/r9k/ - ROBOT9999

>>86223 (OP)
>"how do you feel about the so sudden change of demographics in our countries."
terrible. living in western canada the rapid change only started recently (for example my province was around 88% white in 2001) and since 2020 it has been HELL. niggers are literally roaming the streets and jumping people for their shoes. non-whites get to criticize and denigrate my culture and i can't say anything back or i will be arrested for hate speech
>it crushes me that the new world order loves it so and that no one seems to care.
it does hurt. i've had the conversation with myself and asked if no-one cares why does anything matter. i've concluded that its still not over and that possibly people will wake up and no longer be scared into staying anywhere left of being a 'conservative.'
>how long can we go on like this.
not long. i give the west ten years before everything is over
>its heartbreaking.
it really is.
>i can't be around normies anymore, they are almost soulless.
basically. some normies are okay and tolerable. i notice plenty of them repeating far-right jokes, shitposts and comments. thats kind of what gives me hope for the future
>how do you cope with your homeland disappearing. it seems there is nothing we can do either.
put up stickers and flags or spray paint. my cope is usually that or going to a leftists house and trashing their cars and windows

NEVER BP. its not over yet. it feels terrible but if we continue to promote our right-wing thought we have a chance of waking up the normies, things will only get worse as time goes on- but just remember how hitler came into power. i don't believe we will have to get into financial weimar before we get a new hitler. but one day its going to come. when the non's have a majority thats the only time i can say its over

>>86224
as for spiritual decline- it is making a comeback with the rise of the alt-right

IM a shitskin living in europe

>>86224
thanks for sharing, glad someone cares atleast

>>86224
Hitler killed a gorillion white people because he shorted a neuron witnessing the trenches and his romantic obsession (his niece) killing herself and he thought that the solution to the worlds problems was obviously even more war of course. He then joined some chud party that succeeded entirely because none of the moderates were able to do anything right; the prior leadership was so awful. Their country was getting raped and they were incapable of achieving anything short of kicking the hornets nest and getting anally sounded even worse. So naturally normies and silent generation scarred nophonos all voted for him.
Hitler then triggered an economic miracle entirely through going luxorious monumental debt to make the military economy about four or five times bigger than the real economy and he trusted that he would be able to repay everything with money that wasn't his and the blood of thousands of white people.

'Build your economy around debt, invest almost all of your government money into the military, insist that your soldiers bleed for the glory of the fatherland and your protection by being shipped into stalingrad for oil.'

Is this not why I hate my own countries actions in geopolitics? I hate my country in the civil nature because now they want me to submit to 24/7 monitoring for my safety, how the hell would I like hitler more than any other closeted chaser politician. Jimmy Carter was good, Bill was good besides opening us up to China, ngl I can'think of a single good republican president in the last fifty years lmao besides 17' Trump. The wrong leaders are getting elected at every opportunity and everyones just jerrymandered and corraled into two easily controllable political parties that havent been able to elect a normal president since fucking 2014 that has no strings to manipulate like brandon or connections to tech corporations that replace good traditional jobs with heavily optimized inhuman algorithms that they can dilute wages of high skill jobs with.

Totaler Krieg just means your quality of life gets worse and you have no opposing minority power to side with against the big power to form a coalition. Immigration has been so fucking bad this millenium, it has been so mismanaged by the eurocucks; Trump, Biden especially Jesus christ. Obama did a better job at removing illegal americans than Trump and he didnt need a fucking PMC sized budget to achieve that. Obama did nothing good for blacks either lmao thats a plus and a negative that nigga would dronestrike fucking king midas or the zulus if they werent cooperating with central banks lol

Niggas can only go into so much depravity before they realize that they need to rebuild their community, thats why trump got such a high black vote. He ruined so much positive movement with niggers entirely by baiting and switching the ones that are smart enough to pay attention, Theres definitely gonna be a bunch of votes lost to newsom The inward flow of mud and shit needs to slow down for our communities to get better, I really think most people agree with the concept of immigration control but Merkel handled it with the subtlety of a sledgehammer and singlehandledly fucking skyrocketed the molestation rates in europe, Biden played it like a toddler playing HOI. Its these fucking first generation fresh off the boat shitskins man, if like a tenth of them were coming in, their addition to population growth would halt after the second or third generation after they become americanized and shit out less than two kids a family

>>86233
>Hitler then triggered an economic miracle entirely through going luxorious monumental debt
germany was in so much debt because of the treaty of Versailles (which had an extreme amount of interest) the way hitler instantly fixed their economy was: stop all repayments and limit their interest repayments to as little as possible. germany wasn't in any more debt than it already was. the rearmament didn't affect the economy because hitler started using MEFO bills instead of marks
>he trusted that he would be able to repay everything with money that wasn't his and the blood of thousands of white people.
if you want to know how hitler treated his people just look into what the strength through joy program did. (the volkswagon, the vacations, swimming pools in work locations, free tickets to movies/events)
>Obama did a better job at removing illegal americans than Trump and he didnt need a fucking PMC sized budget to achieve that.
i believe trump did his ICE charade just to make it look like he was doing something (most of the detainee's get to go to court and get some libtard judge to grant them citizenship)
>Its these fucking first generation fresh off the boat shitskins man
everyone from a 'canadian native' to a random no english jeet shitskin holds resentment towards white people. it doesn't matter who they are, they feel undermined anyway
>if like a tenth of them were coming in, their addition to population growth would halt after the second or third generation after they become Americanized and shit out less than two kids a family
the naturalization lie is retarded. these people still hang with their kind. mexicans in the states still stay with other spics no-matter what. you never see mexicans embed into white suburbia- they can't. there are reasons cities have little chinas and baghdad's. humans naturally segregate. even if you limited immigration these communities will still be there- and they will continue to grow and they will pretend to have blood attached to american soil while being hindu or muzzie or what-ever shitskin religion they believe in. Americanization is a lie. whites don't integrate with hindu's in india. they never will. neither will shitskins in the US. even the 'natives' who have had hundreds of years to become Americanized are still the same way they always were.

People need to stop associating disliking mass immigration as some sort of right-wing extremist belief, thats mainly the reason as to why most normies are so apathetic towards it. Mass immigration is terrible for everyone living in the country, even Socialists should be protesting against it because it allows foreign workers to be paid less and treated worse since if they ever protest against it they can just be shipped back to where they came from, not to mention the unfair competition between the foreigners and the natives of the country. This isnt happening because as I said before Left-wing politicians tend to oppose anything the right has to say even if the topic concerns both parties. The revulsion of the replacement of the native populace is a core centrist belief that should be advocated by all members of the nation in a united front, rather then as some sort of alt-right fringe movement.
The death of religion in the West has arrived due to the arrival of a plethora of distractions, such as the computer your viewing this from, to distract our educated minds from the uncomfortable reality that our lives our lost, and we are walking this earth with nothing to live for. That is why the average atheist is so utterly soulless.

>>86248
major trvth nvke btw, for an example the main driving force behind the white Australia policy was the labor party and the trade unions, the communist party was also for immigration controls doe it didn't want it to be a racial thing. We also had labor PM (john curtin) who said that Australia is "forever the home of the descendants of those people who came here in peace in order to establish in the South Seas an outpost of the British race". Unironically the right has probably done the most damage to the image of the anti-immigration movement as whenever you say you want immigration controls and that generational Aussies are being undercut by new arrivals normies assume you're a frothing at the mouth racist.
<
I think the main driving force behind the nu anti-immigration movement should be unions as in my experience (idk how it is in other countries but I assume its similar to Aussieland) the majority of skilled tradesmen are white heritage Australians and if they were motivated they could bring the country to a halt by striking for immigration controls/deportations under the excuse of immigrants being a tool of the bosses to suppress wages and working conditions (which is true as immigrants are way less likely to unionize than native borns). Also switzerlands currently having a "no to a switzerland of 10 million referendum" which I think can be copied amongst many countries ("No to a Canada of 40 million"/No to a Australia of 30 million)

>>86248
that's true
>unorignal

I am not a fan of large-scale immigration. Funnily enough, I am an immigrant myself, half roach, half western european, in the UK, but 2nd gen. (when I say roach, my family was balkan turk, so actually white). Both my parents work, pay taxes, etc, and are white and don't try to bring stupid rituals into the country, doebeit they weren't doing any before. It really matters what kind of immigrants are allowed to come in legally. If you let every jeet turn up and bring their whole shitskin family in too, you end up with modern day London, having entire boroughs that are majority jeet, pajeet, sandnigger, etc. These people are the types to walk around in a full nike tech fleece no matter the weather, vape on the bus, rape, steal, do drugs, etc. They are a net drain on society.

In the UK you can see a pretty clear divide between the older georgian/victorian parts of cities, which are clean and have nice architecture, and the newer slum parts with "temporary" buildings from the 50s, terrible concrete blocks, and are a great place to go if you want to get mugged. In my opinion the country died in 1945. This wasn't due to politics, I hate the niggers who obsess over "muh fuggin communism" destroying the country, the thing that destroyed the west was profit chasing and severe debt. After WW1 the British empire started to stagnate and weaken, but not greatly enough to collapse, but after ww2 drained any last bit of money from the treasury because the (((americans))) were profiting off selling shitty equipment for a premium, the empire could not sustain to hold onto its colonies, and the people were sick of fighting and wouldn't have gone to fight over control of jeets. France tried to hold onto its colonies, but it had been greatly weakened by the war and was facing pressure by the soviets AND the supposedly "allied" americans to leave africa.

Hitler was the most SLF nigger who brought down the west faster and more effectively than any jew could have ever done. By destroying the old order and their control over the third world, he handed the americans the power to bring their shitty free markets and liberal ideology to everyone. Old socialism wasn't a bad system, and neither was old conservatism. The communists were a threat, but were contained to the soviet union with little influence elsewhere. The SLF shut it all down for this balance, allowing the communists to exert their influence over the turd world and eastern europe, and the biggest enemy, american liberalism, to turn the entire western world into liberal shitholes where you MUST accept the niggers and you MUST love the faggots. If hitler had behaved and had either stopped after the munich conference, where he had already greatly expanded germany and her influence, or if he had offered a peace with honor to the allies where he retains control over poland and the east, but lets the french and benelux stay with their old borders, germany would have been a great power on par with the USA today and would have easily countered soviet influence.
If Hitler could have kept his jewish greed within himself, china would have never fallen to communism, and Africa and the Middle east would have probably eventually been given autonomy or even self rule, but much later and with a transition that allowed the west to still more or less control them. Regions such as French Algeria and Tunisia, Italian Libya, and British South Africa / Rhodesia would have definitely stayed with their respective rulers, as there were plenty of white people there and they could enforce their rule strongly enough. The turd worlders could have even been educated enough to not be the way they are today. (Doebeit India would have been abandoned sooner or later, nothing can fix that entire subcontinent of shitskins and it would have cost a fortune to even try)

I am not religious. There might be a god, but I see no use in aligning myself with one of the jewish religions. If I did, I'd probably be a christian, as Jesus himself was a good example, but Paul was a nigger who actually turned his lessons into a religion and we can't tell how much he fucked around with it.

>>86266
>didn't fit into one post

I don't care about the countries anymore. Its probably too late to save them, there are so many jeets everywhere and all political parties are liberal, don't fall for the niggers like Farage, Brexit increased net immigration, and reduced that from Europe to take in more jeets and niggers instead. All they care about is money. America vvon, and we are all suffering the consequences. I want to move to a quiet place on the mediterranean coast and live my life in peace, and ignore what the media and greater soyciety does and says.

Immigration is a problem socially, but the economic aspect is ignored. The lack of any true socialist/communist parties in the west with a voter base is a tragedy. Anybody who isn't a faggot worshipping liberal on the left can see that more people in the country drives down wages, and allows companies to abuse its workers more as they are replacable. The right should hate immigration as it erodes the traditional values of the country, but instead it pretends to hate it and then increases immigration as they are all bought out by (((billionaires))). What happened to the old right like that of Teddy Roosevelt that limited corporations. What happened to the old left, the socialists that fought for workers rights and the 8 hour work day. Now all we have is liberals that will let the country get raped by anybody who pays enough.

>>86267
>>86266
An informed and reasonable opinion, on MY shitflinging clittycel website, its more likely than you think!
<
I think most people on here bar the insane clittycel /pol/tards realise that limited immigration is necessary and often beneficial in a globalised world but politicians bring in so many to the point that the native born population is at risk of being made a plurality within 2-3 (or potentially less) decades

>>86278
I might be biased because I am one myself, but I don't see any issue with immigration WITHIN Europe. Some people like hating on slavs / eastern europeans but honestly they aren't any different than western europeans, just poorer on average, especially in the UK i see british people being absolute slobs as much as I see russians doing so.
Their religions are basically the same, their culture has minor differences but is similar, they're white and civilised people.

Heres something that might get people leaking, but I don't think turks are bad people (again, I am a roach, but hear me out). Some turks are going to be ignorant muslims that want to spend eternity living in their medieval village in the mountains. But some turks, especially those in the western parts of the country, like Izmir, Istanbul, etc, are basically european in thought, and aren't turd-worlders that shit in the streets. A lot of the turkish immigration that happened earlier on was from these groups of turks, and if you look at them in germany, these people all work and contribute and don't make a mess of things. I've heard some germans refer to them as the "one good immigrant" as these turks do actually want to work. This isn't me advocating for opening the floodgates for turkish immigrants. Because of the retard dictator Erdogan being a corrupt SLF, hes filling the country with syrians for euros and votes, so opening immigration would be allowing these syrians rapefugees into europe and they are going to be expecting free money from the state. I just want people to understand that turkey isn't a shithole, and turks aren't on par with jeets or sandniggers, theres a lot of people in turkey that are not that different from your average balkan european.

My view on immigration is that it is fine if it is actually doctors and engineers, not the "doctors and engineers" that are currently being brought in. There is no loss in bringing in educated people who want to work in your country, but they must selected carefully to only be in careers where there aren't enough people in the country already, so they don't make the wages for careers in STEM crash down, and their credentials have to be snopes fact checked to not be from the Mumbai Brap Academy of Scams. I was looking at the australian criteria for immigration, and it seems they kinda have this, where to apply for a work visa you have to work in a specific sector, like mining engineering. Now add a race filter to pick those which will actually assimilate, and not create Nu-Delhi slums in your cities, and don't take in a gorillion, and it should be fine. For a european country, I don't see anything wrong with accepting Europeans, Canadians and Americans with little to no restriction, filtering people coming from Turkey and the Caucasus by making sure they will work in a career that the country actually needs more people working in, and then much harsher restricitons for the rest of the world. I am adding the chinese, japanese and koreans into this because alTHOUGH they are generally hard-working, they also tend to clump up and not truly assimilate, doebeit their chinatowns are still better than Arab/jeet slums.

>>86266
>Hitler was the most SLF nigger who brought down the west faster and more effectively than any jew could have ever done.

hitler laid the foundation for modern european identitarianism and racialism you little nigger. germany would still be a third world weimar country if he hadn't came to power. he led the charge against communism- which was already planning to take poland and finland
>By destroying the old order and their control over the third world
hitler did not do this. for example british india and eastern french colonies were already starting to rebel against the europeans since the 1920's
>The communists were a threat, but were contained to the soviet union with little influence elsewhere
^as i said they were planning to take finland and poland- and move into europe
>If hitler had behaved and had either stopped after the munich conference, where he had already greatly expanded germany and her influence, or if he had offered a peace with honor to the allies where he retains control over poland and the east, but lets the french and benelux stay with their old borders, germany would have been a great power on par with the USA today and would have easily countered soviet influence.
nigger. poland was ethnic cleansing germans which caused germany to invade (the soviets then moved their plans of invading poland up) the english and french had no real reason to defend poland and if they did why didn't they also fight the USSR? hitler threatened the banking system of europe (which is so profitable all of the richest men in the world are (((bankers))) it was coming either way.
>If Hitler could have kept his jewish greed within himself, china would have never fallen to communism
how does this make sense? japan invaded korea and then china long before hitler even thought about speaking to japan (1931) china was already weak and at war
>Africa and the Middle east would have probably eventually been given autonomy or even self rule, but much later and with a transition that allowed the west to still more or less control them.
wrong. islamists were already trying to remove western control before hitler- also the west pulled out of africa because of the libtards of the time complained about human rights (which was being complained about even before the book "the heart of darkness" was written)
>Regions such as French Algeria and Tunisia, Italian Libya, and British South Africa / Rhodesia would have definitely stayed with their respective rulers
hitler had nothing to do with south africa/rhodesias fall. that was because of the communists training guerillas to over throw both governments

>>86290
Are you stupid? Hitler didn't directly do this shit, but there wasn't even the slightest chance for the colonies to overthrow european control until hitler weakened the west. Hitler might have founded european identitarianism, but he didn't found racialism you retard, people were measuring skulls before he even existed. Germany might have been a weimar shithole, but the rest of europe was fine.
>British india and eastern french colonies were already starting to rebel
Did any of these rebellions have any impact? Ho Chi Minh only gained some power in indochina once the japanese took control, and India was getting beat up repeatedly. Britain and France had the military and the money to fund going off and beating them into submission. After Hitler fucked everything up, Britain had to leave the Raj asap as they could not deal with it, and France tried to fight the communists but weren't able to, and then even the USA wasn't able to beat them as they had support from the USSR and were popular with the locals
The USSR wouldn't have had the balls to do much in eastern europe without the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact. Finland maybe, but if it wasn't for the invasion of Norway the Allies were already planning to support Finland, and if Germany hadn't been at war either they could have supported Finland. They didn't end up taking more than Karelia anyway. Poland, Romania and the Baltic States were the other targets of the soviet union, but these would have all gotten western support anyway. If Germany truly wanted to fight off communism, signing away half of eastern europe wasn't the way to do it.
>China was already weak and at war
Either the japanese would eventually have won in china, in which case who the fuck cares, asians killing each other, doesn't matter, and if they tried their suicidal attack on the west ev&doe there was no distraction from Germany they would have gotten curb stomped by the USA, France and Britain. Once that happened, Chiang Kai Shek would have been given manchuria, and if Mao still was willing to try for a civil war he would have gotten crushed, Chiang would have had the support of the west and doe Mao may be supported by the USSR, he would lack the manchurian territories that Stalin transferred to him, and the chinese would be less supportive as Chiang had still managed to win the war against Japan.

The islamists were already trying to remove western control, but fuck all happened. If the liberals in america hadn't gotten the control over western democracies through (((loans))), and Britain wasn't completely exhausted after fighting the germans, italians and japanese for 6 years, they would have tried to hold on to a lot more of their colonies. South Africa and Rhodesia did not fall because communists were training guerillas. They fell because the rest of the world was too obsessed in their liberalism to support them. If Britain had supported Rhodesia and South africa, they wouldn't have fallen. Egypt would not have gotten the Suez, as Britain would have never been weak enough to lose it to them.

btw France and Britain didn't defend poland because they cared so much about the poles, they did it because it was their last chance to still fight the germans on 2 fronts, and they knew clitler was coming for them next. They didn't realise that poland would crumble immediately, and hoped that it would serve as a better distraction.

Mussolini was a better fascist than Hitler was until the war. He was popular, he built up the country's economy in a stable manner, he killed african niggers to expand his colonial power and annexed albania without any fuss. He did all this without being seen as a heckin' evil dictator because he could contain his leakage and didn't write an autistic book about his plans for world domination and didn't come off as a fuggin hateful bigot.

What I was trying to get at is that Hitler wasn't directly responsible for everything that happened, but most of it wouldn't have happened if it wasn't for WW2 and the consequences of it.

>>86266
>in the UK
why are you using american spelling then. nice try mossad

>>86283
no, just train the native population lol.
there is racial and definitely cultural differences in europe, especially cultural differences. maybe because your family 'assimilated', but you can never truly. i have german friends, (also in the uk) and even though they were born in white parts of england have english accents etc, they still have german traits. you probably don't notice it, but we do. any english person can immediately tell, even if you are 'native'

>>86305
I genuinely am in the UK, I don't pay attention to the spelling much doebeit. Like I will always use colour and armour instead of color/armor, but I will use the british and american spelling interchangeably for s/z and c/s. A lot of what I read is online so without paying attention to it I must have picked up american spelling.

>>86306
Its true that you can never completely assimilate and become the same as a local. What I'm saying is that in small quantities, as european immigrants tend to be, it isn't a big deal, and that those traits won't be something thats bad. They will probably be small things like not putting shoes on when entering the house (a good thing that everybody should do anyway), not drinking tea with milk, etc. Its not like the cultural enrichment we get from jeets and sandniggers like rape, murder, throwing rubbish in the street, driving like a pig, that sort of shit.
I do notice that I do not act like a brit. I'm not saying that I am "assimilated" to the point of being equal to an english person, of course that isn't possible.
I agree with the point on training the natives. It would have been better if we could have had more governments in africa and elsewhere like those of south africa / rhodesia, and for longer, so that the natives would have maybe learnt how to be civilised.

>>86312
in that case, i agree. england has always had immigrants, like dutch and german quarters of london, but we arent a 'nation of immigrants' like the retarded idea that the jeets coming into america are even slightly similar to the american oldstock

>>86296
>Are you stupid? Hitler didn't directly do this shit, but there wasn't even the slightest chance for the colonies to overthrow european control until hitler weakened the west.
european control on africa was loosened before WW2 you little nigger. europe had already made treaties with the african natives by 1930. the communists after WW2 (the communists had embedded networks going all the way to mexico by 1920)
my point is you nigger that the eastern colonies were because of japan destroying china letting the communists take over after they got crushed by america which started BEFORE hitler came to power, and the communists would wipe up africa by arming and training the natives LONG, AFTER, WW2.
>After Hitler fucked everything up, Britain had to leave the Raj asap
ghandi already had support by 1930, the indian police and military were starting to mass defect from britain
>The USSR wouldn't have had the balls to do much in eastern europe without the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact
the molotov-ribbentrop pact was null since poland was invaded. remember the communists already had networks set up in africa ready to start revolutions- some still in mexico too and more in south america. they definitely wanted to move into europe and would have still invaded romania once they became fascist
>Chiang Kai Shek would have been given manchuria, and if Mao still was willing to try for a civil war he would have gotten crushed
if the USSR wasn't busy destroying europe they would have just came and wrecked china
>South Africa and Rhodesia did not fall because communists were training guerillas.
yes it did. england pulled out of south africa in 1931, and handed them their own government with some british control. this was because communists had already started fighting the british since 1921 (which had direct lines to moscow)

rhodesia's situation was different because there was unrest and the communists were riling up blacks to get their right to vote- which led england to force rhodesia to give the blacks more rights and de-segregate. ian smith refused and just declared independence. (fighting began with the communists a year prior to the UDIndependence) the USSR would train the ZAPU/ZANU and every other nigger insurgent and they eventually took over the government.

so yes it was literally because of the communists
>Mussolini was a better fascist than Hitler was until the war. He was popular, he built up the country's economy in a stable manner, he killed african niggers to expand his colonial power and annexed albania without any fuss. He did all this without being seen as a heckin' evil dictator because he could contain his leakage and didn't write an autistic book about his plans for world domination and didn't come off as a fuggin hateful bigot.
^seething that they aren't apart of the germanic ubermensch award
hitler built a much larger economy than mussolini did. also hitler had no plan for world domination
>bu-but this one guy said this after the war from 1939!
i doubt it. if:
>"Germany will either be a world power or there will be no Germany."
was all he could muster for world domination talks thats very vague.
>What I was trying to get at is that Hitler wasn't directly responsible for everything that happened, but most of it wouldn't have happened if it wasn't for WW2 and the consequences of it.
<japan had already fucked china and allowed the communists to get power before hitler was in power
<finland was being supported by hitler- the allies would have sent aid just to blockade trade between finland and germany. and if not for the large war economy germany wouldn't have had supplies to send to italy in africa, finland, or fascist's in ukraine/russia/romania
<SA and rhodesia already had communist insurgents fighting long before hitler gained power
<indian military and police had started defecting onto ghandis side before hitler came to power

>>86335
I'm not even going to keep arguing with you nigga, you can believe that the communists were taking over everything and Saint Hitler turned up to save the day but failed in his honourable crusade. I don't buy that the communists would have been able to completely kick the europeans out of the turd world without them first having been greatly weakened with war in europe. At least with the commies it would have been white men killing niggers funded by communists in an african shithole, and not about 40 million europeans dead, with their countries bulldozed in a war that let the jews of america shit all over the world with liberalism. No shit he built a larger economy than mussolini, it wasn't stable and he was in fucking germany not italy.

>>86322
Yeah I very much hate the idea of a nation being "built by immigrants" and shit. The jeets in particular have a raped mindset of the entire empire having been built from their labour and their exploitation. What I don't understand is how they haven't come to the simple thought that if they were so great, and the british were so weak without them, how did the British conquer their entire shit-filled continent with the greatest opposition against them having come not from jeets, but the french who were also trying to colonise them. Jamaica was literally more important than india when it came to initially building up the british empire, or however the bombo is clat.
When it comes to immigration, I mean it should be in a limited amount for economic sectors which actually need workers, which would lead to at most a few more quarters of london being like those dutch and german quarters, and also there were some french quarters from protestants escaping persecution.

>>86345
i saw some chud video saying its because jeets have always been governed by minorities (aryans moghols british etc) so they have an inferiority complex. idk for sure tho.

its californicaaation

>>86335
didn't read, but imo. we should forget hitler and just be white powerists, we never needed him b4

>>86351
geg i'm pretty sure everyone saw that vid, the thumbnail with "indian fatigue" was too good
Even fucking Rehab Room spoke about jugaad lol
Also if you want some gegs, go into the comment section and look at all the jeets leaking
> NOOOOO SAAAR IT IS NOT TRUE, WE DO NOT SHIT IN STREET SAAAR, JUGAAD AND IZZAT IS NOT REAL YOU MADE IT UP, INDIA BEST COUNTRY, SANDMAN BEAT YOU
after seeing all of them jabbering about this sandman guy, i found him, and its a jeet which made some long winded SNCA video that was like 15 minutes long and which had him go out of his way to research and find statistics. The 5 minute bait video won, jeets fell for bait as they always do, and gave him a gorillion views and comments which will bump his channel up to heaven.

If I ever start a youtube channel I think I will make a couple videos baiting jeets to begin with to rape the (algo)rithm, then go on to make whatever I wanted to and delete those jeet bait videos and rename the channel. That way they have no proof it ever existed to try and shut me down, and I get algorithm bumps.

Is it a hot take to say I honestly don't care about immigration that much? Sure it's bad, that's undeniable, but I just view it as another one of the evil things the elites are doing. You could kick out every immigrant and it still wouldn't solve the modern problems with the west. I just think it's stupid to blame one racial group for everything wrong with your country, it's low iq goyim behavior

>>86367
Its stupid to hate immigrants, after all if you lived in niggerhell you probably would leave it if a western country gave you the chance. Its fine to dislike immigration but there isn't a point in bullying the niggers and jeets that made it over, you can't really get rid of them. Like you say the elites are the cause, theres no point curing symptoms of an illness, it has to be pulled out by the root.

>>86367
it would solve people being able to buy houses- which would allow more younger people to settle down- which would make it easier to have kids.

it would fix plenty. immigration is one of the root problems of the west
>>86388
>you can't really get rid of them. just let these white hating faggots denigrate and piss all over everything you love bro!
we can. most immigrants are illegal- who jump their studies or temp visa's and stay. from the US to canada or the UK. you can legally deport them, and if you had a REAL right-wing government it could happen and be so simple.
>Like you say the elites are the cause, theres no point curing symptoms of an illness, it has to be pulled out by the root.
winning on immigration is a good start. from there you can start asking WHO brought all of them here. you would end up being able to say it was HIAS- they would be fucked

Sometimes i wish i was a normgroid who didnt know what was happening, i was talking to a guy at my jewb and he said he thought the world was 50% white and he was shocked when i said it was 7% and that it was 30% during the war. The majority of people who say they support it have no idea what demographic shift entails and think that race is just skin deep and that ytpipo are more advanced cuz dey got rivers an shiet

>>86392
what good is it to be an ostrich with your head in the sand?

>>86412
you are hopepilled and have no reason to be depressed, copes are also infinitely more effective if you think everything is fine and find watching sportsball at the pub every weekend with your drunkard friends fulfilling

>>86417
it is less depressing sure. but you'd just end up like one of the people who ISN'T afraid of the tweaking nigger on the subway and you'll get stabbed and die

>>86391
Jewish Derangement Syndrome, also blaming all of the problems in the West on immigration and DA JOOOOOZ, just makes your argument against them more convoluted and more unappealing to the average person.

>>86463
doesn't matter. ill get around to explaining orgs like HIAS to them

>>86463
geg always one guy in a thread like this.

>>86463
>just makes your argument against them more convoluted
The negative effects of immigrants are very direct.