â„–18409051[Quote]
This was mean't more for Salt but anybaldi could reply with their thoughts
â„–18409060[Quote]
Integrity js isn't datamining if the rest of internet has its own equivalent
â„–18409070[Quote]
only for the hostiler parts
make it case by case
integrity is fine but still datamining
it's alright but i didn't expect it to make past like summer 2024
â„–18409072[Quote]
>>18409060integrity goes WAAAYYYY further than most normgroid sites.
â„–18409092[Quote]
yes
yes
Keep as is.
neutral
â„–18409095[Quote]
Even dubs
â„–18409101[Quote]
>>18409072most normgroid sites? like snca forums? big tech sites absolutely do everything in their power to track you
â„–18409137[Quote]
>rule 3
only for hostile shit
>stricten rules
it's tolerable however i would ban map flags
>integrity
more relaxed yeah i hope
>swinny
i like it but its a dnb sadly
i would like bait (and even maybe metawhining) posts deleted also what do you guys think
â„–18409141[Quote]
>>18409101Discord, Youtube, Twitter, and etc. Yes they do probably about as hard as integrity.js. It's the same type of stuff they do. Any regular site doesn't have that. Even big forums like ones for linux distros.
â„–18409183[Quote]
>>18409137not bait, how do you classify whats bait and whats not? this if its not obvious bait which the blame is on the nusoi who keeps on falling for it
â„–18409191[Quote]
Swinny is good but has to little PPH for my liking. Also they are pretty arrogant.
â„–18409232[Quote]
>>18409183i would do it gradually but for example that boy tummy shit thread i derailed… yeah i would delete that shit starting with most obvious
â„–18409255[Quote]
rules should be stricter yeah but anyb posting vantablack pedo content should js be ignored as a rule of thumb to not bring attention to retards
â„–18409458[Quote]
>Would you bring back Rule 3?
no.
>Would you stricten the rules on pedophillic jokes?
no.
>Would you relax integrity.js or open source it?
i would remove it.
>What do you think of the Swinny?
dead gay board
â„–18409482[Quote]
>Would you bring back Rule 3?
yes for sure
>Would you stricten the rules on pedophillic jokes?
ban the MAP flag shit
>Would you relax integrity.js or open source it?
remove it
>What do you think of the Swinny?
decent site
â„–18409516[Quote]
>Would you bring back Rule 3?
yes
>Would you stricten the rules on pedophillic jokes?
yes ban OGD
>Would you relax integrity.js or open source it?
relax it
>What do you think of the Swinny?
pretty good but dnb and also i disagree with some parts of the coal list
â„–18409536[Quote]
>Would you bring back Rule 3?
no but they should still ban failtroll uttpedos
>Would you stricten the rules on pedophillic jokes?
a bit
>Would you relax integrity.js or open source it?
NO
>What do you think of the Swinny?
i never cared for the swinny
â„–18409550[Quote]
Yes
Yes
I'm not autistic enough to get this
Coal
â„–18409557[Quote]
>>18409550integrity is datamining
â„–18409566[Quote]
>Would you bring back Rule 3?
No
>Would you stricten the rules on pedophillic jokes?
No
>Would you relax integrity.js or open source it?
Yes
>What do you think of the Swinny?
Gay
â„–18409585[Quote]
Would you bring back Rule 3?
Eh I think people should be banned from trading 'cords or saying they're from groups like 764 cause that's just admitting to pedophilia. Unless the post seems like an obvious joke. UTTP isn't as bad cause a lot of the ones who raid us seem to be from their anti-pedo factions.
Would you stricten the rules on pedophillic jokes?
Nah. If I would then not my much.
Would you relax integrity.js or open source it?
I hate that shit delete it or cut it down a lot. Constantly misfires and stops me from posting.
What do you think of the Swinny?
Don't like it.
â„–18409591[Quote]
>>18409044 (OP)no, maybe yes if i wanted all of the coal to go away but that'd be tyranny
yes
remove it entirely, ban evading is sharty kulcher
dead website
â„–18409628[Quote]
>Would you bring back Rule 3?
yes but relaxed
>Would you stricten the rules on pedophillic jokes?
OGD is allowed only if its funny same with doctoddlering
>Would you relax integrity.js or open source it?
remove dataming and ban vpns
>What do you think of the Swinny?
rulecucks
â„–18409653[Quote]
>Would you bring back Rule 3?
probably not. I'd probably enforce it to some capacity (i.e. banning soycord trannies) but overall it's not worth having as a fullblown rule. you can remove shit without having specific rules against it.
>Would you stricten the rules on pedophillic jokes?
no. the rules are fine as is, jannies just need to pay more attention sometimes.
>Would you relax integrity.js or open source it?
probably remove it outright, who needs that shit?
>What do you think of the Swinny?
rulecucked coal. I'm glad it provides molestation victims with a place to cope but I have little interest in their site and wish they would stop shilling it so hard here.
â„–18409684[Quote]
>>18409653I've never seen the swinny shilled here outside of false flag stuff
â„–18409704[Quote]
>>18409684I consider every instance of "BEST OF SALT" to be a subtle swinny shilling tactic because that's absolutely what it's intended to be
â„–18409711[Quote]
>>18409704No i think its just regular admin obsession
â„–18409715[Quote]
>>18409653>no. the rules are fine as is, jannies just need to pay more attention sometimes. Jannies are the ones who participate in the pedoquoting geg
â„–18409732[Quote]
>>18409684The guy in this thread
>>18406778 (OP) (who I think is also the OP of the thread we're in) was directly shilling it
â„–18409738[Quote]
>>18409733I mean this one has the swinny logo on it geg
â„–18409801[Quote]
>>18409715pedoquoting is fine. what I mean is that they need to pay attention to catch actual pedos abusing it. like, there were these really suspicious posts that made no sense without context last week, turns out they were all referencing a real 'p site, they wouldn't have even figured that out if I never brought attention to it. they also failed to catch embedded DD in gifs like twice now.
â„–18409808[Quote]
>>18409733ok but this really is the best of salt
â„–18409821[Quote]
>>18409801wouldnt it just be easier to ban pedo quoting altogether atp
â„–18409847[Quote]
I'd ban OGD because it really just went off a cliff from there
â„–18409919[Quote]
I would but only for actually bad communities 'cords.
Somewhat
Relax
It fell off.
â„–18410071[Quote]
>Would you bring back Rule 3?
yes
>Would you stricten the rules on pedophillic jokes?
no
>Would you relax integrity.js or open source it?
no
>What do you think of the Swinny?
moralfagged dnb that i only go to when the catalog is shitty