they're using it to distort the truth about our controversies and make us look like groomers and school shooter endorsers.>users of the Soyjak Party forum had claimed that he had been groomed into the committing the attack through interactions with other

Email
Subject
Comment
File
Embed
Voice
Poll
Password	(For file deletion.)

the wikipedia article on us was a mistake Beastjak 12/11/25 (Thu) 23:27:03 №14383008 [View All][1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][Quote]

they're using it to distort the truth about our controversies and make us look like groomers and school shooter endorsers.
>users of the Soyjak Party forum had claimed that he had been groomed into the committing the attack through interactions with other users on the website.
how do you even groom someone on an anonymous imageboard where you can't know which person is which? you can concede that he used this site, but he was groomed by offsite groups inside shitcord, rendering the sharty uninvolved with the shooting itself.
the solomon section is also biased, not only because it implies this site is directly responsible for what happened, but also because the shit-eating jannies at wikipedia are using SOYBOORU COMMENTS as "reliable" information for the article, yet they won't allow the soyjak wiki to be utilized in the same way (see picrel 1). this is contradictory with wikipedia's own standards as both sites are not a reliable source of information according to their own guide. when you break these standards, it's only fair if you let other editors do the same, which is why you need to live up to them.
the individual who wrote that comment mentioned on the photo could very well be falseflagging or baiting, noting that soybooru is not a serious site at all.
the sharty should've never dared to create an article dedicated to itself on this shitty power-tripping janny haven of a website. now it'll be used by said jannies to make us look like pedophiles and terrorists.

734 posts and 147 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:11:35 №14389235 [Quote]

File: 1763571111555s.GIF 📥︎ (2.75 MB, 374x625) ImgOps

>they're using it to distort the truth about our controversies and make us look like groomers and school shooter endorsers.
>>users of the Soyjak Party forum had claimed that he had been groomed into the committing the attack through interactions with other users on the website.
>how do you even groom someone on an anonymous imageboard where you can't know which person is which? you can concede that he used this site, but he was groomed by offsite groups inside shitcord, rendering the sharty uninvolved with the shooting itself.
>the solomon section is also biased, not only because it implies this site is directly responsible for what happened, but also because the shit-eating jannies at wikipedia are using SOYBOORU COMMENTS as "reliable" information for the article, yet they won't allow the soyjak wiki to be utilized in the same way (see picrel 1). this is contradictory with wikipedia's own standards as both sites are not a reliable source of information according to their own guide. when you break these standards, it's only fair if you let other editors do the same, which is why you need to live up to them.
>the individual who wrote that comment mentioned on the photo could very well be falseflagging or baiting, noting that soybooru is not a serious site at all.
>the sharty should've never dared to create an article dedicated to itself on this shitty power-tripping janny haven of a website. now it'll be used by said jannies to make us look like pedophiles and terrorists.

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:14:02 №14389240 [Quote]

File: 1764523723565r.png 📥︎ (29.31 KB, 1024x1024) ImgOps

>>they're using it to distort the truth about our controversies and make us look like groomers and school shooter endorsers.
>>>users of the Soyjak Party forum had claimed that he had been groomed into the committing the attack through interactions with other users on the website.
>>how do you even groom someone on an anonymous imageboard where you can't know which person is which? you can concede that he used this site, but he was groomed by offsite groups inside shitcord, rendering the sharty uninvolved with the shooting itself.
>>the solomon section is also biased, not only because it implies this site is directly responsible for what happened, but also because the shit-eating jannies at wikipedia are using SOYBOORU COMMENTS as "reliable" information for the article, yet they won't allow the soyjak wiki to be utilized in the same way (see picrel 1). this is contradictory with wikipedia's own standards as both sites are not a reliable source of information according to their own guide. when you break these standards, it's only fair if you let other editors do the same, which is why you need to live up to them.
>>the individual who wrote that comment mentioned on the photo could very well be falseflagging or baiting, noting that soybooru is not a serious site at all.
>>the sharty should've never dared to create an article dedicated to itself on this shitty power-tripping janny haven of a website. now it'll be used by said jannies to make us look like pedophiles and terrorists.

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:14:42 №14389244 [Quote]

>>14389235
hello there that one snitching mod that is obsessed with us, its been a while.

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:15:29 №14389252 [Quote]

>>14389196
fuck is this shit nigga

Jackob 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:16:22 №14389259 [Quote]

>>14389252
this is what you will look like in 2026

Raisinskin 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:16:26 №14389260 [Quote]

File: 1761672066265z.gif 📥︎ (610.84 KB, 320x320) ImgOps

>>14389244
>YOU ARE MY PERSONAL BOOGEYMAN SENT FROM DA FUGGEN JERDEE

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:16:56 №14389262 [Quote]

>>14389260
sentient nameroll

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:17:32 №14389268 [Quote]

>>14388029
tsmt

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:17:51 №14389272 [Quote]

Go up

Tyrone 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:17:52 №14389273 [Quote]

File: 1762372506906f.gif 📥︎ (6.8 MB, 400x267) ImgOps

YOU ARE MY PERSONAL BOOGEYMAN SENT FROM DA FUGGEN JERDEE

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:18:45 №14389277 [Quote]

U[p

Darkiplier 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:18:54 №14389279 [Quote]

Go up

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:20:53 №14389287 [Quote]

Go down

Coinjak 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:23:22 №14389296 [Quote]

>>14383560
Can you send the debunk please?

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:24:21 №14389300 [Quote]

>>14383560
everyone saying not to 'ox is a glowie faggot. 'ox this dumb nigger now and send him some 'za

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:24:59 №14389303 [Quote]

go down

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:25:09 №14389304 [Quote]

Go up

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:25:28 №14389305 [Quote]

>>14389300
its just like those "we are not your personal army, lurk moar" posts

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:26:13 №14389310 [Quote]

>>14383280
Troon doesn't that shittone of wiki pages have porn in them gegg

Colorjak 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:26:48 №14389313 [Quote]

shartycucks are groomers though lmfao

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:27:16 №14389316 [Quote]

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (109.14 KB, 1062x773) ImgOps

internet footprint detected in one jewgle..

Jackob 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:27:34 №14389317 [Quote]

>>14389313
hello again admin sar, i see you have studied the soykultzer and found out about the HTSM

Bobson 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:27:59 №14389318 [Quote]

File: 1762727288171i.png 📥︎ (150.8 KB, 432x578) ImgOps

>>>14383538
>>>14383536
>come on guys not everything needs a ‘ox, even if these guys are retards

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:28:11 №14389320 [Quote]

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (939.64 KB, 989x742) ImgOps

>>14389316
xis face GEEEG

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:28:17 №14389322 [Quote]

File: 1762695602706r.png 📥︎ (29.31 KB, 1024x1024) ImgOps

>shartycucks are groomers though lmfao

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:28:25 №14389324 [Quote]

>>14389313
tsmt

Thougher 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:28:38 №14389325 [Quote]

>>14389320
geg wtf these niggers are fat though

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:28:51 №14389327 [Quote]

>>14389317
hello shartyfail, don’t you have CP to goon to and racebait to post?

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:29:03 №14389329 [Quote]

>>14389320
IAS
IAS
IAS
IAS
IAS
IAS
IAS
IAS

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:29:36 №14389331 [Quote]

File: SoyBooru.com - 58460 - arm award ear glasses s….png 📥︎ (48.69 KB, 600x600) ImgOps

>>14389324
>>14389313
>>14389327

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:29:40 №14389332 [Quote]

>>14389327
this isnt skywatcher68 this is just a baiter and you are a retarded vantablack nigger if you actually think this is xim

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:30:00 №14389337 [Quote]

>>14384219
so, were 'zas sent?

Brojak 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:30:12 №14389339 [Quote]

File: retard.png 📥︎ (185.42 KB, 640x718) ImgOps

>>>14389324
>>>14389313 (You)
>>>14389327 (You)

Applejak 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:30:38 №14389342 [Quote]

>>14389320
nevermind i didnt read the whole thread he was already oxxed

David 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:32:41 №14389354 [Quote]

>>14389331
stop replying to b8

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:34:26 №14389364 [Quote]

>>14383302
Welcome to wikipedia.
Bias comes through selective enforcement.

Punkjak 12/12/25 (Fri) 09:54:47 №14389448 [Quote]

>>14383546
this is a cis woman

Fisheyejak 12/12/25 (Fri) 10:01:13 №14389477 [Quote]

>>14389196
Sharty didnt even allow avatarfagging or making yourself identifiable between threads when froot was the admin so grooming a specific kid into shooting up his school on the sharty would be pretty hard

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 10:02:05 №14389480 [Quote]

>>14389244
what the sigma do we have a jannie who sniches

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 10:04:07 №14389489 [Quote]

Up

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 10:06:01 №14389494 [Quote]

>>14389480
yes, he is obsessed with us and already derailed previous threads, he is baiting aswell

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 10:06:31 №14389495 [Quote]

>>14389494
nigga he has not posted a single reppey on this site meds

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 10:07:52 №14389498 [Quote]

File: VlodsonMAP.png 📥︎ (151.04 KB, 800x1200) ImgOps

>>>14389494 (You)
>nigga he has not posted a single reppey on this site meds

Spadeson 12/12/25 (Fri) 10:09:18 №14389505 [Quote]

>>14383181
do this now

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 10:12:09 №14389515 [Quote]

Always sucks when newgods find out how biased wikipedia is.
Many people have tried what you try and failed. We all learned at some point how utterly impossible it is to even remove verifiable lies from wikipedia.
<this sentence here is objectively false and your source is unreliable
>oh yes??? do you have a verifiable source disproving it???
<hmm, alright, i will add this one objectively true section with this source
>nooo, you can't do that, because your source is unreliable! Only i can do that!
<maybe just add [citation needed]
>nope, not for you, chud, only we can add sourceless claims with a little footnote

You have to pay an editor, who has a long standing account, to do it for you.
It is how cuckservatives manage to have less bullshit wiki articles, despite also being hated by wiki troons. They pay editors.

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 10:21:00 №14389547 [Quote]

Obsessed wikipedos o algo

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 13:29:48 №14390395 [Quote]

obsessed niggerpedians or something

Fatjak 12/12/25 (Fri) 13:31:44 №14390411 [Quote]

Our 'ki 'apes and 'ills their ((('ki)))

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 14:44:18 №14390926 [Quote]

Up

Chud 12/12/25 (Fri) 16:25:31 №14391869 [Quote]

RISE AND SHINE MUTTHOOURS