/tech/ - Soyence and Technology

>>25316 (OP)
doesnt this lang glow

Use C or Assembly o algo.

>>25325
no, it filters jeets / niggers by design. also it's not popular enough to attract that sort of attention anyway

Read learn you a haskell for great good, it is free online

Gemmy idea, however I'm too jeeted to not understand le non C-syntax

>>25316 (OP)
what can ts do that c can't

>>25358
this o algo así

>>25326
actually use fortran

>muh c
you will never be a systems programmer ranjesh

>>25362
nigga sybau this is the soyjak website you're as unemployed as the rest of us i bet you don't even know what calloc is used for. cunt

>>25361
I use COBOL

>>25326
>>25361
>>25370
Use BASIC because it's aryan

>>25371
use B or assembly o algo

>>25371
Yo momma basic boy

>>25358
polymorphic types (aka "generics" for javajeets), for starters. c is useful, but it is also extremely limited and it shows if you try to do something nontrivial or useful in it.
>>25371
basic is dogshit pushed by bill gates and other retards. one of the most retarded languages of all time
>but you don't understand we need 30 goto 10 in order to work on shitty hardware
we had lisp before basic, go fuck yourself

haskell is a beautiful language for learning cool concepts and patterns, but terrible for job hunting because it's dnb. Scala/OCaml/Rust are similar but at least you can be hired

>>25326
C and C++ is jeetslop because a lot of wannabe programmers and students learn basics in it for a semester and never improve their skills

>>25358
in terms of capability nothing, every program can be just hardcoded in C but it can (and will) be much buggier and unmainteinable coal
Haskell gives you much clearer semantics for programs, treating everything as a function (and as a value), so it becomes easier to compose
Like in C a program is a set of instructions where you explicitly tell a nigger machine what to do, what to store, what syscall to execute et cetera, taking an imperative stance
In haskell a program is a value, everything is a function and a value so it becomes much easier to compose programs and wrap programs (like adding a logger or a context). Kinda like a lego
Also the difference becomes much cleaner when you start to work with actual code issues like asynchronous calls, this is where functional approach with treating programs as a value shines and why every language effectively stole this concept (Java's Futures, Goroutines, tokio task, etc)

>>25505
Also Haskell's type system is much stronger than in C. In Haskell you have liquid types, typeclasses, higher order functions
All of this greatly helps with writing bug-free code. With liquid types you can wrap over other types such as String to create a type that represents a String with less than 10 characters, or Positive Integer. This moves a lot of runtime verification into static, so you can catch a bug before it hits prod
In general you can build your programs in Haskell with treating types as a business entities and set business logic as a relation between them. It does not prevent all bugs especially with wrong product input, but it allows for much cleaner translation from business needs and actual code

>>25326
overrated nocoder meme
>>25501
rust and scala, sure. pretty much nobody gets hired for knowing how to write ocaml though
>>25508
liquidhaskell is an extension of haskell though and not everyone uses it.

up

>>25528
>pretty much nobody gets hired for knowing how to write ocaml though
hft firms like jane street use it

>>25912
99% of hft firms use just plain C++ though

i used it for my uni courses cos my uni sed so