>Wow. I can feel the butthurt all the way from here OP.>But I'm always up for a good science debate. How about this: If you (or anyone) can find me a peer-reviewed white paper from a recognized science journal factually stating that your stake (or any

Email
Subject
Comment
Verification	Please type the name of the object/variant:
File
Embed
Voice
Poll
Password	(For file deletion.)

Chud 10/17/26 (Sat) 06:11:54 №18496253 [Quote]

>Wow. I can feel the butthurt all the way from here OP.

>But I'm always up for a good science debate. How about this: If you (or anyone) can find me a peer-reviewed white paper from a recognized science journal factually stating that your stake (or any stake that is not well done) is "perfect" (or even just objectively superior) I will swear off well-done steaks forever and never eat one again. One caveat tho, it can't be about nutrition. Heating things too much destroys some nutrients in any organic material. Besides, I don't eat steak for the nutritional content.

Chud 10/17/26 (Sat) 06:16:57 №18496278 [Quote]

>>18496253 (OP)

Was this from the post on reddit?
What a dumbass, how could having more nutrients to your steak not be superior to a burnt well done piece of charcoal, it's more than just subjectiveness, one is objectively more satiating and healthy than the other