â„–18870956[Quote]
>Voluntary sexual interaction between children and olders is, uncorrelated with maladjustment or any adverse effects. Studies purporting harm or pervasiveness often use clinical samples, which are unapplicable to the GP and which account for little to no confounding variables. When family environment and unwilling participation are controlled for (see Rind B & tromovitch, p, 1997; rind et al. 1998; Skaug, E, 2022; Ulrich et al, 2008) the effect size becomes almost nonexistent, and synonomous with adult sex
>Intervention from law enforcement and social workers where kids are traumatized, or traumatised further through repeated interrogation, therapy, and gaslighting the child into believing they've been irreversibly damaged: (Jones et all 2005: Hines and Finkelhor 2006: sandfort 1987.)
>No different in psychological adjustment between willing participants and legally non-abused individuals, as adults (Areola et al 2008; Stanley et al 2004; Rind, B, 2001,; Rind B, 2021.)
â„–18871116[Quote]
Your argument fundamentally misrepresents what the cited research demonstrates.
First, Rind et al. (1998) did not establish that adult–child sexual activity is harmless. Their meta-analysis relied on college samples and was challenged in published methodological critiques, including Dallam et al. (2001) and Ondersma et al. (2001). A small average correlation does not demonstrate that an experience is harmless or that its effects disappear in every subgroup.
Second, the assertion that controlling for family dysfunction eliminates adverse associations is contradicted by population-based research. Kendler et al. (2000) and Nelson et al. (2002) used twin comparisons to address shared family background and still found elevated risks among participants reporting childhood sexual abuse. Fergusson et al. (2008), using longitudinal birth-cohort data, also found associations persisting after adjustment for social, family, and individual characteristics.
Third, Arreola et al. (2008) did not find universally equivalent outcomes. Even participants who described their childhood sexual experiences as consensual showed elevated substance-use and HIV-risk measures compared with those reporting no such experiences.
Fourth, research on the additional distress caused by poorly conducted investigations does not establish that the original abuse was harmless. It establishes that protective interventions should be handled carefully. Randomized trials and systematic reviews also provide some evidence that appropriately delivered psychological treatment can reduce post-traumatic symptoms.
Finally, absence of a measurable psychiatric disorder is not proof of informed consent, absence of exploitation, or equivalence to consensual sex between adults.
The defensible scientific conclusion is that experiences and outcomes vary, confounding factors matter, and not every victim develops psychopathology. It is not that sexual interaction between adults and children is harmless, consensual in the adult sense, or equivalent to sex between consenting adults.
TLDR: Kill yourself pedo nyaaaaa~
â„–18871144[Quote]
>>18871116I'm not gonna gigaquote this to clog up the thread but, you're a gigachad
â„–18871150[Quote]
File: gif.gif 📥︎ (344.11 KB, 1251x630) ec670bd8331933e6cc8986799d99311963a6cc59e71934e63986833676660ff80ImgOps
File: gif.gif 📥︎ (344.11 KB, 1251x630) ec670bd8331933e6cc8986799d99311963a6cc59e71934e63986833676660ff80ImgOps
File: gif.gif 📥︎ (344.11 KB, 1251x630) ec670bd8331933e6cc8986799d99311963a6cc59e71934e63986833676660ff80ImgOps
File: gif.gif 📥︎ (344.11 KB, 1251x630) ec670bd8331933e6cc8986799d99311963a6cc59e71934e63986833676660ff80ImgOps
