Is there any argument why still going non-lethal after betraying UNATCO is more moral than just killing people afterwards? Yeah some people in the NSF are thugs but UNATCO and MJ12 are quite literally zogbots and each of them already killed dozens of innoc

Email
Subject
Comment
File
Embed
Voice
Poll
Password	(For file deletion.)

Chud 12/05/25 (Fri) 12:51:16 №14296329 [Quote]

Is there any argument why still going non-lethal after betraying UNATCO is more moral than just killing people afterwards? Yeah some people in the NSF are thugs but UNATCO and MJ12 are quite literally zogbots and each of them already killed dozens of innocent people before you arrive. By sparing them you're just putting more people in danger.
>but what about that french guy he dindu nuffin, xis paremts will cry if you kill him
Yeah he didn't do nothing because he had just joined for the money and was just standing guard in the street, but he would've done the same as the rest once Walton Simmons declared martial law worldwide.