/qa/ - Question & Answer

This is a real conversation between the people presented here that happens roughly 9 months from now.
Quote: "Is it not moral to let the site develop by itself with minimal intervention?"
Limeade: "Of course, what right man would have it any other way?"
Soot: "Of course, yet that'd only lead to it's own destruction, whether that be by the dissolution culture or by brimstone spam."
Quote: "It makes no difference what people think of posts, in the same way you wouldn't ask a man what he thinks about the sun or the moon. Quality is entirely subjective, and that's the way it'll always be, this way and no over way."
The next 3 minutes are inaudible.
Quote: "Soot, you know it's within your element what has happened, afterall the [jerdee] was made by your supporters."
Soot: "Of course but that's different to direct involvement, as you had with the zarty."
Quote: "By how much? Truth is, it's the exact same situation, we're similar in that matter."
Limeade: "That's your notion?"
Quote: "Without brimstone, there would be no gems."
Limeade: "That's obvious."
Quote: "Of course but in the same way, without enemies, there'd be no allies, it works in the same way war does."
Nothing notable happens for the next 20 minutes, only that Kuz joins.
Soot: "So, since all of us with the exception of limeade, have actually been involved with websites considered coal to the sharty, why should it matter when the sharty falls?"
Kuz: "Well of course it doesn't, disregarding fact that it's sort of contribution between all of us, and therefore culimation of all wills into large will."
Quote: "You're crazy Kuz."
Kuz: "Although that's what we have seen, isn't it? With Doll taking after me, then Froot after Doll, then you after Froot."
Quote: "Of course but even then we've contradicted eachother, and showed error in our views, so it was still of independent will."
Soot: "Regardless of if that's true, it doesn't belittle the consistent opinions of the site itself, as the admins do not make a higher court."
Quote: "What are you saying?"
Soot: "What makes up if something is good and bad isn't dictated by some sort of grand suzerain, rather it's a public global committee that beggar all questions of right, both spiritually and naturally."
Quote: "But why bring up spirituality? For the fact of what the sharty thinks is subjective, people on /qa/ post things people on /soy/ hate and vise versa."
Kuz: "I second this."
Soot: "Yet many things stay the same, things of a spiritual good, therefore defining and confirming it's power over the public opinion."
The file beyond this point got corrupted, so we do not know what happens beyond this point in the conversation.