File: Oekaki.png 📥︎ (7.26 KB, 480x480) 9933cdcce647325359842db31c65cf24233b94d9630fbce67cb0c92b81e5369c0ImgOps
№18374003[Quote]
Average amerimutt math level
№18374004[Quote]
its pythagoras or something
№18374011[Quote]
File: Oekaki.png 📥︎ (16.83 KB, 480x480) 9f33cdccc41fb2db79842db204e7cb241f3232d9e61c9dc391b1cf6c80cd32130ImgOps
i solved it
№18374049[Quote]
>Imaginary number
I didn't know your dad was a number.
But seriously, -1+(-1)=-2
So the side must be the square root of -2
№18374098[Quote]
/math/ board NOW
№18374126[Quote]
>>18374098this would make people more intelligent or something
№18374183[Quote]
>>18374170Sharty sci > reddit, 4cuck
№18374188[Quote]
>>18374170How did you find this
№18374206[Quote]
>>18374170/sci/ is just /tech/ maybe we should just make a /stem/ board to cover all of it or something
№18374249[Quote]
you cannot geometrically represent imaginary numbers the same as you cant represent negative length, idiot faggot
№18374260[Quote]
>>18374257this fuckass graph explaining how the current goes in the antennas
№18374272[Quote]
>>18374225But solving problems is not that bad
№18374275[Quote]
>>18373997 (OP)right, so we have a triangle, two sides i, slope side 0, and we need to disprove it… so to start, we have i^y0^(-1) = -1i, and to disprove this triangle in a slope-intercept coordinate systems means, with the two sides that it has given by i, that they intersect by one given i. if they don't intersect there it means the hypothesis is valid, to disprove it, you can show it to have a solution, a positive result. let's just put i^y0^(-1)/(-1i).
№18374280[Quote]
>Solving math with language
№18374315[Quote]
>>18374260you mean a smith chart?
№18374326[Quote]
>>18374280yes, and? my solution works perfectly, its the right aproach, its easy because you don't have to think with the solution at language like in the problem i posted. maybe with all the thinking and problem descriptions language has all its parts already integrated so we need something completely opposite to solve.
№18374342[Quote]
>>18374257I have, nigger, its also used in aerodynamics. But you cant put the i in both axis
№18374350[Quote]
>>18374336Margeredditrald
№18374382[Quote]
>>18374336my clitty is leaking right now because im the chud virgin nigger on the left instead of the giga chad on the right
№18374422[Quote]
>>18374336i the guy on right
№18374428[Quote]
>>18374422kys stupid dumb nigger I hope you die.
№18374440[Quote]
>>18374428i hope u poop ur pants haha geg
№18374441[Quote]
>>18374422bleed. (i imagined a voice in my head saying that as i typed it, this sentence included)
№18374444[Quote]
File: holy esl.png 📥︎ (12.94 MB, 2200x3300) 1b2cebe1569124e1e45b4a1e3d23d13e9adab492674d4b4a58fc6d0d7ab192d40ImgOps
>>>18374336 (You)
>i the guy on right
№18374475[Quote]
i²+i²=-1-1=-2≠0
№18374515[Quote]
>>18374098Tsmt, math is aryan
№18374539[Quote]
>>18374507Geg, kikes dont get infinities
№18374548[Quote]
File: Oekaki.png 📥︎ (19.93 KB, 480x480) 93cdd8d0ccb4839eb35966614b5313e66c434c9bd9b49381a44c337cfb856cc70ImgOps
nusois cant even solve this…
№18374624[Quote]
>>18374561More specifically, he didn't understand the concept of infintesimals. Also what are you talking about?
№18374646[Quote]
>>18374624Leibniz notation was mistake, so many retards dont understand it is an operator
№18374672[Quote]
>>18374646fact nuke
dy/dx from a pure math stand point isn't a division it's just an operation on 2 objects, it just happens that the assumption works out in physics
№18374705[Quote]
>>18374646Kinda true, but it does portray the concept of derivatives pretty well, and the misunderstandings do quite often produce valid formulae, like how if dy/dx=a, then dx/dy=1/a for a given point.
№18374730[Quote]
>>18374659It cant be anything. It can only seemingly have a value when doing limits.
№18374736[Quote]
>>18374705even doe you could have dx=0 dy!=0 and have 1/a=1/0 which means you proved nothing