â„–18938583[Quote]
vp
â„–18938614[Quote]
>>18938565 (OP)Nusoi who wasn't there for the time when most of its use was non-pedophilic
â„–18938620[Quote]
a nigger linked the 'assy and those pedos use her for every post
she is a pedo symbol theres no going back
keep xer banned
â„–18938631[Quote]
>>18938614oldaryan here, it was a mixed bag as the sharty isn't (I hope) the same individual and each person used it very differently.
there's innocent use of 'lita to depict a child and there's indeed child abuse 'jaks
â„–18938640[Quote]
>>18938620apparently the color palette used is straight up the map flag
â„–18938647[Quote]
>>18938614It was always very divisive, and a lot of its use was indeed pedophilic. This should NOT be such a massive push at all
â„–18938677[Quote]
every lita supporter talks about this issue as if it's our current biggest concern that we don't have enough ways to depict kids keep this shit banned
â„–18938762[Quote]
>>18938694Pedophiles would probably be happy that their shitty "culture" is finally being accepted by the sharty. It's a bad idea in every way.
â„–18938802[Quote]
>>18938762The solution is to ban anyone who tries to self-insert as or exclusively posts soylita for an hour for rule 8, repeated offenses will extend the length to 3 days or a week or longer. We know what you're doing faggot.
â„–18938807[Quote]
>>18938802What if instead we just banned pedophilia
â„–18938872[Quote]
>>18938856I should say rapeson-style prison rape memes. Not rapeson the soyjak.
â„–18938874[Quote]
>>18938762>Pedophiles would probably be happy that their shitty "culture" is finally being accepted by the sharty.They probably would but then overtime they would seethe about soyteens are desensitized to 'lita where a soyteen would find it a nusiance at worst and how they aren't receiving any "OYY DOCTOS" replies.
â„–18938881[Quote]
i don't give a shit either way but it's funny that you can glorify pedophilia """ironically""" all you want now but posting any random thing with 2 frames of le squished gapejak in it still gets you banned
â„–18938892[Quote]
>>18938802Just keep soylita banned man
â„–18938898[Quote]
>>18938802just keep her banned
â„–18938903[Quote]
>>18938881Writing graphic descriptions of child rape is allowed as long as you attach the buff grey man but don't you dare post that variant.
â„–18938904[Quote]
>>18938881Exactly rulecucked shithole
â„–18938905[Quote]
>>18938890the url is auto bannable for old rule 1 so niggers just try to bypsss it
â„–18938915[Quote]
>>18938905i remember one of the tor nodes got banned for that
â„–18938920[Quote]
>>18938881OGD should be banned too it's brutally retarded that salt thought that was a good idea
â„–18938926[Quote]
>>18938920Go back to the Swinny
â„–18938950[Quote]
>>18938565 (OP)It's all the fault of the inferior race, the subhuman Angl*s the supreme cucks of the earth. Kneel before the superior Castizan race of Monterrey.
â„–18938952[Quote]
>>18938936what use does she even have
â„–18938971[Quote]
>>18938881>>18938903>>18938904What's even the different between posting a MAPjak (besides it being a soyquote), an OGD that has to do with raping children versus a single image of 'lita regardless of any context?
'lita is only allowed in old videos without sexual intent
â„–18938985[Quote]
>>18938971Just ban porn of soylita it's that simple
â„–18938986[Quote]
>>18938976nobody said this
â„–18939003[Quote]
The pop tart commercial toss will always be a gem and makes me geg and 'lita was used in it so I can't even post it without getting banned
â„–18939021[Quote]
>>18939003i think you can still post it since its an old smv. if a janny leaks you can always appeal
â„–18939035[Quote]
>>18939021some guy posted the east germany smv and it got auto approved
â„–18939037[Quote]
>>18938985Ban all pedophilic edits of her in general
â„–18939041[Quote]
STUPID SOYIM DONT FORGET THE COLOR SCHEME
â„–18939047[Quote]
>>18938976>it existed when le site was created>so it must be goodgiga?
â„–18939056[Quote]
>>18939041side note did the person who made the map flag ever get 'oxed
â„–18939064[Quote]
>>18939047Invisible giga.
â„–18939065[Quote]
>>18939035that means the video is allowed
â„–18939072[Quote]
>>18938976It's still pedophilic even if it's from early sharty
â„–18939079[Quote]
>>18938985TSMT
ban the pedoniggers making sexual comments over her too also
â„–18939095[Quote]
>>18939065each janny is different i got banned for 15 minutes one time for posting the hanging 'assycuck image
â„–18939097[Quote]
>>18938985>>18938993>>18938996>>18939037what would be the janny guideline to deleting soylita posts if she as an image was unbanned? the porn and obvious pedophilia promotion definitely should be banned but idk what else
â„–18939127[Quote]
>>18938631Other oldfag here, I can confirm this is true
Unfortunately now it's basically leaned into all of it being pro-pedophilia and given the state of Salt's Sharty I'd rather it stay gone (unless pedophilic use is explicitly banned). One thing I do hate is the booru retroactively deleting every post that had them which wiped out a lot of gems because "OYYYYY DOC TOOOOS FUGGEN SOYLITAAAA IS DA JERDEEEEEE"
â„–18939132[Quote]
>>18939095is this the reason?
>Pending ban request. â„–18939144[Quote]
>>18939127the booru wipe was my concern about 'lita posts. they like nuked all of them with a blind eye but leave shoyta posts up
â„–18939156[Quote]
>>18939097Probably self-inserting, shit like neutralita.
â„–18939163[Quote]
>>18939144some nigger kept posting sproketan just 2 weeks ago
â„–18939173[Quote]
>>18939097this is way too complicated instead of just keeping her banned. i guess old SMV can be an exception but other than that no
>but i iz uh 2025 era oldchad and i remembah when everybawdy loved her until like she gawt banned everything old is gud because da wikee said soeverybody always had mixed opinions and it's nowadays almost exclusively pedophilic when it is used. do we REALLY have to go so far just to have one more soyjak to depict children
â„–18939175[Quote]
>>18938694Reclaiming one of the worst sharty memes is not a good idea as it was literally intended to be a pdf meme in the first place. Theres a difference between ancestors of vikings reclaiming a viking symbol stolen by nazis that was never intended to be a fascist symbol in the first place or reclaiming an insult being used against you as a badge of honor, and trying to "reclaim" a literal pedo dogwhistle. Its like trying to reclaim the KKK logo, something that originated AS a logo for an infamous terrorist group, as a symbol of peace. Back in 2012 there was a KKK group that wanted to stop being racist and just be a normal social group and of course it failed miserably as it should.
Yes, i know The KKK wasnt founded as a full-blown terrorist group but rather a social group, but it was a social group for people who did terrorist attacks and war crimes during the civil war and would willingly do those stuff again if they could, much like waffen-SS social groups like HIAG from post-ww2 that were made up of people who did war crimes. And both of those groups turned violent.
Reclaiming the KKK symbol or s0yl1ta would be just like trying to reclaim those "b0y/g1rl l0v3r" symbols invented and used by pedophile degenerates to express that they are degenerates that jesus would not approve of.
â„–18939180[Quote]
>>18939144and now classics like FDJ aren't even accessible through the Booru without a bunch of censor boxes everywhere. Wtf is the point of having a 'jak archive if you're not going to archive them properly