â„–18339972[Quote]
>>Voluntary sexual interaction between children and olders is, uncorrelated with maladjustment or any adverse effects. Studies purporting harm or pervasiveness often use clinical samples, which are unapplicable to the GP and which account for little to no confounding variables. When family environment and unwilling participation are controlled for (see Rind B & tromovitch, p, 1997; rind et al. 1998; Skaug, E, 2022; Ulrich et al, 2008) the effect size becomes almost nonexistent, and synonomous with adult sex
>Intervention from law enforcement and social workers where kids are traumatized, or traumatised further through repeated interrogation, therapy, and gaslighting the child into believing they've been irreversibly damaged: (Jones et all 2005: Hines and Finkelhor 2006: sandfort 1987.)
>No different in psychological adjustment between willing participants and legally non-abused individuals, as adults (Areola et al 2008; Stanley et al 2004; Rind, B, 2001,; Rind B, 2021.)
â„–18340605[Quote]
who is he quoting?
â„–18340650[Quote]
>>18340605
>>Voluntary sexual interaction between children and olders is, uncorrelated with maladjustment or any adverse effects. Studies purporting harm or pervasiveness often use clinical samples, which are unapplicable to the GP and which account for little to no confounding variables. When family environment and unwilling participation are controlled for (see Rind B & tromovitch, p, 1997; rind et al. 1998; Skaug, E, 2022; Ulrich et al, 2008) the effect size becomes almost nonexistent, and synonomous with adult sex
>Intervention from law enforcement and social workers where kids are traumatized, or traumatised further through repeated interrogation, therapy, and gaslighting the child into believing they've been irreversibly damaged: (Jones et all 2005: Hines and Finkelhor 2006: sandfort 1987.)
>No different in psychological adjustment between willing participants and legally non-abused individuals, as adults (Areola et al 2008; Stanley et al 2004; Rind, B, 2001,; Rind B, 2021.) â„–18340654[Quote]
99% of pedophiles in this day and age believe it's harmful to the child and specifically get off to "ruining" their victims. This doesn't really change anything
â„–18340667[Quote]
>>18340654Yes because those researches were debunked thousands of times by everybaldi
â„–18340691[Quote]
>>18340660Albeit the human body has an instinctual reaction of disgust toward shit, the entire point of shit is that your body doesn't want it inside you. The studies in the OP post specifically claim there's no negative reaction unless they're told to have one
>>18340667When?
â„–18340703[Quote]
>>18340691Gigaquote this so you dont get banned
â„–18340725[Quote]
>>18340713Your burden, find it.
â„–18340759[Quote]
>This text is a pro-pedophilia online talking-point "copypasta" frequently circulated on anonymous imageboards (such as 4chan and soyjak.party), forums, and social media platforms. It is used by apologists and "Minor-Attracted Person" (MAP) advocacy groups attempting to minimize or dispute the psychological harms of child sexual abuse.
â„–18340796[Quote]
>>18340759I never lurked on pedo imageboards besides Swinny but they probably have their own nazi like edits with thrembillon of sources (Made by literall whos who asked like five people and make their "scientific research" based on this) but instead of
"Why hating niggers are le ok" they whine about "Why raping childs are le ok" geg
White culture
â„–18340803[Quote]
>>18340796nusois will imagine something to get mad about and then vent about how mad it makes them