There's a debate going among my friends: If liking an anime character who is canonically 3 thrembillion years old but is stylized to look underage is (rightfully) considered pedophilia, is liking a character who is stylized to look like an adult(like lat

Email
Subject
Comment
Verification	Please type the name of the object/variant:
File
Embed
Voice
Poll
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: 1768873944118297.png 📥︎ (82.19 KB, 486x358) ImgOps

Chud 02/15/26 (Sun) 01:35:19 №125173 [Quote]

There's a debate going among my friends:
If liking an anime character who is canonically 3 thrembillion years old but is stylized to look underage is (rightfully) considered pedophilia, is liking a character who is stylized to look like an adult(like late 20s or older), but is canonically underage(like 17 or 18) also pedophilia?

Chud 02/15/26 (Sun) 07:03:35 №125180 [Quote]

Ask your friends if someone goons to a fully male looking character but the author says he's a female, are you gaybthen(yes).
<
Liking to adult looking characters who are actualy underage isnt pedophilia, you'll see 16yo girls look fully developed lookswise, now obviously you wont do anything with them for moral reason but you'll probably find them atractive
<
Total Lolinigger Death btw

Chud 02/15/26 (Sun) 07:05:52 №125181 [Quote]

>>125173 (OP)
stop liking fictional characters in that way

Chud 02/15/26 (Sun) 14:58:20 №125208 [Quote]

If you aren't getting off to the fact that said character is underage, then no, obviously not. The former is an attraction to depictions prepubescent features, while the latter is specifically an attraction depictions of adults.
also
>underage(like 17 or 18)
>18

Chud 02/15/26 (Sun) 15:11:47 №125211 [Quote]

noone cares, if the character looks mature (isnt a loli), then you shouldn't even think about this at all

Chud 02/15/26 (Sun) 19:36:17 №125223 [Quote]

File: doctooooosguide.png 📥︎ (176.15 KB, 1000x1000) ImgOps

>>125173 (OP)
No, I solved the pedophilia debate, consult the infographic