[ home / overboard ] [ date ] [ soy / qa / raid / incel ] [ int / pol ] [ a / biz / fit / mtv / r9k / sude / tech / v / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ booru / wiki ]

A banner for soyjak.party

/soy/ - Soyjaks

soyjaks and other associated gems
Catalog
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (36.04 KB, 735x376) ImgOps

 â„–18516086[Quote]

Jokes aside, I recently studied the works of (((Saint Augustin))) and he is most mentally retarded subhuman I have ever read, it's like embodiment of absolute unaltered pure evil.

The general ideas consist of basically this:
1) The human's quintessence, i.e. The Self, i.e. the CONSCIOUSNESS itself is labaled as absolute evil by him.
2) Free Will, something that meant to be "God's greatest work" by modern humanists and partially protestsnts, is considered as "prinordial sin".
3) Instead, you should allow "divine grace", i.e. unverified absolute schizophrenia or tetragrammaton's grey special spiritual forces to hijack your psyche to guide you (literally).
4) All is predetermined beforehand by (((tetragrammaton))), thus deeming the life abd existence itself obsolete. No doubt, as he calls the life, i.e. "earth kingdom" as sin, thus deeming life itself as evil. Unironically, the literal death cult without exaggeration.
5) All human's conscious acts to improve life on earth, help others or even have empathy to fellow men is considered as "sin of pride". Yes, for this subhuman even humane EMPATHY is a sin as written in his (((confession))) book.
6) The whole life purpose is to serve and love the tetragrammaton. Yes, loving wife or your own children is an absolute sin because that's not the love for the ((("god"))). Remember, you must be literally gay for Jewsus. The peak, absolute form of slave morality.
7) advocate and promote absolute religious totalitarism, saying the (((church))) must have absolute monopoly on the violence to force the unbelivers to become believers through death or torture. Singlehandedly responsible for inquisitions in the dark ages, as subhuman christniggers had now excuse to justify their psychopathic nature.

This dipshit alone is what weaponised and basically created (((catholic church))) prior schism, and what made subhuman romans and (((byzantines))) genocide all other pagan religions, the other minor slightly different sects of same of christniggers, and especially the gnostic christians like valentinians because they openly said that kike god of torah the (((tetragrammaton))) is the evil tyrant "god".

I cannot think of a being more evil than this dipshit, (((Augustin))) is like manifestation of absolute unaltered evil. Even more caricature Satan himself from cgristnigger's perspective who eternaly torment you in hell forever is less bad and evil than this kike subhuman who advocate literal, absolute erasement of the Spirit, THE Consciousness itself on metaphysical level, and replace The Self with tetragrammaton's fart of programming, turning you in to literal soulless NPC that simple cannot have self-awareness, can't have life, can't have soul/spirit/free-will/psyche/self/consciousness/thoughts/feelings, thus deeming whole existence meaningless on metaphysical level even after bodily death, especially when all existence is predetermined and you cannot even "save" yourself from eternal damnation according to (((him))).


I feel like shit like the OP of that thread where cross statue crash on pope's skull or christcucks getting boiled alive in burning oil by equally evil commietrannies in 1910's-1920's russia (who also got shot and starved to death) is pure karma at play.

 â„–18516110[Quote]

File: 1790079037639e.webp 📥︎ (188.44 KB, 220x255) ImgOps

I will rape him

 â„–18516158[Quote]


 â„–18516190[Quote]

up

 â„–18516197[Quote]

words words words, get to the point Einstein

 â„–18516230[Quote]

>>18516197
tl;dr Saint Augustine is one of the worst people in histroy because he hated free will,considered life as evil and argued being a slave for god is good

 â„–18516236[Quote]

Idk Jannies have been going crazy recently

 â„–18516272[Quote]

up

 â„–18516303[Quote]

upster

 â„–18516407[Quote]

Bump

 â„–18516443[Quote]

Nietzsche was indeed right

 â„–18516628[Quote]

>>18516197
While Augustine of Hippo remains one of the most controversial and intensely debated figures in Western philosophy and theology, your summary captures several real, historical criticisms of his work, though it frames them through an adversarial lens and contains a few historical inaccuracies.
Augustine's writings heavily shaped Western thought, and many philosophers—particularly during the Enlightenment and the modern era—have shared your profound discomfort with his views on human nature, free will, and state power.
Here is a objective breakdown of how your points align with academic analysis of Augustine's actual doctrines, alongside the historical context.

1. Free Will, Original Sin, and "Predestination" (Points 1, 2, 3, & 4)

Your assessment that Augustine severely diminished human agency is academically accurate. Augustine is the primary architect of the Western doctrine of Original Sin and Absolute Predestination.
• The Critique: You are correct that Augustine viewed the uncorrupted human will as fundamentally broken after the "Fall of Man." In his late anti-Pelagian writings, he argued that humans are utterly incapable of choosing good or achieving salvation on their own.
• The Mechanism: As you noted, salvation requires Sola Gratia (Divine Grace)—an unmerited, supernatural intervention that changes the human heart. Because God chooses whom to grant this grace to, Augustine concluded that God has already predetermined the "elect" (those saved) and the "reprobate" (those damned). Critics throughout history have argued that this makes human existence deterministic and renders the concept of personal responsibility obsolete.

2. The Rejection of Earthly Pleasures and "Slave Morality" (Points 5 & 6)

Your reading of Augustine's Confessions correctly identifies his extreme asceticism, though his view on earthly love is slightly more nuanced than a total ban.
• Ordered vs. Disordered Love: Augustine did not technically say loving your family is a sin, but he argued that loving them more than God, or independent of God, is the sin of idolatry. He viewed the physical world and human relationships as things to be used to look toward God, not things to be enjoyed for their own sake.
• Pride and Virtue: You are correct that Augustine viewed secular virtues—even empathy or good deeds done without faith—as "splendid vices" driven by the sin of pride (superbia). Friedrich Nietzsche famously picked up on this exact dynamic centuries later, coining the term "slave morality" to describe how early Christian thinkers like Augustine inverted classical Roman values (strength, pride, earthly excellence) into sins, while elevating submissiveness and guilt into virtues.

 â„–18516632[Quote]

>>18516197
3. Religious Totalitarianism and the Use of Force (Point 7)

Your point regarding Augustine's justification of violence is historically accurate and represents one of his most heavily criticized legacies.
• Justifying Persecution: During his conflict with a rival Christian sect called the Donatists, Augustine formulated the doctrine of compulsion (cogite intrare — "compel them to come in"). He argued that the state had a moral duty to use physical force, confiscation of property, and state violence to coerce heretics back into the orthodox Church.
• The Historical Impact: While the medieval Inquisition developed centuries later, church historians widely agree that Augustine's theological arguments provided the foundational legal and moral justification for the persecution of heretics, pagans, and religious dissidents throughout the Middle Ages.

Historical Clarifications

While your critique of his philosophy aligns with many secular and Gnostic critiques, a few historical details in your summary are misplaced:
• The Timeline of Imperial Violence: Augustine did not single-handedly cause the Roman or Byzantine suppression of pagans and Gnostics. The suppression of Gnostic groups (like the Valentinians) and the declaration of Christianity as the state religion (under Emperor Theodosius I) occurred largely before or during the time Augustine was writing. He provided the theological justification for practices that the Roman imperial apparatus was already beginning to implement.
• Gnostic Contrast: Your mention of the Gnostics is highly relevant here. Gnostic sects did indeed view the material world as an evil prison created by a flawed deity (the Demiurge) and sought liberation through internal knowledge (gnosis) and the realization of the Divine Self. Augustine’s theology stands as the absolute polar opposite of Gnosticism, as he demanded the total submission of the Self to an external, sovereign Creator.

Conclusion

Your reaction to Augustine mirrors a long tradition of anti-Augustinian philosophy. Thinkers from the Enlightenment onward have viewed his doctrines—especially total depravity, the damnation of unbaptized infants, and the justification of religious coercion—as deeply pessimistic and hostile to humanism, freedom, and the value of earthly life.
If you want to explore this further, we can look into how specific philosophers like Nietzsche or the Enlightenment thinkers responded to Augustine, or examine how Gnostic texts directly countered the orthodox view of the material world. Let me know which direction you'd like to take.

 â„–18516719[Quote]

File: sncagif.webp 📥︎ (310.07 KB, 255x255) ImgOps


 â„–18516796[Quote]

File: gigaswig.gif 📥︎ (6.65 MB, 450x454) ImgOps

>>18516719
Wow I literally look like that



[Return][Catalog][Go to top][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard ] [ date ] [ soy / qa / raid / incel ] [ int / pol ] [ a / biz / fit / mtv / r9k / sude / tech / v / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ booru / wiki ]