/x/ - Paranormal/Schizo

I want to disappear into the woods

Obsessesed fish and game won't let you live off the fatta the land and if you don't speak like them they'll send you to the looney bin and mind rape you

You are gonna get mind raped by these demons cuz you are not aligned with God

you likely are not rich enough to do any sort of goetia, you need very specific materials and to hit very specific timings to not get gigaraped by whatever demon you want to force to make your twp grow into bbc. also, you should read the testament of solomon before pursuing this; you would do well to remember at the end of the book he got BTFO'd by the same demons he enslaved to build his temple

I think the same, mayne

>>21819 (OP)
>thinking about reading The Key of Solomon and doing magic
don't waste your time on 17th century goyslop kike fandom board game, those aren't even real witchcraft, just get baptized or confirm in a catholic or orthodox church and eat the body and blood of christ every sunday

Just immerse yourself in the esoteric and mystical parts of Catholicism, and if you feel like it Alchemy too. Truth and comfort resides in God and in Him only.

That's fagot stuff

That's literally a form of mental retardation magic

>>21878
Finaly Someone like me.ever Heard of brother ADA???

>>21829
same demons that follow or work for (((yahweh))). (((satan))) = (((yhwh))).

>>21862
Wasn't the christian kabbalah even a thing once?

>>21887
they against catholic church so those are nophono

>>21886
>(((yahweh))). (((satan))) = (((yhwh))).
false, (((satan))) was the angel lucifer, who originally assigned to the task of protecting the future mother of God since the very beginning of all creation. the mother of God who had not existed yet and meant to incarnate the son of God as human in the future, and the envy and resentment of lucifer to the future mother of God caused him to go against is the first woman eve, not adam the first man.

basically God, the eternal father who forever being the father, never once was not being the father, has always been having his eternal son, and by both of their eternal love between them makes both of them never against each other, the Holy Spirit as their love has always been the third person out of the father and the son. since those three persons are in forever harmony and has always been existed without beginning, so they are one as one God, share the exact same will and essence, so we call all them as trinity. as the heavenly father is one God, who he has and must always be with his son and his Spirit, so the entire trinity bears the name of the father (Lord = yahweh = YHWH), as the son and Holy Spirit are both YHWH, so we normally refer the whole trinity as he/him, as we worship the one essence of the one and only God the father, so as him being as the trinity.

so go back to (((satan))), he was just one of the creation of God, who has a beginning like all other angels and people, the only thing special about him is that he was the first seraph to claim to be equal as the trinity, and 1/3 of all angels followed his belief. so those angels no longer able to see the face of YHWH, they no longer have direct access to wisdom of God like all the angels and future human saints. so even the lower archangel michael could send all of them out of heaven. now they just demons as (((satan))) no longer is same lucifer as before, now could only be a leader of kikes, so now the mother of God virgin mary as the queen of heaven could even send them directly to hell

>>21893
There was once a Kabbalah aproved by the local church

https://churchlifejournal.nd.edu/articles/officially-sanctioned-catholic-kabbalah/

>>21897
>aproved by the local church
i read that article months ago, and writer (((Andrew Kuiper))) wasn't even a catholic, but a orthodox goyim. and by the content itself there was no way he was representing any local catholics but he own opinion
https://publicorthodoxy.org/author/andrew-kuiper/

despite of him used to (((larp))) as catholic, i would not ad hominem. i still see he was being subtle on reaffirming the fact kabbalah as a heretical idea like the entire rabbinic judaism, still originated from catholicism like all heretics do. basically like liberal catholics will call some (((protestant))) a crypto-catholic as a strategic evangelism, yet all (((protestants))) are still outside of the church if their faith still against the pope and (((remove 7 books from bible)))
>Many Kabbalists also held the literal and mystical meanings of the Torah in a fourfold schema. This is officially taught in the Zohar, but even Jewish scholars such as Wilhelm Bacher and Gersom Scholem find it impossible to deny the Christian influence here.
>These multiple functions and roles at times sound very similar to certain strands of Catholic Mariology and ecclesiology. More than one scholar has explored how the Kabbalistic Shekinah may have been influenced by the Marian theology of the 13th century, especially with respect to exegeses of the Song of Songs.
>Pico saw the Kabbalistic teachings (especially those of the Zohar) as manifestly open to Christian interpretation. He says in the Oration on the Dignity of Man that reading Kabbalistic books: There was to be found the mystery of the Trinity, the Incarnation of the Word, the divinity of the Messiah; there one might also read of original sin, of its expiation by Christ
>Reuchlin shared Pico’s enthusiasm for the Kabbalah (particularly the Zohar) as a tool for evangelization. He was also convinced that the primary Catholic dogmas could be demonstrated from these texts and continued the reading of the name of Jesus as the Tetragrammaton made visible
>It also gives Catholics a chance to go further in our ecumenical conversation on several fronts. Toward Judaism, it opens up a conversation about of the influence of Christianity on medieval Kabbalah

he even recognized the historical position of the church on against kabbalah despite his liberal biases
>1. Pico della Mirandola (1463-1494)
<In February 1487, Pope Innocent VIII halted the proposed debate, and established a commission to review the orthodoxy of the 900 Theses. Although Pico answered the charges against them, thirteen theses were condemned. Pico agreed in writing to retract them, but he did not change his mind about their validity. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giovanni_Pico_della_Mirandola
>Because he spoke fervently and eloquently concerning human dignity and the sapiential dimension of Christian life, some have mischaracterized him as a precursor to secular humanism or even suggested that he was guilty of a most un-Christian lust for forbidden knowledge.
>The ecclesial and political hierarchies moved from suspicion and outright hostility toward Catholic Kabbalah to curiosity and encouragement in a miraculously short amount of time. Not only were these traditions no longer censured, they were public theology at the papal and imperial court.

other objections:

>Unlike Pico, Reuchlin, and Giles, Fisher never wrote a volume on Christian Kabbalah and did not expand its horizons.
even if st john fisher doesn't against catholic kabbalah, neither did he view it as a doctrine of the church, but simply a useful rhetorical tool

>but Wolfson demonstrates that Pico and Reuchlin were not cherry-picking hermeneutic strategies from Kabbalah, they were embracing the full significance of religious ritual as theurgy
(((Elliot R. Wolfson))) is a literal kike, so the article acknowledge they think catholics and kabbalah is compatible, doesn't mean the church agree that

>>21899
Got It man.((((These people))) Are everywhere trying to subvert our religion

>>21900
bro… we are in a kabbalist witchcraft thread, of course our religion being raped by (((them))) is the main focus on this specific topic, doesn't mean kikes are especially everywhere in our church, when the wolves in sheep clothing could be any race not limited to kikes or jeets

>>21900
and if your question was on our obsession on our enemies in general, then the problem isn't that we only speak of enemy, is just that you have always been outside of the church and all your attention was focused on conflict. even if i showed essence of the church within, like the ontology of trinity himself being one God as i explained early, you just ignore those "boring" part and thought all i only spoke about was kikes. so all you see in christians were to distinguish themselves away from others and even among christians for the most part. yet on the matters of secure boundaries, calling out larpers or grifters for pretending to be ingroup or just being parasites, every community or organization would have the same exact problem. it wasn't that we don't show the whole picture within the church which christians live in harmony, like being pure in front of God by go to confession before take communion in mass etc, it was not that we gatekeeping the loving part of our religion. the real problem is just that you hate being bored

>>21900
even assume you were in a state if without christian mysticism you would go full on pagan. there were egyptian desert fathers, st ephrem, st hildegard, st teresa avila, don bosco, padre pio, st charbel, bl anne catherine emmerich and more mystics with extensive visions and methods for meditation which beyond most christians have experienced. there is no need to limit yourself to appeal to any magic

>>21894
Both are the same evil god, both sides of the same thing, therefore the demiurge/yaldabaoth/rex mundi/samael/any other names he have, and therefore saturn.
The lucifer shit was a confusion of the hebrew name of (((satan))) and that translation ended up to judaism and christianity (sure it would be similar in the case of islam), lucifer is actually the name of what it seems to be a Roman god (or a divine figure but pretty a concept in Roman mythology and philosophy), it seems to be an equivalent of the Greek gods Phosphorus and Prometheus, in Gnosticism lucifer is also a figure with a similar and important role.

>>21904
>therefore the demiurge/yaldabaoth/rex mundi/samael/any other names he have
false, those were simply fake names (((satan))) the dragon larp as the creator of the universe, that's why your fake gnostic religion depicts (((demiurge))) as lion head snake, which based on the church tradition it was simply an idol of (((satan))), as st irenaeus had always knew all about them and rejected all of those idols. the real name of God YHWH was a proto-phoenician letters refer to "he will be" as prophet moses called God by that name, as moses knew God himself would incarnate as the human savior, and the reason we call him "he" even when God called himself "i am who i am" because we his creations will never use "I" to refer to God who has always been beyond us

>lucifer is actually the name of what it seems to be a Roman god
false, it is just a latin word for "agent of light" which even jesus the son of God himself has been referred to as lucifer in some catholic latin prayers. the word "luci" could be refer to anything, so it is irrelevant even if pagans use that word for light. the point of call (((satan))) lucifer was only because he claimed to be a god according to Ezekiel 28, so in Isaiah 14 the fallen angel of light is the (((demiurge))) = (((beelzebub))) = (((satan))) who pretend to be YHWH as you fall into his lies
<a pre-monarchic archaic vocalization from another dialect than classical Hebrew, hence Yahweh instead of expected *Yihweh; compare יִהְיֶה (yihyeh, “he will be”).
<Paleo-Hebrew is attested in inscriptions from about the 10th century BCE, when it was almost identical to Phoenician and other Canaanite languages
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%D7%99%D7%94%D7%95%D7%94#Hebrew
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_Hebrew


>other names he have, and therefore saturn.
>it seems to be an equivalent of the Greek gods Phosphorus and Prometheus. in Gnosticism lucifer is also a figure with a similar and important role.
not only those claims have no historical evidence to be proven, you totally ignored the fact our Lord YHWH is the one and only eternal Father, which all of the (((idols))) above that you mentioned, none of them claim to have to be our Father, and all of them were simply (((slave masters))) of mankind, which is the exact definition of (((demons))). there is a reason kikes and their (((top goyim muslim))) never once call their (((hashem and allah))) the heavenly Father like christians, because their (((slave master))) = (((baal))) = (((demons of satan))) has no son to be their savior

and even if any other (((idolaters))) call those (((idols))) "YHWH" "𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄" "ι αω" before christians existed, we already knew heretics has always been around since the beginning, and those godless israelitees turned into (((rabbinic kikes)), so those were just false allocations made up by (((satan))), none of those idols refer to the eternal father and his only son like the God of the catholic church does

>>21952
what is Kekistan brown white supremacist larper have to do with my christpill based catholic rebuttal against pantied and sissified gnosticism