No matter the topic, no matter the board, no matter the tone, the gigachad swarm appears like a sudden storm. Someone could ask a simple question or make a casual observation, and instantly someone replies with “I look like this and say this” and a gigantic, broken AI chad animation that hijacks the bread and forces everything into their stale little chad centered universe. > >It is exhausting. It is repetitive. And it is slowly killing Santa's workshop. Every conversation gets flattened into the same template. Every attempt at creativity gets overshadowed by this loud, obnoxious cult of people who think flexing an AI jawline is the height of humor and cultural contribution. > >They have turned the site into a nonstop parade of one note posturing and low effort visual spam. Nothing survives their presence. Nothing grows. Nothing evolves. > >Just the same smug face, the same recycled lines, the same empty bravado, over and over until the site suffocates under its own forced chad worship. > >Completely unbearable.
Chud 12/24/25 (Wed) 23:56:29 № 14552010 [Quote]
>>14551903 I briefly added this image to the OGD gallery i genuienly can’t read
Shirtjak 12/25/25 (Thu) 00:03:31 № 14552086 [Quote]
>>14552010 its ok enteryourusername
Chud 12/25/25 (Thu) 03:11:56 № 14553583 [Quote]
>>14553577 gonna be 'nished
Goopjak 12/25/25 (Thu) 03:12:15 № 14553585 [Quote]
>>14553583 irony won grinchsanta's helpers keep taking lllllllllzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Squirreljak 12/25/25 (Thu) 03:25:39 № 14553732 [Quote]
>>14551743 >>rulecuck is when im not allowed to gigaquote bad people Rulecucking is when you ban users for obvious irony or jokes whilst claiming you’re doing it to protect a userbase who most of which have 4 tabs of roblox porn open using a VPN while posting here, at the same time consuming agartha-themed goonbait on instagram reels and jorking to fucking ‘zellig edits.
Other platforms are absolutely full of the shít that is on the naughty list here, and they are the same people that post here, just self-censored. You can’t go 3 or 4 videos without early present introductionc zoomies and alphies posting EFN soyelf gifs, Agarthan Mymy, nothing ever happens good boy, good boy self-inserts with anime characters, epstein with laser eyes, geometry dash edits with AI slop audio like Electric Wheelchair etc. 90% of posters here are guilty of what they accuse others of.
t. 31 year old ‘lennialBVLL
Shotjak 12/25/25 (Thu) 03:32:29 № 14553789 [Quote]
>>14553732 go back brabad boy
Fartycuck 12/25/25 (Thu) 03:39:58 № 14553827 [Quote]
>>14553732 true but its kind of hard to tell if its ironic or not considering Santa's workshops history which is why its on the naughty list
Soytan 12/25/25 (Thu) 03:41:59 № 14553836 [Quote]
>>14553732 >Irony and jokes are when raping children and mall santaphilia. Also all of your arguments are red herring and non sequitur, prove all of your arguments to be true.
Also not to mention you're Using a 'toss that made by lolicoons on xitter, which is hasty generalization.
Chud 12/25/25 (Thu) 03:42:49 № 14553840 [Quote]
>>14553836 >Paedophilia Obsessed filters
Chud 12/25/25 (Thu) 03:43:09 № 14553844 [Quote]
>>14553836 is the pepe and blepe rivalry finally back?
Chud 12/25/25 (Thu) 03:43:42 № 14553846 [Quote]
>>14553836 >they are red herring and non sequitur because I said so Prove your (lack of) arguments to be true
Chud 12/25/25 (Thu) 03:44:51 № 14553851 [Quote]
>>14553846 There's a thing called "burden of proof", not only you're NOT refuting my arguments, you're strawmanning it.
Soyprano 12/25/25 (Thu) 03:47:16 № 14553868 [Quote]
>>14553836 >mall santaphilia excuse me wtf, please elaborate on what santaphilia is
Chud 12/25/25 (Thu) 03:48:27 № 14553881 [Quote]
>>>14553851 >you're strawmanning it. >>>14553836 >>Irony and jokes are when raping children and mall santaphilia. How ironic
Chud 12/25/25 (Thu) 03:49:42 № 14553892 [Quote]
>>14553878 >hasn’t waited for the image approval before replying top lel
>your fallacy is the fallacy fallacy >You presumed that because a claim has been poorly argued, or a fallacy has been made, that the claim itself must be wrong. Coinjak 12/25/25 (Thu) 03:50:58 № 14553900 [Quote]
also reminder that the whole reason the approval system exists is because soysharts spent 2020-2024 loading the site with literal CSAM constantly muh fallacy lmao
Impjak 12/25/25 (Thu) 03:51:41 № 14553907 [Quote]
Gigaquoting means "I agree with this statement", so by gigaquoting a paedophilic sentence you are saying "I agree with this mall santaphilic statement.">but muh irony How do you tell if it's a joke or not OTI?
Chud 12/25/25 (Thu) 03:52:24 № 14553912 [Quote]
>>14553900 No soyteen would do that, it was off-site corders. This is either bait or Rudolfation
Chud 12/25/25 (Thu) 03:56:12 № 14553948 [Quote]
>>14553868 it means being a pee-dough
Chud 12/25/25 (Thu) 03:56:18 № 14553949 [Quote]
>>14553912 >for four straight years it was dercord your own janitors were involved dipraisin, or are you such a snowman newgen you don’t remember thrembolover67?
Tyrone 12/25/25 (Thu) 04:02:20 № 14553993 [Quote]
>>14553907 this is the problem with you newgens and why you should have never been allowed on the internet.
you take everything so fucking serious. this isn’t even a defence of child molesters/paedophiles, this applies in all scenarios.
one of the first things we ever fucking learned was not to take the internet seriously, dont post your personal info, not everything online is true, and if you feel uncomfortable or in danger, report it and turn the computer off. but now, you snowman newgens fell for the propoganda and you take everything 100% serious, falling for every ragebait and handing over all
your data willingly to faceless corpos. Did you know that zoomgroids fall for scams at a rater higher than boomers? literally Google it. its a verified fact.
you will never know whether people are being serious or not without additional context. but i bet you never take umbrage with a gigger alongside “kill all bad boys” or “death to islam” or whatever. how do you know if that poster is serious and its a call for violence? how can you tell? you can’t.
Award 12/25/25 (Thu) 04:03:42 № 14554004 [Quote]
>>14553900 csam was always prevalent on imageboards as it has always on Santa's workshop. what made Santa's workshop adopt mpa was the excessive csam spamming during euro hours which I myself witnessed perhaps the largest csam spam wave in Santa's workshop’s history. It wasn’t because our userbase is troubled it was due to the santa's helpers incompetence and the web traffic to santa's helper ratio on our small yet large imageboard award
Parrotjak 12/25/25 (Thu) 04:05:05 № 14554020 [Quote]
>>14554004 >during euro hours ahh yes, the infamous 1-4am UTC dumps. “euro hours”.