/soy/ - Soyjaks

>charles darwin lover
<nietzsche lover
What surprises me most when I look at the wide variety of the destinies of man is that I always see the opposite of that which Darwin and his followers see, or want me to see today, which is selection in favor of the stronger, better-constituted, and the progress of the human specie

the opposite is actually evident and distinguishable, the elimination of the lucky strokes, the uselessness of the more highly developed types, the inevitable domination of the average and the even the sub-average types

If we are not shown why man should bean exception among creatures, I incline to the bias and tendancy that Darwin has been confused everywhere

Nietzsches theory of will to power in which I recognize is the ultimate ground and character of all change provides us with the reason why selection is not in favor of the exceptions and strong, the strongest and most fortunate are weak when opposed by organized more populated herd instinct

there is nothing in the world more interesting than this unwelcome spectace where the highest types of men are seen by the majority as undesirable

That the theory of Darwin that the higher organisms have evolved from the lower has not been demonstrated in a single case. I see how the lower dominate through their numbers, their intelligence but i do not see how an accidental exception gives an advantage, at least not for such a long period; why should a accidental change grow so strong would be something else of needing explanation

in terms of nature, she is cruel towards her children of fortune, she spares and protects and loves the less fortunate, the subhuman types