[ home / overboard ] [ date ] [ soy / qa / raid / incel ] [ int / pol ] [ a / biz / fit / mtv / r9k / sude / tech / v / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ booru / wiki ]

A banner for soyjak.party

/soy/ - Soyjaks

soyjaks and other associated gems
Catalog
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (1.52 MB, 1914x877) ImgOps

 â„–18688039[Quote]

Why were dolicochephalic phenotypes (long skulls) so common in ancient humans?

 â„–18688083[Quote]

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (732.46 KB, 1103x517) ImgOps

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (1.05 MB, 1188x608) ImgOps

The same can be said with portraits of europeans during the middle ages with the occurence of brachycephalization causing their bone structures to shorten over centuries. the effects can be seen within the 19th century

 â„–18688087[Quote]

File: 1779409780537158.jpg 📥︎ (62.97 KB, 1080x1078) ImgOps

ITS TOO RAPED AND NIGGERFIED

 â„–18688121[Quote]

If you were to ask me, I think doliocochephaly was a result of incest, there's just something in gene inheritance that causes it, although I don't know the specific genes and this is just my own conjecture

 â„–18688132[Quote]

I feel like it matters because doliocochephalic = more bone mass, longer skulls are also far more universally attractive than shorter skulls

 â„–18688163[Quote]

Also, I'm pretty sure dolicochephalic phenotypes differ inbetween dog species aswell, and every single phenotype of dog has been a result of incest

Therefore I think it's necessary to conclude that a lack of incest is actually making people uglier

 â„–18688207[Quote]

Unironically, racemixxing and non incestuous relationships has caused mankind to become uglier



[Return][Catalog][Go to top][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard ] [ date ] [ soy / qa / raid / incel ] [ int / pol ] [ a / biz / fit / mtv / r9k / sude / tech / v / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ booru / wiki ]