№125180[Quote]
Ask your friends if someone goons to a fully male looking character but the author says he's a female, are you gaybthen(yes).
<
Liking to adult looking characters who are actualy underage isnt pedophilia, you'll see 16yo girls look fully developed lookswise, now obviously you wont do anything with them for moral reason but you'll probably find them atractive
<
Total Lolinigger Death btw
№125181[Quote]
>>125173 (OP)stop liking fictional characters in that way
№125208[Quote]
If you aren't getting off to the fact that said character is underage, then no, obviously not. The former is an attraction to depictions prepubescent features, while the latter is specifically an attraction depictions of adults.
also
>underage(like 17 or 18)
>18
№125211[Quote]
noone cares, if the character looks mature (isnt a loli), then you shouldn't even think about this at all