â„–18467672[Quote]
but the strict male and female create division too
Just look at all the incels and feminists
What we need to do is focus more on the role you play in the relationship
Do you play the passive traditionally feminine role or the active traditionally masculine role?
Thats all that is needed for love atleast
â„–18467692[Quote]
i honestly agree
didnt goatis say something similar to this?
â„–18467741[Quote]
>>18467692Idk, i just had this stuck in my mind and needed to post it.
â„–18467747[Quote]
Emailfags need to be stopped!
â„–18467756[Quote]
nigga why do you have your email out
â„–18467763[Quote]
jeevacation@gmail.com
â„–18467767[Quote]
>>18467763nusois really think you need an email to post, geg.
â„–18467769[Quote]
geg, its epsneeds email
â„–18467772[Quote]
>>18467770I just realised
â„–18467773[Quote]
>>18467756nusoi… i'm glad that isn't my real mail
â„–18467804[Quote]
Not to mention John Money was a groomer pedo who coined the terms gender role and sexual orientation
â„–18467821[Quote]
sorry meant to bump
â„–18467931[Quote]
Yes
â„–18467936[Quote]
There will be no sexual dimorphism in 2100, we will be like chinks
â„–18467946[Quote]
its true gender is a social construct, but completely abolishing to "make things fairer" would go against our human nature of being intrinsically hierarchical and we would find another way to reinvent gender
â„–18468001[Quote]
good take to be honest
â„–18468029[Quote]
Everyone having traditional gender roles was completely fine though
â„–18468161[Quote]
>>18467946In that case, society must be disciplined to fully prevent the concept behind gender from ever re-emerging again.