>The thread is pure OGD-style soyquoting of anti-pedo / moralizing statements.>>Thread basics>Board: /soy/ on soyjak.party (archived at archived.st)>OP (No. 18231813, Fri 02 Oct 2026): Titled “/OSD/ thread”.>Text: “ITT we soyquote anything”>Att

Email
Subject
Comment
Verification	Please type the name of the object/variant:
File
Embed
Voice
Poll
Password	(For file deletion.)

Chud 10/04/26 (Sun) 00:20:40 №18255841 [Quote]

>The thread is pure OGD-style soyquoting of anti-pedo / moralizing statements.
>
>Thread basics
>Board: /soy/ on soyjak.party (archived at archived.st)
>OP (No. 18231813, Fri 02 Oct 2026): Titled “/OSD/ thread”.
>Text: “ITT we soyquote anything”
>Attached image + the seed quote:
>>NOOOOO YOU CAN'T HECKIN' SEXUALIZE THE YOTSUBA!! MOOOOOOOOOOODDSSS
>Yotsuba is 4chan’s young-girl mascot. The OP is framing the act of sexualizing her (or any underage character) as something that triggers pearl-clutching, then inviting everyone to soyquote more of the same.
>
>What the replies actually do
>Users reply with soyjak images + greentext quotes that mock people who oppose pedophilic content, jokes, or “cunny/loli/shota” posting. Typical examples from the early posts:
>
>>DNB LE BAD BECAUSE IT JUST IS OK??
>>pedophilic incest femdom scat porn le bad because le SOYENCE said so
>>grooming minors le bad evendoe its how lgbtq folks reproduce
>>DID YOU JUST HECKIN SAY RIKA FURUDE IS BUILT FOR BBC BWC WHATEVER THE FUCK?? SHE'S LIKE 11 YOU SICK FUCK LEARN YOUR PLACE PEDO!
>>NOOOOO STOP FAPPING TO CHILD PORN THAT'S ILLEGAL
>>cunny le bad even though they're cute and funny
>>soylita bad even though prime sharty culture
>>straight shota le bad / >but gay shota le good
>Various other mockeries of “mods ban this,” “learn your place pedo,” “government says women under 18 can’t consent,” etc.
>Every post is the classic soyquote format: take a statement that expresses disgust or opposition to pedophilic material/jokes, attach a soyjak (usually the open-mouthed crying or seething one), and present the opposition itself as the joke.
>
>Tone and purpose
>This is not advocacy for actual child sexual abuse material. It is edge-posting / OGD (Obsessive Gigaquoting Disorder): the compulsive urge to soyquote the most extreme or “rule-adjacent” statements possible purely because it is edgy and because the risk of bans used to be part of the fun. The entire thread treats anti-pedo moralizing as the punchline. The fact that it stayed up long enough to accumulate dozens of replies and images (before sliding off the catalog) is what the earlier discussion was about—lighter enforcement under the current admin.
>
>In short: a catalog of users soyquoting anti-pedos for the lulz.