Do you have a source on that?Source?A source. I need a source.Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you'

Email
Subject
Comment
File
Embed
Voice
Poll
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: soy (25).png 📥︎ (70.13 KB, 400x400) ImgOps

Cobson 11/15/25 (Sat) 20:32:44 №13984761 [Quote]

Do you have a source on that?

Source?

A source. I need a source.

Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.

No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.

You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.

Do you have a degree in that field?

A college degree? In that field?

Then your arguments are invalid.

No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.

Correlation does not equal causation.

CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.

You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.

Nope, still haven't.

I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.

Etan 11/15/25 (Sat) 20:36:12 №13984799 [Quote]

File: 1762924970350a.jpg 📥︎ (111.9 KB, 2048x1024) ImgOps

Chud 11/15/25 (Sat) 20:49:47 №13984933 [Quote]

File: 1758868738540a.png 📥︎ (1.06 MB, 2048x1024) ImgOps

Emmanuel 11/15/25 (Sat) 20:50:11 №13984937 [Quote]

File: 1763239348674f.png 📥︎ (26.41 KB, 767x675) ImgOps

>Do you have a source on that?
>
>Source?
>
>A source. I need a source.
>
>Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
>
>No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
>
>You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
>
>Do you have a degree in that field?
>
>A college degree? In that field?
>
>Then your arguments are invalid.
>
>No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
>
>Correlation does not equal causation.
>
>CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
>
>You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
>
>Nope, still haven't.
>
>I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.

David 11/15/25 (Sat) 20:50:46 №13984948 [Quote]

>>13984799
we say
>yeah someone who says that looks like that
now froogoogaga

Chud 11/15/25 (Sat) 20:51:13 №13984950 [Quote]

>>13984799
>>13984933
kys big nigger lips spammer ywnbtg