>>880145>You saw this reply, you thought about it, you decided to respond to it, you decided which words to write, you decided which image to use, you decided to post.You gave me a list of things that the brain did, not the consciousness. Prove that the consciousness was responsible for any of these actions, because I can prove otherwise: refer to the Libet experiments.
>If the brain has nothing to steer it you'd be fine with no entertainment.This is a fallacious argument. You are assuming that the brain needs to be steered and that the lack of steering leads it to be fine with no entertainment. Why?
>Why would it need to seek out stimuli specifically? There is no reason for it to see enjoyment beyond subsidenceThe perception of happiness is an evolutionary adaptation that leads humans to be more social, increasing the odds of successful procreation and propagation of the species.