>>210431the enlightened pedophile is allowed to redact links to now defunct sites to help his fellow pedophiles from foi requests or reports should the site still be up
because he is better than you, he deserves to know but for everybody else it has to be redacted - its pathetic
I just read all the top articles, articles such as kuz, chud or slopjak are absolutley abysmal reads
I find it interesting everyone itt just said no u without a proper rebuttal, probably because they werent around to see what the wiki was actually like when it was updated and maintained by people who werent discord immigrants