I hate that Joogle abounded their Basic HTML style that looked good & ran fast on computers to just force everything on some corpo looking minimalism that eats your memory and you can't go back to them anymore since Joogle ack it in 2024 i know there has b

Email
Subject
Comment
Verification	Please type the name of the object/variant:
File
Embed
Voice
Poll
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (726.84 KB, 1157x645) ImgOps

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (529.5 KB, 1280x720) ImgOps

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (246.96 KB, 640x360) ImgOps

Chud 12/06/25 (Sat) 21:49:40 №22661 [Quote]

I hate that Joogle abounded their Basic HTML style that looked good & ran fast on computers to just force everything on some corpo looking minimalism that eats your memory and you can't go back to them anymore since Joogle ack it in 2024 i know there has been some revivals but majority of them suck any good ones?

Chud 12/07/25 (Sun) 01:17:22 №22667 [Quote]

>>22661 (OP)
this ui looks very nice

Chud 12/07/25 (Sun) 04:34:46 №22674 [Quote]

>>22667
It does it reminds a bit of sharty/4cucks ui the best about is was that it was very customizable

Chud 12/07/25 (Sun) 05:28:48 №22675 [Quote]

>hire crap developers
>crap developers demand ridiculous levels of hardware for the task so their job is easier. They promise it will be cheaper this way.
And it just keeps going down this path.

Chud 12/07/25 (Sun) 06:00:01 №22677 [Quote]

>>22675
Funny cause you think the more it goes simple it becomes more easier to run but it's the exact opposite geg

Chud 12/07/25 (Sun) 23:07:50 №22733 [Quote]

>>22677
yeah how the fuck it became slower with this minimalist design? You would think it is only simple DOM structure and some CSS styling, but no

Chud 12/07/25 (Sun) 23:25:50 №22736 [Quote]

>>22733
it's all because of the amount of useless effects they put in to material design which came out in 2014 after the bad redesign of JFK from 2011

Chud 12/08/25 (Mon) 02:01:30 №22738 [Quote]

>>22675
>crap developers
you can just say indians you know

Chud 12/09/25 (Tue) 03:30:53 №22788 [Quote]

>>22738
sarrrrrrr

Chud 12/10/25 (Wed) 06:41:43 №22829 [Quote]

>>22736
original material design btfos current designs

Chud 12/10/25 (Wed) 15:59:49 №22839 [Quote]

>>22829
I agree but basic html era will always be the best imo for how well it run and customizable it was

Chud 12/11/25 (Thu) 09:16:26 №22881 [Quote]

I fucking hate that everything runs on jeetascript now, it's impossible to browse the net on my old msdos 6.21 pc

Chud 12/11/25 (Thu) 20:18:44 №22923 [Quote]

>>22881
TRVKE

Chud 12/21/25 (Sun) 00:05:48 №23318 [Quote]

It looks so clean even today, i miss it

Chud 12/21/25 (Sun) 23:51:47 №23351 [Quote]

>>23318
yeah all because of it's compact size which i miss when layouts were made for pc users and not iphone cucks

Chud 12/21/25 (Sun) 23:53:19 №23352 [Quote]

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (455.37 KB, 934x934) ImgOps

Also the icons during this time were so cool and colorful

Chud 01/11/26 (Sun) 15:34:24 №24720 [Quote]

>>22661 (OP)
why did they remove dont they know that shitty devices cant run shit

Chud 01/11/26 (Sun) 15:56:46 №24721 [Quote]

nostalgiacuck thread

Chud 01/12/26 (Mon) 04:45:02 №24764 [Quote]

>>24720
profit

Chud 01/15/26 (Thu) 00:05:46 №25082 [Quote]

File: 1766166119041v.png 📥︎ (23.6 KB, 251x338) ImgOps

>nostalgiacuck thread

Chud 01/15/26 (Thu) 00:07:41 №25083 [Quote]

>I fucking hate that everything runs on jeetascript now, it's impossible to browse the net on my old msdos 6.21 pc

Websites nowadays are held together by tape and will easily fall apart

Chud 01/15/26 (Thu) 00:09:18 №25084 [Quote]

>I hate that Joogle abounded their Basic HTML style that looked good & ran fast on computers to just force everything on some corpo looking minimalism that eats your memory and you can't go back to them anymore since Joogle ack it in 2024 i know there has been some revivals but majority of them suck any good ones?

wiby search engine and marginalia.nu