â„–28582[Quote]
no it's not. kys
â„–28592[Quote]
its trash
â„–28604[Quote]
I do agree
â„–28606[Quote]
FreeBSD has no usecase openbsd is better in every single way
â„–28618[Quote]
>>28606Yeah until you need to use a journaling file system
â„–28684[Quote]
its satanique and evil
â„–28694[Quote]
>>28620you said "no usecase" and I presented you with one that literally isn't even possible to achieve on openbsd cause of their autism against journaling filesystems
â„–28700[Quote]
>>28694Journeying file systems have no usecase
â„–28744[Quote]
>>28700ok you are just a moron
â„–28793[Quote]
>>28744Cope snca about FreeBSD is worse in every way
â„–28819[Quote]
i know a bunch of servers and snca use that but is it usable in a normal desktop? are there games? does it have hekin office work blaablabah programs?
â„–28849[Quote]
>>28793>worse in every wayHave fun running fsck on your hard drive every time your computer shuts off or crashes.
â„–29442[Quote]
>It's pretty good, actually
-Direct lineage to UNIX itself
-Complete operating system
-Comes with a vm
-No GNU,poetteringware,or any other linux junk
-Actually comprehensible directory hierarchy
-Easy install
-Easy package management, ports is a good backup
-Easy, simple kernel recompilation on the fly
-Sane, shell-based init
-Sane, netbsd-based curses
-Linux binary compatibility layer
-Actually readable default font-scale in framebuffer
-First-class OpenBSD networking server support
Beats the fuck out of linux in my book GNU or not