Chud 12/21/25 (Sun) 15:39:49 № 14511481 [Quote]
impgem
Chud 12/21/25 (Sun) 15:40:22 № 14511491 [Quote]
bumo prevents thread from getting saged
Poopson 12/21/25 (Sun) 15:40:41 № 14511494 [Quote]
bumo is stronger
Chud 12/21/25 (Sun) 15:41:00 № 14511499 [Quote]
bumo announces it
Yurjak 12/21/25 (Sun) 15:41:23 № 14511505 [Quote]
this site would be better if bump and supersage were removed
Wojak 12/21/25 (Sun) 15:44:53 № 14511547 [Quote]
putting bump in the email field makes janny bump the thread for you, so its like you posted twice
Applejak 12/21/25 (Sun) 15:47:47 № 14511570 [Quote]
Yeah but a bump is already the maximum bump you can have; a double bump doesn’t do any more than a single bump, right?
Chudbob 12/21/25 (Sun) 15:49:49 № 14511586 [Quote]
>>14511505 DO NOT REMOVE SUPER SAGE!
Chud 12/21/25 (Sun) 15:50:40 № 14511592 [Quote]
>>14511586 All it does is incentivize people to react to bait
Chud 12/21/25 (Sun) 16:02:54 № 14511687 [Quote]
It sounds like you’re diving into the world of online forums or marketplaces where "bumping" a thread is the standard way to keep a post at the top of the feed. You’ve hit on a classic piece of internet redundancy: the "BUMP" (Bring Up My Post) comment. If every reply already moves the thread to the top, why bother typing the word at all? Here is the breakdown of why people still do it: ### 1. The "Ghost Town" Fix In many forum algorithms, a thread only stays relevant if it has recent activity. If nobody is actually discussing the topic but the user wants to keep the post visible (like a "For Sale" listing or a technical question), they "bump" it themselves. It’s a manual way to say, *"Hey, I’m still here and I still need an answer/buyer."* ### 2. Algorithmic "Weight" On some older forum software (like vBulletin or XenForo), not all replies are created equal. While any reply moves the thread to page one, a thread with a high volume of "activity" (even just bumps) might be flagged as "Hot" or "Trending," giving it a special icon or keeping it in a sidebar widget. ### 3. Visibility Without Substance Sometimes, people reply with "Bump" because they want to support the original poster (OP) but have nothing of value to add to the conversation. It’s a low-effort way to help a friend or a good cause stay on the front page without cluttering the thread with irrelevant chat. ### 4. Tradition and Habit Internet culture is built on "legacy" behaviors. Even on platforms where the algorithm is much more complex than a simple chronological sort, users who grew up on 2000s-era message boards still type "bump" out of habit. —The Downside: You’re right to be skeptical. In many modern communities (like Reddit), "bumping" doesn't work the same way. In fact, many subreddits or Discord servers consider "pointless bumping" to be spam , because it adds noise without adding signal. > Pro Tip: If you're trying to get attention on a post, a "meaningful bump" (adding a new detail, a price drop, or a follow-up question) is always more effective than just typing the word. Would you like me to look into the specific rules of a certain platform or forum to see if "bumping" actually helps there?