>>82203nation-destroying TRVTHNVKE right here, all rhetoric besides syllogisms is really just bullshit wisecracking aurafarming faggotry.
side note: this is also why i really hated english class in hs: to get a good mark a student would make an observation and instead of explaining it as laconically as possible he'd present it in the form of a nuanced discussion so that the teacher would stroke his beard like a chinese philospher and say 'ah yes, very nuanced CANT YOU SEE IM NOOOOOANCING!!!'. for instance i would probably say something like 'water is cohesive because it it a polar molecule because it has a bent geometry because because of the lone pair on the oxygen atom because vsepr theory predicts it'. whereas an A+ student would make it really gay and say shit like 'It has often been observed that water has cohesive properties, but this characteristic does not exist in a vacuum. Nor does cohesion exist in of itself. To explain this ideosyncrasy, I shall contextualize water's macroscopic chemistry by elaborating upon the intermolecular forces blah blah blah i jerked off while writing this because of how smart i am blah blah blah oh shit i need to come up with a sway to segue this into how blax trans poc were oppressed in the 1860's wait hold on (pulls idea out of ass) this should do it…" and so on