№18636415[Quote]
Something I have noticed about lolipedos is how they choose which arguments they decide to engage in or flat-out ignore.
If Braniggers see any vulnerabilities in your argument or if they're able to abuse any logical fallacies, they might engage. But if your argument actually challenges and undermines their beliefs, they will pussy out and pretend as if they have never seen your post.
They are cowards, parasites. They will argue in bad faith, and because they're the status quo of Twitter (as well as grooming normies into their sexual degeneracy via Frieren and Pragmata), they will almost always "win" arguments against antis (by winning, I mean ratioing their opponent, as in getting more likes and retweets than their opponent)
This is why anti-lolicon posts by trannies, furries, and leftists garner way more replies from lolicons, while anti-lolicon posts by right-wingers get little to no traction. To them, MAGAmutts are the only right-wingers you can criticise. If you dare criticise Braniggers for being porn-addicted shitskinned pedos, then you're a heckin leftist tranny!
The status quo of Twitter sucks. Branigger lolipedos aren't even "far-right" like leftists claim, they're milquetoast center-right at best.
№18636453[Quote]
TRVTHNUKE
№18636455[Quote]
>Something I have noticed about lolipedos is how they choose which arguments they decide to engage in or flat-out ignore.
>If Braniggers see any vulnerabilities in your argument or if they're able to abuse any logical fallacies, they might engage. But if your argument actually challenges and undermines their beliefs, they will pussy out and pretend as if they have never seen your post.
>They are cowards, parasites. They will argue in bad faith, and because they're the status quo of Twitter (as well as grooming normies into their sexual degeneracy via Frieren and Pragmata), they will almost always "win" arguments against antis (by winning, I mean ratioing their opponent, as in getting more likes and retweets than their opponent)
>This is why anti-lolicon posts by trannies, furries, and leftists garner way more replies from lolicons, while anti-lolicon posts by right-wingers get little to no traction. To them, MAGAmutts are the only right-wingers you can criticise. If you dare criticise Braniggers for being porn-addicted shitskinned pedos, then you're a heckin leftist tranny!
>The status quo of Twitter sucks. Branigger lolipedos aren't even "far-right" like leftists claim, they're milquetoast center-right at best.
№18636470[Quote]
>>Something I have noticed about lolipedos is how they choose which arguments they decide to engage in or flat-out ignore.
>>If Braniggers see any vulnerabilities in your argument or if they're able to abuse any logical fallacies, they might engage. But if your argument actually challenges and undermines their beliefs, they will pussy out and pretend as if they have never seen your post.
>>They are cowards, parasites. They will argue in bad faith, and because they're the status quo of Twitter (as well as grooming normies into their sexual degeneracy via Frieren and Pragmata), they will almost always "win" arguments against antis (by winning, I mean ratioing their opponent, as in getting more likes and retweets than their opponent)
>>This is why anti-lolicon posts by trannies, furries, and leftists garner way more replies from lolicons, while anti-lolicon posts by right-wingers get little to no traction. To them, MAGAmutts are the only right-wingers you can criticise. If you dare criticise Braniggers for being porn-addicted shitskinned pedos, then you're a heckin leftist tranny!
>>The status quo of Twitter sucks. Branigger lolipedos aren't even "far-right" like leftists claim, they're milquetoast center-right at best.
№18636472[Quote]
that sounds keyed (the logical fallacies not the pedo part) salt import these people now.
№18636481[Quote]
>>>Something I have noticed about lolipedos is how they choose which arguments they decide to engage in or flat-out ignore.
>>>If Braniggers see any vulnerabilities in your argument or if they're able to abuse any logical fallacies, they might engage. But if your argument actually challenges and undermines their beliefs, they will pussy out and pretend as if they have never seen your post.
>>>They are cowards, parasites. They will argue in bad faith, and because they're the status quo of Twitter (as well as grooming normies into their sexual degeneracy via Frieren and Pragmata), they will almost always "win" arguments against antis (by winning, I mean ratioing their opponent, as in getting more likes and retweets than their opponent)
>>>This is why anti-lolicon posts by trannies, furries, and leftists garner way more replies from lolicons, while anti-lolicon posts by right-wingers get little to no traction. To them, MAGAmutts are the only right-wingers you can criticise. If you dare criticise Braniggers for being porn-addicted shitskinned pedos, then you're a heckin leftist tranny!
>>>The status quo of Twitter sucks. Branigger lolipedos aren't even "far-right" like leftists claim, they're milquetoast center-right at best.
№18636484[Quote]
File: IMG_0138.png 📥︎ (166.14 KB, 999x955) 8704d33a4a7c0d375a676da7b4d241a592d24b9cfe4bb11c546d97b16e44b8330ImgOps
>>>>Something I have noticed about lolipedos is how they choose which arguments they decide to engage in or flat-out ignore.
>>>>If Braniggers see any vulnerabilities in your argument or if they're able to abuse any logical fallacies, they might engage. But if your argument actually challenges and undermines their beliefs, they will pussy out and pretend as if they have never seen your post.
>>>>They are cowards, parasites. They will argue in bad faith, and because they're the status quo of Twitter (as well as grooming normies into their sexual degeneracy via Frieren and Pragmata), they will almost always "win" arguments against antis (by winning, I mean ratioing their opponent, as in getting more likes and retweets than their opponent)
>>>>This is why anti-lolicon posts by trannies, furries, and leftists garner way more replies from lolicons, while anti-lolicon posts by right-wingers get little to no traction. To them, MAGAmutts are the only right-wingers you can criticise. If you dare criticise Braniggers for being porn-addicted shitskinned pedos, then you're a heckin leftist tranny!
>>>>The status quo of Twitter sucks. Branigger lolipedos aren't even "far-right" like leftists claim, they're milquetoast center-right at best.
№18636503[Quote]
>>>>>Something I have noticed about lolipedos is how they choose which arguments they decide to engage in or flat-out ignore.
>>>>>If Braniggers see any vulnerabilities in your argument or if they're able to abuse any logical fallacies, they might engage. But if your argument actually challenges and undermines their beliefs, they will pussy out and pretend as if they have never seen your post.
>>>>>They are cowards, parasites. They will argue in bad faith, and because they're the status quo of Twitter (as well as grooming normies into their sexual degeneracy via Frieren and Pragmata), they will almost always "win" arguments against antis (by winning, I mean ratioing their opponent, as in getting more likes and retweets than their opponent)
>>>>>This is why anti-lolicon posts by trannies, furries, and leftists garner way more replies from lolicons, while anti-lolicon posts by right-wingers get little to no traction. To them, MAGAmutts are the only right-wingers you can criticise. If you dare criticise Braniggers for being porn-addicted shitskinned pedos, then you're a heckin leftist tranny!
>>>>>The status quo of Twitter sucks. Branigger lolipedos aren't even "far-right" like leftists claim, they're milquetoast center-right at best.
№18636536[Quote]
>>18636455no fucking way did fairyjaks survive long enough to see a htsm version get made
№18636551[Quote]
There is no objective set of morals
№18636558[Quote]
Blackwashing is bullshit anyway
№18636587[Quote]
>If Braniggers see any vulnerabilities in your argument or if they're able to abuse any logical fallacies, they might engage. But if your argument actually challenges and undermines their beliefs, they will pussy out and pretend as if they have never seen your post.
This is how normgroid NPCs act in general, though
№18636594[Quote]
lolicons love to cherrypick and project
№18636617[Quote]
>fuggen branoons r heckin' hippocripz ow sumfinit's because niggers suck, next question
>>18636536the first brown alicia nate was posted in the second half of 2023 i think, so a fairy variant would be par for the course
№18636618[Quote]
>>>>>>Something I have noticed about lolipedos is how they choose which arguments they decide to engage in or flat-out ignore.
>>>>>>If Braniggers see any vulnerabilities in your argument or if they're able to abuse any logical fallacies, they might engage. But if your argument actually challenges and undermines their beliefs, they will pussy out and pretend as if they have never seen your post.
>>>>>>They are cowards, parasites. They will argue in bad faith, and because they're the status quo of Twitter (as well as grooming normies into their sexual degeneracy via Frieren and Pragmata), they will almost always "win" arguments against antis (by winning, I mean ratioing their opponent, as in getting more likes and retweets than their opponent)
>>>>>>This is why anti-lolicon posts by trannies, furries, and leftists garner way more replies from lolicons, while anti-lolicon posts by right-wingers get little to no traction. To them, MAGAmutts are the only right-wingers you can criticise. If you dare criticise Braniggers for being porn-addicted shitskinned pedos, then you're a heckin leftist tranny!
>>>>>>The status quo of Twitter sucks. Branigger lolipedos aren't even "far-right" like leftists claim, they're milquetoast center-right at best.
№18636629[Quote]
>>18636617>it's because niggers suck, next questionMarge, Braniggers are usually Indian or Southeast Asian, not African.
№18636632[Quote]
>>>>>>>Something I have noticed about lolipedos is how they choose which arguments they decide to engage in or flat-out ignore.
>>>>>>>If Braniggers see any vulnerabilities in your argument or if they're able to abuse any logical fallacies, they might engage. But if your argument actually challenges and undermines their beliefs, they will pussy out and pretend as if they have never seen your post.
>>>>>>>They are cowards, parasites. They will argue in bad faith, and because they're the status quo of Twitter (as well as grooming normies into their sexual degeneracy via Frieren and Pragmata), they will almost always "win" arguments against antis (by winning, I mean ratioing their opponent, as in getting more likes and retweets than their opponent)
>>>>>>>This is why anti-lolicon posts by trannies, furries, and leftists garner way more replies from lolicons, while anti-lolicon posts by right-wingers get little to no traction. To them, MAGAmutts are the only right-wingers you can criticise. If you dare criticise Braniggers for being porn-addicted shitskinned pedos, then you're a heckin leftist tranny!
>>>>>>>The status quo of Twitter sucks. Branigger lolipedos aren't even "far-right" like leftists claim, they're milquetoast center-right at best.
№18636654[Quote]
>>>>>>>>Something I have noticed about lolipedos is how they choose which arguments they decide to engage in or flat-out ignore.
>>>>>>>>If Braniggers see any vulnerabilities in your argument or if they're able to abuse any logical fallacies, they might engage. But if your argument actually challenges and undermines their beliefs, they will pussy out and pretend as if they have never seen your post.
>>>>>>>>They are cowards, parasites. They will argue in bad faith, and because they're the status quo of Twitter (as well as grooming normies into their sexual degeneracy via Frieren and Pragmata), they will almost always "win" arguments against antis (by winning, I mean ratioing their opponent, as in getting more likes and retweets than their opponent)
>>>>>>>>This is why anti-lolicon posts by trannies, furries, and leftists garner way more replies from lolicons, while anti-lolicon posts by right-wingers get little to no traction. To them, MAGAmutts are the only right-wingers you can criticise. If you dare criticise Braniggers for being porn-addicted shitskinned pedos, then you're a heckin leftist tranny!
>>>>>>>>The status quo of Twitter sucks. Branigger lolipedos aren't even "far-right" like leftists claim, they're milquetoast center-right at best.
№18636676[Quote]
>>>>>>>>>Something I have noticed about lolipedos is how they choose which arguments they decide to engage in or flat-out ignore.
>>>>>>>>>If Braniggers see any vulnerabilities in your argument or if they're able to abuse any logical fallacies, they might engage. But if your argument actually challenges and undermines their beliefs, they will pussy out and pretend as if they have never seen your post.
>>>>>>>>>They are cowards, parasites. They will argue in bad faith, and because they're the status quo of Twitter (as well as grooming normies into their sexual degeneracy via Frieren and Pragmata), they will almost always "win" arguments against antis (by winning, I mean ratioing their opponent, as in getting more likes and retweets than their opponent)
>>>>>>>>>This is why anti-lolicon posts by trannies, furries, and leftists garner way more replies from lolicons, while anti-lolicon posts by right-wingers get little to no traction. To them, MAGAmutts are the only right-wingers you can criticise. If you dare criticise Braniggers for being porn-addicted shitskinned pedos, then you're a heckin leftist tranny!
>>>>>>>>>The status quo of Twitter sucks. Branigger lolipedos aren't even "far-right" like leftists claim, they're milquetoast center-right at best.
№18636688[Quote]
>>18636663In Bharat, cvnny is WQN
№18636767[Quote]
snca
№18636769[Quote]
Why do loliniggers always get startled by old western cartoons?
№18636783[Quote]
>>18636722i thought pedophilic gigas were not allowed
№18636818[Quote]
>>18636783That's not a pedophilic giga doe
№18637021[Quote]
>>>>>>>>>>Something I have noticed about lolipedos is how they choose which arguments they decide to engage in or flat-out ignore.
>>>>>>>>>>If Braniggers see any vulnerabilities in your argument or if they're able to abuse any logical fallacies, they might engage. But if your argument actually challenges and undermines their beliefs, they will pussy out and pretend as if they have never seen your post.
>>>>>>>>>>They are cowards, parasites. They will argue in bad faith, and because they're the status quo of Twitter (as well as grooming normies into their sexual degeneracy via Frieren and Pragmata), they will almost always "win" arguments against antis (by winning, I mean ratioing their opponent, as in getting more likes and retweets than their opponent)
>>>>>>>>>>This is why anti-lolicon posts by trannies, furries, and leftists garner way more replies from lolicons, while anti-lolicon posts by right-wingers get little to no traction. To them, MAGAmutts are the only right-wingers you can criticise. If you dare criticise Braniggers for being porn-addicted shitskinned pedos, then you're a heckin leftist tranny!
>>>>>>>>>>The status quo of Twitter sucks. Branigger lolipedos aren't even "far-right" like leftists claim, they're milquetoast center-right at best.
№18637051[Quote]
>>>>>>>>>>>Something I have noticed about lolipedos is how they choose which arguments they decide to engage in or flat-out ignore.
>>>>>>>>>>>If Braniggers see any vulnerabilities in your argument or if they're able to abuse any logical fallacies, they might engage. But if your argument actually challenges and undermines their beliefs, they will pussy out and pretend as if they have never seen your post.
>>>>>>>>>>>They are cowards, parasites. They will argue in bad faith, and because they're the status quo of Twitter (as well as grooming normies into their sexual degeneracy via Frieren and Pragmata), they will almost always "win" arguments against antis (by winning, I mean ratioing their opponent, as in getting more likes and retweets than their opponent)
>>>>>>>>>>>This is why anti-lolicon posts by trannies, furries, and leftists garner way more replies from lolicons, while anti-lolicon posts by right-wingers get little to no traction. To them, MAGAmutts are the only right-wingers you can criticise. If you dare criticise Braniggers for being porn-addicted shitskinned pedos, then you're a heckin leftist tranny!
>>>>>>>>>>>The status quo of Twitter sucks. Branigger lolipedos aren't even "far-right" like leftists claim, they're milquetoast center-right at best.
№18637067[Quote]
>>>>>>>>>>>Something I have noticed about lolipedos is how they choose which arguments they decide to engage in or flat-out ignore.
>>>>>>>>>>>If Braniggers see any vulnerabilities in your argument or if they're able to abuse any logical fallacies, they might engage. But if your argument actually challenges and undermines their beliefs, they will pussy out and pretend as if they have never seen your post.
>>>>>>>>>>>They are cowards, parasites. They will argue in bad faith, and because they're the status quo of Twitter (as well as grooming normies into their sexual degeneracy via Frieren and Pragmata), they will almost always "win" arguments against antis (by winning, I mean ratioing their opponent, as in getting more likes and retweets than their opponent)
>>>>>>>>>>>This is why anti-lolicon posts by trannies, furries, and leftists garner way more replies from lolicons, while anti-lolicon posts by right-wingers get little to no traction. To them, MAGAmutts are the only right-wingers you can criticise. If you dare criticise Braniggers for being porn-addicted shitskinned pedos, then you're a heckin leftist tranny!
>>>>>>>>>>>The status quo of Twitter sucks. Branigger lolipedos aren't even "far-right" like leftists claim, they're milquetoast center-right at best.
№18637129[Quote]
>>18637064How it feels doing hammer curls in the gym
№18637172[Quote]
>>18637064I'm not even gonna fall for this bait due to how utterly shit it is
№18637173[Quote]
>>18637158That really isn't a pedophilic giga doe. A pedophilia-promoting giga and a pedophilic giga are different things.
№18637189[Quote]
>>>>>>>>>>>>Something I have noticed about lolipedos is how they choose which arguments they decide to engage in or flat-out ignore.
>>>>>>>>>>>>If Braniggers see any vulnerabilities in your argument or if they're able to abuse any logical fallacies, they might engage. But if your argument actually challenges and undermines their beliefs, they will pussy out and pretend as if they have never seen your post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>They are cowards, parasites. They will argue in bad faith, and because they're the status quo of Twitter (as well as grooming normies into their sexual degeneracy via Frieren and Pragmata), they will almost always "win" arguments against antis (by winning, I mean ratioing their opponent, as in getting more likes and retweets than their opponent)
>>>>>>>>>>>>This is why anti-lolicon posts by trannies, furries, and leftists garner way more replies from lolicons, while anti-lolicon posts by right-wingers get little to no traction. To them, MAGAmutts are the only right-wingers you can criticise. If you dare criticise Braniggers for being porn-addicted shitskinned pedos, then you're a heckin leftist tranny!
>>>>>>>>>>>>The status quo of Twitter sucks. Branigger lolipedos aren't even "far-right" like leftists claim, they're milquetoast center-right at best.
№18637195[Quote]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Something I have noticed about lolipedos is how they choose which arguments they decide to engage in or flat-out ignore.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>If Braniggers see any vulnerabilities in your argument or if they're able to abuse any logical fallacies, they might engage. But if your argument actually challenges and undermines their beliefs, they will pussy out and pretend as if they have never seen your post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>They are cowards, parasites. They will argue in bad faith, and because they're the status quo of Twitter (as well as grooming normies into their sexual degeneracy via Frieren and Pragmata), they will almost always "win" arguments against antis (by winning, I mean ratioing their opponent, as in getting more likes and retweets than their opponent)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>This is why anti-lolicon posts by trannies, furries, and leftists garner way more replies from lolicons, while anti-lolicon posts by right-wingers get little to no traction. To them, MAGAmutts are the only right-wingers you can criticise. If you dare criticise Braniggers for being porn-addicted shitskinned pedos, then you're a heckin leftist tranny!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>The status quo of Twitter sucks. Branigger lolipedos aren't even "far-right" like leftists claim, they're milquetoast center-right at best.
№18637239[Quote]
File: 16067864.png 📥︎ (236.45 KB, 500x500) d1c8ef1e3e6d84307b6809d0c937f7c228af2660771e9ee0493cb04d7fa7825a0ImgOps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Something I have noticed about lolipedos is how they choose which arguments they decide to engage in or flat-out ignore.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If Braniggers see any vulnerabilities in your argument or if they're able to abuse any logical fallacies, they might engage. But if your argument actually challenges and undermines their beliefs, they will pussy out and pretend as if they have never seen your post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>They are cowards, parasites. They will argue in bad faith, and because they're the status quo of Twitter (as well as grooming normies into their sexual degeneracy via Frieren and Pragmata), they will almost always "win" arguments against antis (by winning, I mean ratioing their opponent, as in getting more likes and retweets than their opponent)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>This is why anti-lolicon posts by trannies, furries, and leftists garner way more replies from lolicons, while anti-lolicon posts by right-wingers get little to no traction. To them, MAGAmutts are the only right-wingers you can criticise. If you dare criticise Braniggers for being porn-addicted shitskinned pedos, then you're a heckin leftist tranny!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The status quo of Twitter sucks. Branigger lolipedos aren't even "far-right" like leftists claim, they're milquetoast center-right at best.
№18637244[Quote]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Something I have noticed about lolipedos is how they choose which arguments they decide to engage in or flat-out ignore.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If Braniggers see any vulnerabilities in your argument or if they're able to abuse any logical fallacies, they might engage. But if your argument actually challenges and undermines their beliefs, they will pussy out and pretend as if they have never seen your post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>They are cowards, parasites. They will argue in bad faith, and because they're the status quo of Twitter (as well as grooming normies into their sexual degeneracy via Frieren and Pragmata), they will almost always "win" arguments against antis (by winning, I mean ratioing their opponent, as in getting more likes and retweets than their opponent)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>This is why anti-lolicon posts by trannies, furries, and leftists garner way more replies from lolicons, while anti-lolicon posts by right-wingers get little to no traction. To them, MAGAmutts are the only right-wingers you can criticise. If you dare criticise Braniggers for being porn-addicted shitskinned pedos, then you're a heckin leftist tranny!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The status quo of Twitter sucks. Branigger lolipedos aren't even "far-right" like leftists claim, they're milquetoast center-right at best.
№18637247[Quote]
>>18637239>>18637195>>18637189>>18637244Why are people quoting each other as yellow dogs staring at computers?
№18637253[Quote]
File: bharat win.png 📥︎ (730.8 KB, 1735x1748) 2532528d857256adc9546ddb9ae42f1c72c30c3eb1bdfa467cd14f5b91b402e40ImgOps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Something I have noticed about lolipedos is how they choose which arguments they decide to engage in or flat-out ignore.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If Braniggers see any vulnerabilities in your argument or if they're able to abuse any logical fallacies, they might engage. But if your argument actually challenges and undermines their beliefs, they will pussy out and pretend as if they have never seen your post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>They are cowards, parasites. They will argue in bad faith, and because they're the status quo of Twitter (as well as grooming normies into their sexual degeneracy via Frieren and Pragmata), they will almost always "win" arguments against antis (by winning, I mean ratioing their opponent, as in getting more likes and retweets than their opponent)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>This is why anti-lolicon posts by trannies, furries, and leftists garner way more replies from lolicons, while anti-lolicon posts by right-wingers get little to no traction. To them, MAGAmutts are the only right-wingers you can criticise. If you dare criticise Braniggers for being porn-addicted shitskinned pedos, then you're a heckin leftist tranny!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The status quo of Twitter sucks. Branigger lolipedos aren't even "far-right" like leftists claim, they're milquetoast center-right at best.
№18637263[Quote]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Something I have noticed about lolipedos is how they choose which arguments they decide to engage in or flat-out ignore.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If Braniggers see any vulnerabilities in your argument or if they're able to abuse any logical fallacies, they might engage. But if your argument actually challenges and undermines their beliefs, they will pussy out and pretend as if they have never seen your post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>They are cowards, parasites. They will argue in bad faith, and because they're the status quo of Twitter (as well as grooming normies into their sexual degeneracy via Frieren and Pragmata), they will almost always "win" arguments against antis (by winning, I mean ratioing their opponent, as in getting more likes and retweets than their opponent)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>This is why anti-lolicon posts by trannies, furries, and leftists garner way more replies from lolicons, while anti-lolicon posts by right-wingers get little to no traction. To them, MAGAmutts are the only right-wingers you can criticise. If you dare criticise Braniggers for being porn-addicted shitskinned pedos, then you're a heckin leftist tranny!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The status quo of Twitter sucks. Branigger lolipedos aren't even "far-right" like leftists claim, they're milquetoast center-right at best.
№18637278[Quote]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Something I have noticed about lolipedos is how they choose which arguments they decide to engage in or flat-out ignore.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If Braniggers see any vulnerabilities in your argument or if they're able to abuse any logical fallacies, they might engage. But if your argument actually challenges and undermines their beliefs, they will pussy out and pretend as if they have never seen your post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>They are cowards, parasites. They will argue in bad faith, and because they're the status quo of Twitter (as well as grooming normies into their sexual degeneracy via Frieren and Pragmata), they will almost always "win" arguments against antis (by winning, I mean ratioing their opponent, as in getting more likes and retweets than their opponent)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>This is why anti-lolicon posts by trannies, furries, and leftists garner way more replies from lolicons, while anti-lolicon posts by right-wingers get little to no traction. To them, MAGAmutts are the only right-wingers you can criticise. If you dare criticise Braniggers for being porn-addicted shitskinned pedos, then you're a heckin leftist tranny!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The status quo of Twitter sucks. Branigger lolipedos aren't even "far-right" like leftists claim, they're milquetoast center-right at best.
№18637284[Quote]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Something I have noticed about lolipedos is how they choose which arguments they decide to engage in or flat-out ignore.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If Braniggers see any vulnerabilities in your argument or if they're able to abuse any logical fallacies, they might engage. But if your argument actually challenges and undermines their beliefs, they will pussy out and pretend as if they have never seen your post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>They are cowards, parasites. They will argue in bad faith, and because they're the status quo of Twitter (as well as grooming normies into their sexual degeneracy via Frieren and Pragmata), they will almost always "win" arguments against antis (by winning, I mean ratioing their opponent, as in getting more likes and retweets than their opponent)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>This is why anti-lolicon posts by trannies, furries, and leftists garner way more replies from lolicons, while anti-lolicon posts by right-wingers get little to no traction. To them, MAGAmutts are the only right-wingers you can criticise. If you dare criticise Braniggers for being porn-addicted shitskinned pedos, then you're a heckin leftist tranny!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The status quo of Twitter sucks. Branigger lolipedos aren't even "far-right" like leftists claim, they're milquetoast center-right at best.
№18637306[Quote]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Something I have noticed about lolipedos is how they choose which arguments they decide to engage in or flat-out ignore.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If Braniggers see any vulnerabilities in your argument or if they're able to abuse any logical fallacies, they might engage. But if your argument actually challenges and undermines their beliefs, they will pussy out and pretend as if they have never seen your post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>They are cowards, parasites. They will argue in bad faith, and because they're the status quo of Twitter (as well as grooming normies into their sexual degeneracy via Frieren and Pragmata), they will almost always "win" arguments against antis (by winning, I mean ratioing their opponent, as in getting more likes and retweets than their opponent)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>This is why anti-lolicon posts by trannies, furries, and leftists garner way more replies from lolicons, while anti-lolicon posts by right-wingers get little to no traction. To them, MAGAmutts are the only right-wingers you can criticise. If you dare criticise Braniggers for being porn-addicted shitskinned pedos, then you're a heckin leftist tranny!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The status quo of Twitter sucks. Branigger lolipedos aren't even "far-right" like leftists claim, they're milquetoast center-right at best.
№18637324[Quote]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Something I have noticed about lolipedos is how they choose which arguments they decide to engage in or flat-out ignore.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If Braniggers see any vulnerabilities in your argument or if they're able to abuse any logical fallacies, they might engage. But if your argument actually challenges and undermines their beliefs, they will pussy out and pretend as if they have never seen your post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>They are cowards, parasites. They will argue in bad faith, and because they're the status quo of Twitter (as well as grooming normies into their sexual degeneracy via Frieren and Pragmata), they will almost always "win" arguments against antis (by winning, I mean ratioing their opponent, as in getting more likes and retweets than their opponent)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>This is why anti-lolicon posts by trannies, furries, and leftists garner way more replies from lolicons, while anti-lolicon posts by right-wingers get little to no traction. To them, MAGAmutts are the only right-wingers you can criticise. If you dare criticise Braniggers for being porn-addicted shitskinned pedos, then you're a heckin leftist tranny!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The status quo of Twitter sucks. Branigger lolipedos aren't even "far-right" like leftists claim, they're milquetoast center-right at best.
№18637334[Quote]
File: BharatARYAN.png 📥︎ (150.9 KB, 1233x1580) 32cc6db3c61b398e3264901d6db3cd999346326c918d67b3d91da3e296664c9d0ImgOps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Something I have noticed about lolipedos is how they choose which arguments they decide to engage in or flat-out ignore.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If Braniggers see any vulnerabilities in your argument or if they're able to abuse any logical fallacies, they might engage. But if your argument actually challenges and undermines their beliefs, they will pussy out and pretend as if they have never seen your post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>They are cowards, parasites. They will argue in bad faith, and because they're the status quo of Twitter (as well as grooming normies into their sexual degeneracy via Frieren and Pragmata), they will almost always "win" arguments against antis (by winning, I mean ratioing their opponent, as in getting more likes and retweets than their opponent)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>This is why anti-lolicon posts by trannies, furries, and leftists garner way more replies from lolicons, while anti-lolicon posts by right-wingers get little to no traction. To them, MAGAmutts are the only right-wingers you can criticise. If you dare criticise Braniggers for being porn-addicted shitskinned pedos, then you're a heckin leftist tranny!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The status quo of Twitter sucks. Branigger lolipedos aren't even "far-right" like leftists claim, they're milquetoast center-right at best.
№18637344[Quote]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Something I have noticed about lolipedos is how they choose which arguments they decide to engage in or flat-out ignore.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If Braniggers see any vulnerabilities in your argument or if they're able to abuse any logical fallacies, they might engage. But if your argument actually challenges and undermines their beliefs, they will pussy out and pretend as if they have never seen your post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>They are cowards, parasites. They will argue in bad faith, and because they're the status quo of Twitter (as well as grooming normies into their sexual degeneracy via Frieren and Pragmata), they will almost always "win" arguments against antis (by winning, I mean ratioing their opponent, as in getting more likes and retweets than their opponent)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>This is why anti-lolicon posts by trannies, furries, and leftists garner way more replies from lolicons, while anti-lolicon posts by right-wingers get little to no traction. To them, MAGAmutts are the only right-wingers you can criticise. If you dare criticise Braniggers for being porn-addicted shitskinned pedos, then you're a heckin leftist tranny!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The status quo of Twitter sucks. Branigger lolipedos aren't even "far-right" like leftists claim, they're milquetoast center-right at best.
№18637347[Quote]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Something I have noticed about lolipedos is how they choose which arguments they decide to engage in or flat-out ignore.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If Braniggers see any vulnerabilities in your argument or if they're able to abuse any logical fallacies, they might engage. But if your argument actually challenges and undermines their beliefs, they will pussy out and pretend as if they have never seen your post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>They are cowards, parasites. They will argue in bad faith, and because they're the status quo of Twitter (as well as grooming normies into their sexual degeneracy via Frieren and Pragmata), they will almost always "win" arguments against antis (by winning, I mean ratioing their opponent, as in getting more likes and retweets than their opponent)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>This is why anti-lolicon posts by trannies, furries, and leftists garner way more replies from lolicons, while anti-lolicon posts by right-wingers get little to no traction. To them, MAGAmutts are the only right-wingers you can criticise. If you dare criticise Braniggers for being porn-addicted shitskinned pedos, then you're a heckin leftist tranny!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>The status quo of Twitter sucks. Branigger lolipedos aren't even "far-right" like leftists claim, they're milquetoast center-right at best.