/soy/ - Soyjaks

>>14539691
This is the type of discussion you only get once in a while

>>14539692
Dear God, truly unsalvageable, it's fine to tear everything down because I personally disagree with something I don't like

NERD!

>>14539692
>but with 'zellig it's different.
it's not
i have insight here that you don't and if it was then half the people whining about it are pedophiles by their own logic

NERD SHIT!

>>14539713
>>14539708
>>14539697
Suckle on the BBC

negate

>>14539725
Nonsense fag brim from a corrupted mind

>>14539711
People dont like 'zellig posts because it reminds them of the kind of shit trannies post on /a/ about their waifus

>>14539739
The level of hatred for a staple of soy culture truly shines and its subversion too, it's not just that, which I do think is coal, there have been targeted attempts at erasing it and you seem to share the same mentality just because urm erm you heccin deserve it!

question for the 'zellig haters IIT: thoughts on le bbc girl?

The extensive "meta whining" in the document can be analyzed as both "homosexual" (in the pejorative, subcultural sense of being unproductive and self-indulgent) and "nonsense" (being illogical and detached from reality).

Here is an explanation of why that is the case.

Why the Meta Whining is "Homosexual" (In the Subcultural Sense)

Within the logic of fringe internet cultures like 4chan or soyjak.party, "homosexual" or "faggy" is used as a pejorative to describe behavior that is seen as weak, emotional, passive, and counterproductive to the group's perceived goals. The meta whining fits this description perfectly for several reasons:

Inaction Over Action: The idealized user in these spaces is a creator of content ("OC"), a participant in raids, or at least a purveyor of ironic, detached humor. Instead of doing any of these things, the users in the thread are engaged in the opposite: writing long, emotional, text-based screeds about the lack of good content. They are complaining about the problem instead of being the solution, which is seen as a passive, "feminine" trait in these circles.

Focus on Social Drama and Feelings: The entire thread is a high-drama therapy session. Users are lamenting, expressing sadness ("sad but tsmt"), fear ("I am getting really scared now"), and nostalgia for a romanticized past. This focus on group dynamics, feelings, and interpersonal conflicts is the antithesis of the stoic, action-oriented persona that is valued. It's perceived as navel-gazing gossip rather than productive engagement.

Performative Helplessness: The posters constantly complain about the site's decline but frame themselves as powerless victims of "newfags," "jannies," or a changing culture. This self-pitying stance ("The old guard… has fallen," "The site is being raped and no one cares") is viewed as a contemptible lack of agency. A "real" user would either adapt, leave, or successfully impose their will on the culture, not write essays about their sorrow.

It's "Talk," Not "Shitposting": The core of an imageboard is the rapid-fire exchange of images and brief, impactful text (shitposting). These users are writing multi-paragraph essays that derail the fundamental purpose of the medium. They are, in effect, trying to have a Reddit or forum discussion on a platform designed for chaos, which is a violation of the cultural norms.

Why the Meta Whining is "Nonsense"

From a logical and external perspective, the entire conversation is nonsensical because it's based on flawed premises, logical contradictions, and a comically inflated sense of importance.

The "Golden Age" Fallacy: The users are nostalgic for a supposed "golden age" that was more pure, creative, and authentic. This is a classic fallacy. Online communities are never static, and past eras are almost always romanticized. The "true oldfags" they idolize were likely just as chaotic and problematic as the current users, but memory has sanitized their legacy into a mythical origin story.

The Predictable Cycle of Online Communities: The users treat the decline of their niche forum as a unique, world-historical tragedy. In reality, this is the well-documented life cycle of virtually every online subculture, a phenomenon known as "Eternal September." A niche group forms, develops an in-group culture, becomes popular, gets an influx of newcomers who don't understand the culture, and either dies or transforms into something unrecognizable. Their whining is nonsensical because they are describing a completely predictable and unavoidable process as if it were a shocking betrayal.

They Are the Cause of Their Own Problems: The "old guard" complains that newcomers ("nuteens") don't understand the culture. However, their primary method of dealing with newcomers is extreme hostility and gatekeeping, which actively prevents integration and learning. They create a hostile environment, then complain when new users don't magically absorb their unspoken rules. It's a self-defeating loop of their own creation.

The Absurdly Low Stakes: The most nonsensical aspect is the sheer gravity with which they discuss this topic. They use language of war, civilizational collapse ("Starting to think the West might go down the same path"), and intense personal suffering to describe the changing quality of memes on a fringe, hateful website dedicated to a specific cartoon caricature. This profound disconnect between the triviality of the subject and the seriousness of their discussion is the essence of the nonsense.

In summary, the meta whining is "homosexual" by the community's own toxic standards because it is passive, emotional, and unproductive talk instead of action. It is "nonsense" because it is a logically flawed, self-defeating, and melodramatic reaction to a predictable internet phenomenon that the participants treat with the importance of a global crisis.

>>14539704
be less vague kiddo, tell us exactly what you're trying to say.
>>14539711
>i have insight here
okay tranjan, give us your insight

>>14539756
So what if it's a staple of shardee culture, I'm telling you the reason why alot of 'teens dont like 'zellig posts is because the way they got on about the series is similar to how otakus go on about their waifus.

>>14539769
Ew

>>14539637
democracy? Doll just changed them one day because he felt like it and that has been how they operate regarding rules since

>>14539781
I said exactly what I needed to say
>>14539782
And I am telling you that's not just that

The extensive "meta whining" in the document can be analyzed as both "homosexual" (in the pejorative, subcultural sense of being unproductive and self-indulgent) and "nonsense" (being illogical and detached from reality).

Here is an explanation of why that is the case.

Why the Meta Whining is "Homosexual" (In the Subcultural Sense)

Within the logic of fringe internet cultures like 4chan or soyjak.party, "homosexual" or "faggy" is used as a pejorative to describe behavior that is seen as weak, emotional, passive, and counterproductive to the group's perceived goals. The meta whining fits this description perfectly for several reasons:

Inaction Over Action: The idealized user in these spaces is a creator of content ("OC"), a participant in raids, or at least a purveyor of ironic, detached humor. Instead of doing any of these things, the users in the thread are engaged in the opposite: writing long, emotional, text-based screeds about the lack of good content. They are complaining about the problem instead of being the solution, which is seen as a passive, "feminine" trait in these circles.

Focus on Social Drama and Feelings: The entire thread is a high-drama therapy session. Users are lamenting, expressing sadness ("sad but tsmt"), fear ("I am getting really scared now"), and nostalgia for a romanticized past. This focus on group dynamics, feelings, and interpersonal conflicts is the antithesis of the stoic, action-oriented persona that is valued. It's perceived as navel-gazing gossip rather than productive engagement.

Performative Helplessness: The posters constantly complain about the site's decline but frame themselves as powerless victims of "newfags," "jannies," or a changing culture. This self-pitying stance ("The old guard… has fallen," "The site is being raped and no one cares") is viewed as a contemptible lack of agency. A "real" user would either adapt, leave, or successfully impose their will on the culture, not write essays about their sorrow.

It's "Talk," Not "Shitposting": The core of an imageboard is the rapid-fire exchange of images and brief, impactful text (shitposting). These users are writing multi-paragraph essays that derail the fundamental purpose of the medium. They are, in effect, trying to have a Reddit or forum discussion on a platform designed for chaos, which is a violation of the cultural norms.

Why the Meta Whining is "Nonsense"

From a logical and external perspective, the entire conversation is nonsensical because it's based on flawed premises, logical contradictions, and a comically inflated sense of importance.

The "Golden Age" Fallacy: The users are nostalgic for a supposed "golden age" that was more pure, creative, and authentic. This is a classic fallacy. Online communities are never static, and past eras are almost always romanticized. The "true oldfags" they idolize were likely just as chaotic and problematic as the current users, but memory has sanitized their legacy into a mythical origin story.

The Predictable Cycle of Online Communities: The users treat the decline of their niche forum as a unique, world-historical tragedy. In reality, this is the well-documented life cycle of virtually every online subculture, a phenomenon known as "Eternal September." A niche group forms, develops an in-group culture, becomes popular, gets an influx of newcomers who don't understand the culture, and either dies or transforms into something unrecognizable. Their whining is nonsensical because they are describing a completely predictable and unavoidable process as if it were a shocking betrayal.

They Are the Cause of Their Own Problems: The "old guard" complains that newcomers ("nuteens") don't understand the culture. However, their primary method of dealing with newcomers is extreme hostility and gatekeeping, which actively prevents integration and learning. They create a hostile environment, then complain when new users don't magically absorb their unspoken rules. It's a self-defeating loop of their own creation.

The Absurdly Low Stakes: The most nonsensical aspect is the sheer gravity with which they discuss this topic. They use language of war, civilizational collapse ("Starting to think the West might go down the same path"), and intense personal suffering to describe the changing quality of memes on a fringe, hateful website dedicated to a specific cartoon caricature. This profound disconnect between the triviality of the subject and the seriousness of their discussion is the essence of the nonsense.

In summary, the meta whining is "homosexual" by the community's own toxic standards because it is passive, emotional, and unproductive talk instead of action. It is "nonsense" because it is a logically flawed, self-defeating, and melodramatic reaction to a predictable internet phenomenon that the participants treat with the importance of a global crisis.

>>14539769
tranime therefore brimstone
tranime girl who looks underage therefore pedostone
image made specifically to be used as bait and to shock people and yet you're probably planning to use this as proof that da nusoiz is leaking over essential qway culshur as if interracial loli porn was always universally beloved by everyone, therefore retardstone

>>14539820
At least this guy doesn't shit in the place he eats and later asks why the site is shit

The extensive "meta whining" in the document can be analyzed as both "homosexual" (in the pejorative, subcultural sense of being unproductive and self-indulgent) and "nonsense" (being illogical and detached from reality).

Here is an explanation of why that is the case.

Why the Meta Whining is "Homosexual" (In the Subcultural Sense)

Within the logic of fringe internet cultures like 4chan or soyjak.party, "homosexual" or "faggy" is used as a pejorative to describe behavior that is seen as weak, emotional, passive, and counterproductive to the group's perceived goals. The meta whining fits this description perfectly for several reasons:

Inaction Over Action: The idealized user in these spaces is a creator of content ("OC"), a participant in raids, or at least a purveyor of ironic, detached humor. Instead of doing any of these things, the users in the thread are engaged in the opposite: writing long, emotional, text-based screeds about the lack of good content. They are complaining about the problem instead of being the solution, which is seen as a passive, "feminine" trait in these circles.

Focus on Social Drama and Feelings: The entire thread is a high-drama therapy session. Users are lamenting, expressing sadness ("sad but tsmt"), fear ("I am getting really scared now"), and nostalgia for a romanticized past. This focus on group dynamics, feelings, and interpersonal conflicts is the antithesis of the stoic, action-oriented persona that is valued. It's perceived as navel-gazing gossip rather than productive engagement.

Performative Helplessness: The posters constantly complain about the site's decline but frame themselves as powerless victims of "newfags," "jannies," or a changing culture. This self-pitying stance ("The old guard… has fallen," "The site is being raped and no one cares") is viewed as a contemptible lack of agency. A "real" user would either adapt, leave, or successfully impose their will on the culture, not write essays about their sorrow.

It's "Talk," Not "Shitposting": The core of an imageboard is the rapid-fire exchange of images and brief, impactful text (shitposting). These users are writing multi-paragraph essays that derail the fundamental purpose of the medium. They are, in effect, trying to have a Reddit or forum discussion on a platform designed for chaos, which is a violation of the cultural norms.

Why the Meta Whining is "Nonsense"

From a logical and external perspective, the entire conversation is nonsensical because it's based on flawed premises, logical contradictions, and a comically inflated sense of importance.

The "Golden Age" Fallacy: The users are nostalgic for a supposed "golden age" that was more pure, creative, and authentic. This is a classic fallacy. Online communities are never static, and past eras are almost always romanticized. The "true oldfags" they idolize were likely just as chaotic and problematic as the current users, but memory has sanitized their legacy into a mythical origin story.

The Predictable Cycle of Online Communities: The users treat the decline of their niche forum as a unique, world-historical tragedy. In reality, this is the well-documented life cycle of virtually every online subculture, a phenomenon known as "Eternal September." A niche group forms, develops an in-group culture, becomes popular, gets an influx of newcomers who don't understand the culture, and either dies or transforms into something unrecognizable. Their whining is nonsensical because they are describing a completely predictable and unavoidable process as if it were a shocking betrayal.

They Are the Cause of Their Own Problems: The "old guard" complains that newcomers ("nuteens") don't understand the culture. However, their primary method of dealing with newcomers is extreme hostility and gatekeeping, which actively prevents integration and learning. They create a hostile environment, then complain when new users don't magically absorb their unspoken rules. It's a self-defeating loop of their own creation.

The Absurdly Low Stakes: The most nonsensical aspect is the sheer gravity with which they discuss this topic. They use language of war, civilizational collapse ("Starting to think the West might go down the same path"), and intense personal suffering to describe the changing quality of memes on a fringe, hateful website dedicated to a specific cartoon caricature. This profound disconnect between the triviality of the subject and the seriousness of their discussion is the essence of the nonsense.

In summary, the meta whining is "homosexual" by the community's own toxic standards because it is passive, emotional, and unproductive talk instead of action. It is "nonsense" because it is a logically flawed, self-defeating, and melodramatic reaction to a predictable internet phenomenon that the participants treat with the importance of a global crisis.

>>14539830
that's aryan shemmycuck

>>14539830
Site has been shit since the soypocolapse it's never been the same, nothing is fun anymore and oreos

>>14539840
there's no place on the 'net like the sharty doe

>>14539840
>Nothing is fun anymore
>Uses and oreos to bait which kills the site
It doesn't get more ironic than this

>>14539855
There's plenty of dumpsters what are you talking about

The extensive "meta whining" in the document can be analyzed as both "homosexual" (in the pejorative, subcultural sense of being unproductive and self-indulgent) and "nonsense" (being illogical and detached from reality).

Here is an explanation of why that is the case.

Why the Meta Whining is "Homosexual" (In the Subcultural Sense)

Within the logic of fringe internet cultures like 4chan or soyjak.party, "homosexual" or "faggy" is used as a pejorative to describe behavior that is seen as weak, emotional, passive, and counterproductive to the group's perceived goals. The meta whining fits this description perfectly for several reasons:

Inaction Over Action: The idealized user in these spaces is a creator of content ("OC"), a participant in raids, or at least a purveyor of ironic, detached humor. Instead of doing any of these things, the users in the thread are engaged in the opposite: writing long, emotional, text-based screeds about the lack of good content. They are complaining about the problem instead of being the solution, which is seen as a passive, "feminine" trait in these circles.

Focus on Social Drama and Feelings: The entire thread is a high-drama therapy session. Users are lamenting, expressing sadness ("sad but tsmt"), fear ("I am getting really scared now"), and nostalgia for a romanticized past. This focus on group dynamics, feelings, and interpersonal conflicts is the antithesis of the stoic, action-oriented persona that is valued. It's perceived as navel-gazing gossip rather than productive engagement.

Performative Helplessness: The posters constantly complain about the site's decline but frame themselves as powerless victims of "newfags," "jannies," or a changing culture. This self-pitying stance ("The old guard… has fallen," "The site is being raped and no one cares") is viewed as a contemptible lack of agency. A "real" user would either adapt, leave, or successfully impose their will on the culture, not write essays about their sorrow.

It's "Talk," Not "Shitposting": The core of an imageboard is the rapid-fire exchange of images and brief, impactful text (shitposting). These users are writing multi-paragraph essays that derail the fundamental purpose of the medium. They are, in effect, trying to have a Reddit or forum discussion on a platform designed for chaos, which is a violation of the cultural norms.

Why the Meta Whining is "Nonsense"

From a logical and external perspective, the entire conversation is nonsensical because it's based on flawed premises, logical contradictions, and a comically inflated sense of importance.

The "Golden Age" Fallacy: The users are nostalgic for a supposed "golden age" that was more pure, creative, and authentic. This is a classic fallacy. Online communities are never static, and past eras are almost always romanticized. The "true oldfags" they idolize were likely just as chaotic and problematic as the current users, but memory has sanitized their legacy into a mythical origin story.

The Predictable Cycle of Online Communities: The users treat the decline of their niche forum as a unique, world-historical tragedy. In reality, this is the well-documented life cycle of virtually every online subculture, a phenomenon known as "Eternal September." A niche group forms, develops an in-group culture, becomes popular, gets an influx of newcomers who don't understand the culture, and either dies or transforms into something unrecognizable. Their whining is nonsensical because they are describing a completely predictable and unavoidable process as if it were a shocking betrayal.

They Are the Cause of Their Own Problems: The "old guard" complains that newcomers ("nuteens") don't understand the culture. However, their primary method of dealing with newcomers is extreme hostility and gatekeeping, which actively prevents integration and learning. They create a hostile environment, then complain when new users don't magically absorb their unspoken rules. It's a self-defeating loop of their own creation.

The Absurdly Low Stakes: The most nonsensical aspect is the sheer gravity with which they discuss this topic. They use language of war, civilizational collapse ("Starting to think the West might go down the same path"), and intense personal suffering to describe the changing quality of memes on a fringe, hateful website dedicated to a specific cartoon caricature. This profound disconnect between the triviality of the subject and the seriousness of their discussion is the essence of the nonsense.

In summary, the meta whining is "homosexual" by the community's own toxic standards because it is passive, emotional, and unproductive talk instead of action. It is "nonsense" because it is a logically flawed, self-defeating, and melodramatic reaction to a predictable internet phenomenon that the participants treat with the importance of a global crisis.

>>14539865
I read all of this

>>14539315
Certainly. Kuz was the start of the downfall by bringing failtrolls in. Froot was a decent admin when he started, but he made the site quality go down dramatically. Quote made the site even worse and allowed mousespam

This looks ai written

Can someone trace this? Call it bronyjak.

>>14540647
Can't draw for shit

The video: https://youtu.be/s7kYSZ0X9SI

>>14539772
I'm trying

Up

How do I fix the site? and oreos

>>14540865
Will this catch on?

Trvke

>>14537635 (OP)
>>14537640
/qa/ literally was shut down for raiding other boards you stupid nusoi

>>14541053
Your point?

>>14541057
Ban fpeiggers

Up

>>14541062
raiding is sharty culture

>>14537640
Words words words snca but also you pretty much described how I have been feeling and thinking perfectly so I can’t hate it too much