№18532231[Quote]
cus it was le aristocratic giga state. most white nationalists actually hate it for that reason cus they're obsessed with "the working white man". so it wasn't an ethnostate. instead it had ultra rich white minority using niggas as slave labor and i think thats so much more impressive and giga than an all-white state where whites are businessmen but also petty janitors
№18532237[Quote]
a bunch of white ppl got gunned down and genocided by nigs is what they were upset about
№18532239[Quote]
>>18532231Rhodesia was a shithole even worse than the modern state, maybe the 0.001% of whites and africans who lived there had a superior life to the modern man from zimbabwe
№18532241[Quote]
>>18532237“Genocide” is a strong word to use here
№18532252[Quote]
>>18532231The thing with slave labour is that it isn’t a good thing to do
№18532255[Quote]
>>18532239yeah thats my point dumbass nigga. the 5% whites had giga ultra good standard of living because the average nigger was basically a slave. it was a shithole for everyone except whites. like how ancient greece was also a shithole for snca people. yet we all know it was a giga place to live
№18532260[Quote]
>>18532255Sadly its now just a shithole for everyone
№18532265[Quote]
>>18532260There is the 1% ruling class who in every country have it great
№18532266[Quote]
>>18532265That's sadly even worse than rhodie cucks
№18532267[Quote]
>>18532255I still don’t see the point in worshipping basically living off dat EBT
№18532273[Quote]
>>18532266They probably have better off, plus Zimbabwe was alright before the inflation crisis of the 80’s
№18532275[Quote]
>>18532252yes it is
there's higher life and lower life
you can "teach" a nigger to be an educated lawyer or physician or philosopher or artist. but that wouldn't be teaching, it would be drilling. like in military drills
why make lower life do anything other than lower labor when you can give the higher opportunities of life to specimens who can actually accomplish it by their innate strength and intelligence? the aristocratic state is just an objectively superior allocation of resources.
№18532279[Quote]
>>18532273They don't statistically they just don't, I agree with the zimbabwe before the 80s but modern zimbabwe is a shithole and is known as one for a reason
№18532284[Quote]
>>18532275theres a reason why slavery isn’t in place in most states today, because the economics of it is trash
№18532290[Quote]
>>18532279rhodesia was a 1950’s slave state, Zimbabwe is just your modern african shithole.
№18532293[Quote]
>>18532290No it wasn't, it was an apartheid state, which makes it all the more embarrassing that blacks lives hardly changed since then
№18532297[Quote]
>>18532293Blacks now have way more than what they did before
№18532302[Quote]
>>18532297They don't inflation says otherwise and so does their corrupt government
№18532307[Quote]
>>18532293it basically was a slave state doe. whites were 5% of the population and held 99% of the voting power. they also had all the wealth and blacks were so poor that they could never save up to exit their massa's plantations.
№18532310[Quote]
>>18532302Inflation ended 30 years ago and the government is as corrupt as rhodesia
№18532312[Quote]
>>18532310The government is still horribly corrupt and it went from everyone in zimbabwe being a quadrillionaire to just a trillionaire or millionaire
№18532314[Quote]
>>18532307The difference between jim crow esque laws and actual bondage is massive
№18532322[Quote]
>>18532314rhodesia was veeeeeeeeery different from jim crow. cus USA racism was made to protect the white working class. whereas rhodesia was unique in that the white population was so small that the vast majority of whites were in the wealthy/ruling class. so rhodesian racism was used to keep the black working class as a slave to the state and thus to the whites.
ofc it wasnt official legal slavery but blacks in rhodesia were basically the state's servants and had the choice of being in crippling poverty or serving the white order
№18532330[Quote]
>>18532284Slavery is in place in every state that exists today
№18532331[Quote]
>>18532322All of what you described was common under jim crow, keeping the playing field uneven against blacks and having them in literal bondage are two massively separate things
№18532335[Quote]
>>18532330Not in the sense of typical 'unjustified' chattel slavery, which is what i meant
№18532340[Quote]
>>18532331u dont get it doe. there was no need to level the playing field in rhodesia because whites & blacks weren't on the same playing field in the first place. if you were white, you weren't working class. period
№18532348[Quote]
>>18532335Stop trolling that isnt what you meant
№18532349[Quote]
>>18532340Whites and blacks werent on the same level playing field in America either? The poorest white still had more rights then the richest nigger. You don't understand that not being able to vote and being chained against your wall are two separate things
№18532353[Quote]
>>18532349Why are you arguing I dont get it
№18532356[Quote]
>>18532348The economics of chattle slavery is retarded, you have to pay for their housing, food, etc, it's literally easier to pay your wagecucks 3 cents a year then it is to do all that
№18532358[Quote]
>>18532353That apartheid is not a slave state
№18532364[Quote]
>>18532358Why does the difference matter
№18532366[Quote]
>>18532356That sounds genius
№18532367[Quote]
>>18532364You seemed pretty vindictive about rhodesia being a slave state, you tell me
№18532372[Quote]
>>18532367It was a slave state doe
№18532374[Quote]
>>18532372Where were the bondage laws?
№18532384[Quote]
>>18532349idk man maybe we're talking about different things. but rhodesian blacks had to be workers cus of economic reasons. and the state itself made sure to take away citizenships by making up fake countries and so on to reduce their rights to bargain. all of this so the whites, who had a shit ton of money, could get blacks working on their farms, as domestic workers, and so on.
you give the example of 'poorest white vs richest nigger' but the state itself in rhodesia made sure that blacks never got any money to keep them in economic slavery and so on. whereas US blacks were still citizens and so on.
my main point is basically that in the USA the race warfare is white working class vs black working class, fighting for employment and benefits. whereas in rhodesia the race warfare is white ruling class vs black working class. there's wayyyyyyyy less white workers in rhodesia which makes it a very different situation to the USA.
№18532395[Quote]
>>18532374i don't think you have to call it slavery for it to basically be slavery
the same way chink factory workers are basically slave cus the state systematically impoverishes them to make their bargaining power weaker to keep them enchained
№18532398[Quote]
>>18532395Hes a retard who likes to worship the law, probably doesnt cross the street without checking first
№18532400[Quote]
>>18532395I do not entirely disagree, but to call China, Rhodesia, or 1950's America a slave state is to diminish actual slavery like what you saw in 1800s America, or the Barbary coast. It's nowhere near comparable
№18532424[Quote]
>>18532410Why are you so afraid of breaking the law