>>18337972 (OP)"state mandated gf" is profoundly retarded as a concept
What if one of the parties (either the woman or the man) says no, for any number of reasons? What if the government decided you needed a state-mandated gay boyfriend, either because of ESG niggers or a clerical error? What if your state-mandated GF is completely incompatible with you (like a drug addict cluster-B whore who will make your life worse just by being around her)? What if someone no longer wanted their state-mandated GF/BF?
Now imagine millions of instances of that happening, because the government decided to play the role of matchmaker, but in an inefficient bureaucratic manner.
It's akin to BNWO. It can only exist in the sex fantasies of incel braniggers.