[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ ss / craft ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]

A banner for soyjak.party

/tv/ - Television & Film

The kinoplex is open
Catalog
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

 β„–24455[Quote]

NOBODY 2 Trailer (2025)

 β„–24456[Quote]

No arrow therefore you look like Bob Odenkirk and there is a text labeled "Trailer HD" floating next to you

 β„–24457[Quote]

File: 1737424420527i.gif πŸ“₯︎ (7.34 MB, 400x370) ImgOps

>Somebody 3 Teaser (2026)

 β„–24458[Quote]

don't care

 β„–24459[Quote]

File: b27cbca4600c1ead4928a51368….gif πŸ“₯︎ (7.63 MB, 720x720) ImgOps

>No arrow therefore you look like Bob Odenkirk and there is a text labeled "Trailer HD" floating next to you

 β„–24460[Quote]

Bob odenkirk WABAG

 β„–24461[Quote]

oben odenkike said racism le bad once

 β„–24462[Quote]

I remember the fight scene on the bus from the first movie that was cool but then the rest of the movie I didn't watch because it's boring

 β„–24463[Quote]

>>24460
who's bob odenkirk

 β„–24464[Quote]

It’s like better call Saul became John wick or something I’m trans btw

 β„–24466[Quote]

I didn't really like the first one. I think the market's just overpopulated with these "Better watch out, that random 40-something whipped dad might be a secret badass!" wish fulfillment movies. And what do you know, he's going to run into the only white criminals on Earth every single time. So far this one's covered the Russian mob and now southern bootleggers. What'll we get for the third, a secret sect of IRA terrorists? Fuck off, I'll see your movie when he decimates a gang of niggers trafficking drugged whores to the Diddy parties.

 β„–24472[Quote]

Digusting beta male looking loser as main character.
Pass.

 β„–24477[Quote]

He looks like such a loser.
I don't get it. When you look at the most viewed and most liked porn stars on the top porn sites, the female porn stars are always ugly as fuck or they are a parody of what an attractive girl should be.
I swear, the masses of men are so dysgenic and pathetic that they would watch movies with such unattractive characters.
Add the majority of men being attractive and the endless hordes of mutts and orcs from all over the world and movies like this gets made.
Him and his character is literally playing the "average male nice guy husband" character. It is so gross.

 β„–24483[Quote]

File: puzzled_mj_by_nospmas_dg8c….jpg πŸ“₯︎ (479.23 KB, 2270x2914) ImgOps

>>24477
Make Women Beautiful Again.

 β„–24485[Quote]

File: saul supports pedos.gif πŸ“₯︎ (3.67 MB, 640x640) ImgOps

>>24455 (OP)
It's Shekels Goyman.

 β„–24497[Quote]

>>24483
Like do people not realize they are going to be watching a movie for 2 hours?
Who wants to look at this raisin for two hours?

 β„–24524[Quote]

>>24497
Blind and deaf people, maybe lol
I mean hellywoke wants to virtue signal as much as possible. Maybe the actual physically disabled who are unable to properly pay attention to films are indeed their primary target audience.

 β„–24529[Quote]

>>24524
I know there are tons of people on /tv/ on 4chan that would just pretend the wokeness isn't there lol.
Imagine being such a cuck and watching cuck raisin and then pretending it is not there.

 β„–24660[Quote]

>>24477
A woman typed this

 β„–24661[Quote]

>>24660
What is wrong with what was posted?
Look at this Bob Odenkirk guy, look at how he looks irl, how at the character he is playing. His character is literally "the every day mid guy" and they casted a mid guy to play the character.
With the top porn video thing, I noticed it too.
Go on any porn site, and the most viewed porn videos and most popular videos are always of unattractive females. Not only are they unnattractive, they are a parody of what is attractive.
Big fake lips, fake tits, too big ass, etc etc.
So what is giving these videos views? A huge population of mid men.
Majority of men irl are mid. The bottom 70% of men population is huge and is at least double the top 20% population. It makes sense that society, media and everything is skewed to favor the majority to get the most viewers.

 β„–24678[Quote]

>>24529
4trans is run by tranny pedophiles and entirely made up of jeets, niggers, and cucks now. It's an unusable site now because it's enveloped in so much reddit-tier cringe that whatever somewhat good stuff might be left is buried under mountains of subversive cringe.

 β„–24681[Quote]

File: Screenshot_20250305_195013….jpg πŸ“₯︎ (150.06 KB, 1078x1146) ImgOps

>>24524
The Cheese Tax
The Cheese Tax
You gotta pay the Cheese Tax

 β„–24682[Quote]

File: Screenshot_20250331_160821….jpg πŸ“₯︎ (291.86 KB, 1079x1116) ImgOps

>>24678
>>24678
>>24678
You gotta pay the cheese tax every time you're cooking
When the cheese comes out this puppy comes looking

 β„–24683[Quote]

>>24661
That's not what's going on at all. The ugliest men still fap to hot women, the women you describe aren't "mid" they're appealing to a specific obscure fetish you've evidently got the algorithm thinking you're into, "bimboification". Everything you described, fake lips, bolt on implants, fake ass, that's bimboification. It appeals to a specific subset of men who hate the absolute fuck out of women.

You're not thinking four dimensionally enough. When you go to a porn site and click "most viewed" you're assuming that's representative of Earth's entire population. If I go to eporner, the top two videos are both of Indian/Pakistani women, what does that tell me? The site is likely getting a lot of it's traffic from one of those countries. Before it went down, mrdeepfakes most popular category was korean actresses and singers, is that because they're the most beautiful? No, it's because the guys making the fake videos and even the guy running the site were Korean. If I went to a website and all the top viewed content was BDSM I'd go "Oh, this site is popular with women and/or trannies." In an AMA with one of the Jews running pornhub someone asked him why they were pushing incest porn so hard, because if you go there an ungodly amount of the videos feature some variation of the stepsister plot, the owner immediately had a meltdown and said this person was accusing it of being a Jewish conspiracy, kind of a tell, huh? They've also been caught by groups like Project Veritas admitting they stick in ugly actresses and trannies to try to "trick viewers into broadening their tastes for muh lgbt". So odds are if you were looking somewhere like pornhub rather than what's actually popular you were looking at what ((they)) want you to like.

It's also important to remember these things aren't representative of the group as a whole, but of each group's subsection of gooners. Sometimes Pornhub will post one of those retarded maps and claim like "Minnesota's favorite fetish is feet." now does that actually mean everyone in Minnesota shares dna with Quinton Tarantino? No, it means it's population of gooners likely does.

For yet another example? Milf porn. Milf sounds hot in theory. Potentially an older but still hot woman who has enough of a maternal, nurturing side that she's raising a kid, but in practice if you look up milf it's just ugly whores who aged out of regular porn and went the bimboification route and got an assload of plastic surgery. I don't want to see that raisin. Meanwhile, there are porn stars I know have actually had kids like Alexa Pearl, and while she did end up getting implants to fill up her deflated titties, she's still otherwise hot.

 β„–24689[Quote]

>>24683
>The ugliest men still fap to hot women,
No, they dont, ugly people and attractive people have different standards and perception.

Also, it is like this. I try my best to put into words so bear with me.
When you look at the most watched videos of the day on YouTube, the first few videos are videos everyone/the whole world watched. However, the rest of the videos on the most watched page become a little more niche. They can include music videos, ethnic music videos or reviews of foreign or domestic TV shows. So back to the porn websites, when EVERY TOP 10 video on the most watched of the day, week, month, year are of some mid af girls, it makes sense that literally IS what the majority of men are watching.
This is for every single porn site.

If you use my Youtube most watched vs porn site most watched, you should get a grasp of what I am saying.

>milf porn

What you are saying in your post also supports what I am saying.
The FRONT PAGE vs TOP VIDEOS OF FRONT PAGE. On the youtube most watched page, there is variety, but the top 3 video is what the majority of people watched.
So when you talk about incest porn or milf porn, sure, those can be on the front page, but it is the top 3 videos that truly represents what most people are watching. Then we can go into more intricacies like viewer count between each top 3 videos, and take the average over a month, week, day or years or whatever.

TL:DR Top 3 videos represent what everyone/majority watched. Top video page represents what everyone watched but includes separate group.

Top pages of porn sites, should be AT LEAST 80% attractive girls, not 0-5%.

 β„–24690[Quote]

>>24683
> It appeals to a specific subset of men who hate the absolute fuck out of women.
So you are telling me this i the majority of men because this subset of men are able to influence every single major porn site and non-major ones. lmfao.
Don't be dumb. I am right. The majority of men are unattractive and their perception is warped.

 β„–24692[Quote]

>>24690
>So you are telling me this i the majority of men
So you are telling me this is the majority of men

 β„–24954[Quote]

File: eporner.jpg πŸ“₯︎ (474.92 KB, 1503x835, NSFW) ImgOps

File: pornhub.jpg πŸ“₯︎ (404.08 KB, 1351x941, NSFW) ImgOps

File: xhamster.jpg πŸ“₯︎ (477.16 KB, 1309x935, NSFW) ImgOps

File: motherless.jpg πŸ“₯︎ (351.16 KB, 1351x933, NSFW) ImgOps

>>24690
No, your logic doesn't follow at all.
>because this subset of men are able to influence every single major porn site and non-major ones.

I just gave you a slew of other examples. I'm telling you that you're an old bitch, basically. Look, let me put it another way for you. At one point I was living in South Texas, the algorithm started giving me recommendations of porn of fat Mexican bitches because that was what was all around me. Maybe you're shopping for adult diapers in another tab, but something has made the algorithm think this is what you like.

Alternatively YOU are suggesting that this "subset of men" making this the case on "every single major porn site" also suggests every man likes incest, trannies and morbidly obese black chicks. On top of all of this, you stupid fuck, I've never seen anything to suggest this on any of the porn sites I look at. I don't see bimbo raisin as the top viewed on ANY porn site I know of. To prove this, I'm going to take screenshots of a few different sites to show that your shortsighted, narrow and likely autistic view that your personal experience is reflective of that of EVERYONE ELSE ON EARTH is wrong.

Let's start with eporner. I see one chick with implants, not even a bimbo as she's had no work done on her face. The rest is Asian porn and in the top two sluts some hindu and some arab. Where's the bimbos fuckwit?

Next up let's try pornhub. Huh, what do you know, looks like your stupid ass was wrong again, huh? No bimbos. No collogen lips. No heavy plastic surgery. I see implants under a general tag for big tits, but… none of the raisin your goofy retarded ass said. Hm. Now according to this, the most popular categories are nigresses and obese chicks, literally the two categories men find least attractive on Earth among all groups. Do you notice something else? Look in the upper right corner. You can filter "all" or "gay". Why can't you filter out gay content? Oh, because the Jews who own this website have a stated political agenda and they skew everything to push what the want people to watch, you absolute moron.

Okay, site three, where should we look. How about xhamster? Huh, looks like you're wrong a third fucking time, stupid. It's all Indians. Huh. Well let's see, if we go by your retard logic, that means all men are into Indian women. If we go by mine, that just means this site is particularly popular with men in India. Which do you think it is imbecile?

Do I really need to embarrass you a fourth time? Okay, I checked xvideos, but can't seem to find a way to search by most viewed or popular, so on we go to motherless. Hm, but you said there would be bimbos with heavy plastic surgery and huge bolt on implants. Where are they dumbass? Where are they?

Now, if you're an adult, here's where you say "Okay, I was wrong, I admit it. I am defeated." If you're a retard (which we've established you are) this is where you move goalposts. You're either going to change the criteria and say they're mid in some other way even though before you specified fake lips, fake tits and fake ass, or completely fucking told you're going to bitch out and admit complete defeat by saying "tl;dr" and then repeating your refuted point like someone with severe brain damage would.

Get mad, stay mad, die mad.

 β„–24956[Quote]

>>24954
Not mad. I am talking about the most viewed videos not the front page btw.

 β„–24957[Quote]

>>24956
Try reading the top of each image, those *are* the most viewed videos on each respective site.

 β„–24975[Quote]

File: pathetic.jpg πŸ“₯︎ (208.8 KB, 644x1002) ImgOps

>>24954
Why must women do this raisin? Are they stupid?

 β„–24990[Quote]

>>24975
No big deal.
Majority of girls are unattractive and make up carries them and men's dick want to use them as cum dumpsters.
Majority of girls are not desirable outside of getting cummed in.
Majority of men are low value.
That is why the top videos and most viewed and highest rated films on every porn site are ugly females. Because majority of men are average at best and what they think is attractive is warped.
>>24954
And you are fucking stupid.
You are talking about the front page, I am talking about the top 5 videos on a page after you click "most videos of the day, week, month year"
What is there to argue? Go to a busy mall and look at how disgusting most people, both men and females, look.

 β„–25001[Quote]

File: image_2025-05-23_162004706.png πŸ“₯︎ (21.53 KB, 372x58) ImgOps

>>24990
>You are talking about the front page
No retard, for the second time I'm not. Look at the top of any of those images, they all say something like this you profound fucking imbecile. Every single one is the category you claimed you were looking at, and every single one does not have what you claimed it did. You're completely, 100% wrong beyond any defense or shadow of a doubt. None of them have what you claimed they did. Your entire argument was culled straight out of your ass, that's why there's nothing to argue, because you're completely wrong.

 β„–25002[Quote]

>>25001
So the most viewed porn videos are all ugly females.
What is your point?

 β„–25004[Quote]

>>25002
You specifically claimed they were all this:
>>24661
>Go on any porn site, and the most viewed porn videos and most popular videos are always of unattractive females. Not only are they unnattractive, they are a parody of what is attractive.
>Big fake lips, fake tits, too big ass, etc etc.

I went through four major porn sites most viewed video lists and none of them had "big fake lips, fake tits, too big ass". like you specifically claimed. You were wrong. You had no fucking clue what your stupid ass was talking about. Your entire claim was horseraisin. You're just dumb and autistic so you assumed your personal experience reflected everyone elses, but you've been shown it doesn't. Saying "They're all ugly" is subjective, but luckily you got specific, asserted they all had fake lips and fake boobs, they don't. The girls on every site represent different types of women and different demographics. In the case of Pornhub it was explained to you how what's promoted is manipulated because of the political motivations of the owners. Your entire claim fell apart on it's face. You don't know what the fuck you're talking about, and that has been extensively proven. To even pretend they're all ugly at this point is to admit you're gay because it's such a broad selection of completely different looking women you would be claiming all women are ugly, which would just make you a faggot.

So are you wrong or are you both wrong and a faggot? Because those are your options right now.

 β„–25005[Quote]

>>25004
>most popular videos are always of unattractive females.
How was he wrong about this?

 β„–25008[Quote]

>>25004
I think he was saying that most of the girls on the most view porn videos page are of unattractive girls which I agree with.

 β„–25011[Quote]

>>25008
>>25005
Terrible samefagging

 β„–25013[Quote]

>>25011
Who is samefagging? I am not the OP.

 β„–25016[Quote]

>>25004
>>Go on any porn site, and the most viewed porn videos and most popular videos are always of unattractive females. Not only are they unnattractive, they are a parody of what is attractive.
This is not wrong.

 β„–25025[Quote]

>>25008
>>25005
>>25016
See, this is what I said you'd do way back when I screenshotted the pages. I told you that you'd move goalposts and just assert the girls were ugly anyway, but you're omitting that you specified they have "fake lips, fake tits, too big asses" and that's not present in any of the pages. Not one has a woman with lip injections or a giant ass. There were a few implants, but they were the exception. There's such a broad range of women and fetishes that again to assert "They're ugly anyway" just makes you sound like a faggot. There are white women, Asian women, black women, Indian women. Women with large breasts, women with small breasts, middle ages women, young women. There are so many different fucking categories there that to assert "No, they're all still ugly even if they don't meet the specific criteria I said" just indicates you hate women in general and are thus, a fagalagadingdong. I'm saying you suck dick don, you're a peter-puffer, a goo-gobbler. You can guess the flavor of a condom by sitting on it. You invite men to join you on a tour of Hershey Highway. Gay.

 β„–25031[Quote]

>>25025
I said ugly girls and girls with those attributes.

 β„–25032[Quote]

>>25025
Whats wrong with hating females? lol

 β„–25033[Quote]

>>25025
And those posts arent mine.

 β„–25034[Quote]

>>25025
I think he was trying to say most of the girls on the top pages are simply unattractive. And this is because majority of men are unattractive also making their standards warped.

 β„–25035[Quote]


 β„–25036[Quote]

>>25034
>he
Nigger that's you.

 β„–25054[Quote]

>>25036
Thats not him, it was me.

 β„–25055[Quote]

>>25036
This anon thinks every poster in here is from the same person kek

 β„–25096[Quote]

>>25055
>>25054
Retard ESL

 β„–25097[Quote]


 β„–25098[Quote]

>>25097
Stupid nigger



[Return][Catalog][Go to top][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard ] [ soy / qa / raid / r ] [ ss / craft ] [ int / pol ] [ a / an / asp / biz / mtv / r9k / tech / v / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ wiki / booru / irc ]