β18190278[Quote]
Nobody cares grandpa
β18190285[Quote]
no arrow
β18190329[Quote]
>>18190239 (OP)banning all the most active users somehow didn't save the site i hate soybabies really bad
β18190330[Quote]
That and penis color wars under soylita posts on the booru
β18190336[Quote]
this was based on actual reddit post btw, where the comment section was all calling the OP a prude for being upset with his wife for buying his 9 year old daughter a dildo (the story was obviously fake but redditors still responded that way geg)
β18190340[Quote]
>>18190330Well and the porn of her too
β18190350[Quote]
thread full of uncsππππ
β18190351[Quote]
>>18190336I saw some other reddit story that I think was real where some lady said she bought her 13 or 14 year old daughter a vibrator and the comments were all other foids praising her
β18190374[Quote]
>>18190239 (OP)>>18190348Why are oldsois like this
β18190388[Quote]
>>18190374if rule 10 wasn't enforced as strictly as it is we would see posts even worse than that on today's sharty
that's a trvke and you know it
β18190396[Quote]
geg
β18190422[Quote]
>>18190388oldsois used to do it in moderation, but because everybody is now obsessed with baiting and getting baited half the site would be this shit
β18190426[Quote]
>>18190374tbh neither one of those are that bad in context
OP post was someone making fun of a reddit post, the second was defending edits of soylita and rapeson (which sounds bad until you realize those were almost always making fun of pedos. the edit of rapeson as a tranny discord groomer standing behind shoyta still gets posted commonly offsite to call trannies pedophiles)
β18190433[Quote]
>>18190390this one is that bad in context doe
β18190454[Quote]
>>18190422Yeah people didn't freak out at posts like that back then, but there'd be a lot more now if it was allowed cause of doctostoddlers
β18190475[Quote]
>>18190426it was around the same time that rapeson itself was created, it's quite unfortunate that both rapeson and soylita were popular at the same time leading Angeleno dilating like he always does over it
β18190492[Quote]
>>18190426Most of the early uses of soylita weren't even made by pedophiles. It only started being a problem when people were spamming images of it that were allegedly traced off real 'p photos or videos and then it got banned shortly after.
β18190511[Quote]
this is nothing, i remember the the bbc making children pregnant and it was like her
>the daughter
>her dad
>her bull
something like that
β18190544[Quote]
>>18190511Yeah and then it started evolving to spadeson getting pregnant from his daughter's bull and stuff kek
β18190545[Quote]
>>18190525inb4 retarded janny bans him
β18190565[Quote]
>>18190525OYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
β18190590[Quote]
>>18190525DOCTOOOOOOOOOOS
β18190600[Quote]
>>18190584If we were in quote era he'd get an insta permaban unless he attached smuglet porn in which case he'd be made a mod
β18191015[Quote]
>>18190454even without doctoddlers the site would probably get spammed with pedo jokes day in and day out for weeks if rule 10 was removed. I think it would stabilize eventually but it'd be really annoying.
the chinny allowing pedo jokes basically shows what would happen. because pedo jokes are banned throughout most of the soysphere, their entire identity is just spamming "bbcp" and abbreviating shit as "cp" and shit since posting that feels so forbidden and edgy. they've beat the joke into the ground so much that they aren't even laughing at the existence of 'p or something they're just laughing at the fucking letters.
>>18190492this is true but soylita actually wasn't even banned after the traced 'p images. those originated as far back as the soot era. when kuz became admin he purged any porn of soylita from the 'ru in response but kept the variant itself unbanned while he was admin (porn was still banned on the sharty too, albeit inconsistently, because it's hard to define what is and isn't porn when it comes to something that can be edited into fucking any situation ever. there were edits of soylita as chris chan's 80 year old mother getting raped, imagine being a janny and having to determine whether or not that's pedophilic porn because the base 'jak is a child or not pedophilic and not porn because the 'jak is portrayed as an elderly woman and the situation is too silly and gross for anyone to goon to. it must've been a fucking nightmare.) kuz himself wanted doll to ban soylita entirely towards the end of the doll era, but it didn't end up happening. it was only under froot when soylita as a whole was banned, and the userbase had pretty mixed reactions even up to that point because of just how much shit she was used in, and how much shit she could be used in as the only 'jak that really portrays a child (babyjak and deformedjaks were seen as too silly, and tbf if you're making a 'jak trying to show that trannies are child groomers or something it kind of does dilute the message when the 'jak you're using is a bearded man with a pacifier or a deformed alien-like thing that doesn't even look human).
β18191033[Quote]
>>18190525>up for almost 40 minutes JANNIES BAN THIS PEDOSWINNYNIGGER NOOOOOOOOW
β18191042[Quote]
>>18191015Not reading this shit nigger
β18191107[Quote]
>>18191015I swear I remember soylita being banned in late kuz era or doll era but I could be wrong. Also yeah the suspicious traces came from much earlier but they only really started being posted frequently in late kuz era which is the first time most people started wanting 'lita banned.
β18191133[Quote]
>>18191107It wasn't all bullshit, some people really were commissioning artists to make that
β18191156[Quote]
>>18190511geg wasn't this also done with mutahar
β18191227[Quote]
>there are 'lita images traced from actual 'p
how do people even know this