[ home / overboard ] [ date ] [ soy / qa / raid / incel ] [ int / pol ] [ a / biz / fit / mtv / r9k / sude / tech / v / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ booru / wiki ]

A banner for soyjak.party

/soy/ - Soyjaks

soyjaks and other associated gems
Catalog
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: Doctos.png 📥︎ (54.97 KB, 300x349) ImgOps

 â„–18234459[Quote]

I have a bad feeling that 'lita is going to be unbanned

 â„–18234479[Quote]

File: 116907 - soybooru.com - gi….png 📥︎ (724.34 KB, 1079x978) ImgOps

>PLEASE UNBAN IT

 â„–18234492[Quote]

File: 1788539471876u.png 📥︎ (1.37 MB, 1416x1444) ImgOps

>'lita le bad even though she's the most attractive soyjak according to der 'ki

 â„–18234505[Quote]

File: 1790714421700g.png 📥︎ (828.82 KB, 1000x1500) ImgOps

>NOOOOOOO PLEASE DON'T UNBAN THE SOYJAK VARIANT THAT LOOKS LIKE A CHILD! IT'S LITERALLY HECKIN 'P! I CAN'T EVEN LOOK AT A CHILD WITHOUT GETTING AROUSED! YOU'RE GOING TO MAKE ME RELAPSE INTO MY INTENSE CHILD PORN ADDICTION IF YOU UNBAN SOYLITA!

 â„–18234517[Quote]

If pedophilic gigas get allowed, that mean 'lita would be allowed but I'm not going to risk posting her

 â„–18234579[Quote]

File: 1786692000559g.png 📥︎ (11.38 KB, 709x1013) ImgOps

>>18234526
the purity spiral began with banning soylita ngl
banning soylita porn like kuz did was the perfect stopping point for rulecucking. then froot went and banned the whole fucking variant and now all the soylita rapeson edits making fun of pedos are too far because
>ermm soylita is inherently pedophilic or something because… because she just is okay?!?!?
and people react to seeing soylita like it's literal fucking 'p. like actual 'p spam gets the same amount of panic as soylita popping up in an smv for 4 seconds

 â„–18234620[Quote]

File: 1785869434559b.png 📥︎ (117.6 KB, 1200x1125) ImgOps

>>18234579
>MUH PURITY SPIRAL
>SHE MAY HAVE BEEN COLOURED AFTER THE PEDO FLAG AND HER NAME MAY BE A PORTMANTEAU OF LOLITA BUT DON'T YOU DARE BE A MORALFASCIST ABOUT IT

 â„–18234627[Quote]

>>18234579
soylita is a good in some uses because it looks like a child more than any other variant and when combined with other trends like troonjak it dehumanizes the tranny much more than a babyjak would

 â„–18234632[Quote]

File: 1786898638237b.gif 📥︎ (4.86 MB, 600x338) ImgOps

MUH PURITY SPIRAL
SHE MAY HAVE BEEN COLOURED AFTER THE PEDO FLAG AND HER NAME MAY BE A PORTMANTEAU OF LOLITA BUT DON'T YOU DARE BE A MORALFASCIST ABOUT IT

 â„–18234634[Quote]

File: Babyjak.png 📥︎ (35.23 KB, 186x250) ImgOps

>>18234627
babyjak is still better
>

 â„–18234641[Quote]

>>18234620
Moralfag

 â„–18234649[Quote]

>>18234627
>depicting trannies as a little girl dehumanises them more than a troonjak does
Yeah, sure tranny.

 â„–18234654[Quote]

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (2.5 MB, 1024x1536) ImgOps

>gooning to cp on the sharty and calling everyone who calls you a pedophile a moralfag

 â„–18234657[Quote]

File: 1789122054703i.gif 📥︎ (3.6 MB, 800x800) ImgOps

>Moralfag

 â„–18234662[Quote]

>>18234649
you don't know what we're talking about retard

 â„–18234670[Quote]

>>18234662
Oh I know exactly what you're talking about faggot.

 â„–18234676[Quote]

File: 1747942103069e.gif 📥︎ (411.22 KB, 680x797) ImgOps

>>>18234627
>>depicting trannies as a little girl dehumanises them more than a troonjak does
>Yeah, sure tranny.

 â„–18234697[Quote]

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (2.5 MB, 1024x1536) ImgOps

>>18234627
>I wanted to tell you that trannies actually like to be treated as children but since I have severe OGD im just going to say this
>being a tranny who likes to be treated as a child because you're severely child porn addicted

 â„–18234702[Quote]

>>18234670
Explain it

 â„–18234706[Quote]

>>18234649
Dumbass I meant depicting trannies as grooming little girls

 â„–18234707[Quote]

>>18234702
The post above you sort of just did.

 â„–18234712[Quote]


 â„–18234715[Quote]

>>18234706
trannies like that bro

 â„–18234719[Quote]

File: 1789200449583p.png 📥︎ (307.79 KB, 1249x1396) ImgOps

>I have a bad feeling that 'lita is going to be unbanned

 â„–18234726[Quote]

>>18234715
not when you portray them as ugly bearded faggots

 â„–18234737[Quote]

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (2.5 MB, 1024x1536) ImgOps

>I have a good feeling that salt will unban cp so we can fill the 'log with our favorite cp gemmies

 â„–18234743[Quote]

>>18234726
and how will you portray that without accidentally drawing 'p?

 â„–18234795[Quote]

>>18234743
I mean that format already existed and it wasn't pornographic.

 â„–18234801[Quote]

>>18234579
if this isn't bait, and you're actually retarded, it literally was named after the book lolita

 â„–18234804[Quote]

>>18234795
and wdym by grooming?

 â„–18234826[Quote]

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (2.5 MB, 1024x1536) ImgOps

>>18234801
>banning soylita but not caring about child porn

 â„–18234850[Quote]

File: 1789231919161c.png 📥︎ (48.19 KB, 744x244) ImgOps

>>18234801
wow how terrible

 â„–18234866[Quote]

File: 1790164360227n.png 📥︎ (27.17 KB, 760x165) ImgOps

>>18234850
oyy doctos how dare it expose pedophilia

 â„–18234907[Quote]

everyone who is pro-soylita in this thread has to be fucking baiting

 â„–18234920[Quote]

File: ClipboardImage.png 📥︎ (2.5 MB, 1024x1536) ImgOps

>>18234907
>being pro-soylita and pro-cp and not baiting about it

 â„–18234933[Quote]

>>18234907
tsmt, soylita is literally worse than 'p. when 'p was spammed a few days ago I felt nothing but when I see soylita my mind is filled with so much rage I can't even control it, I start punching myself in the head to cope with the strong emotions I feel.

 â„–18234944[Quote]

>>18234933
risky…



[Return][Catalog][Go to top][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard ] [ date ] [ soy / qa / raid / incel ] [ int / pol ] [ a / biz / fit / mtv / r9k / sude / tech / v / x ] [ q / news / chive / rules / pass / bans / status ] [ booru / wiki ]